Literature DB >> 31646937

Specifying Future Behavior When Assessing Risk Perceptions: Implications for Measurement and Theory.

Erika A Waters1, Nicole Ackermann1, Courtney S Wheeler1.   

Abstract

Background. Many theories assert that high perceived risk motivates health behavior change; the empirical literature shows mixed findings. Purpose. To determine whether, for whom, and under what circumstances specifying a future behavior when assessing perceived risk (i.e., "conditioning" risk perception items on behavior) improves data quality and strengthens the perceived risk-intentions/behavior relationship. Methods. Internet panel participants (N = 787, 58.8% no college experience, 44.4% racial/ethnic minority, 43.7% men, 67.3% aged 18-49 years, 59.0% nonadherent to physical activity guidelines) answered 8 colon cancer perceived risk items in a within-subjects design. Participants answered 4 types of risk perception items: absolute and comparative perceived likelihood and absolute and comparative feelings of risk. Participants answered each type of item twice: once conditioned on not engaging in physical activity and once unconditioned. Results. Compared to unconditioned items, conditioned items elicited fewer "don't know" (DK) responses (OR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68-0.93), higher risk perceptions (b = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.49-0.61) and stronger positive correlations with intentions (zSteiger = 5.46, P < 0.001) and behavior (zSteiger = 5.10, P < 0.001). The effect of conditioning was more pronounced for perceived likelihood than feelings of risk items (OR = 2.21; 95% CI, 1.63-3.01 and b = 0.14; 95% CI, 0.08-0.20 for DK responding and risk perception magnitude, respectively). The effect on risk perception magnitude (except absolute feelings of risk) was higher among people with higher health literacy (χ2(3) = 8.11, P = 0.04). Conclusions. Researchers who examine whether perceived risk motivates precautionary behavior should consider conditioning risk perception items on behavior to increase the validity of the statistical conclusions they draw and to gain insight into the nature of perceived risk and its relation to behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health behavior theory; measurement; risk perception; survey methods

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31646937      PMCID: PMC6895428          DOI: 10.1177/0272989X19879704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  40 in total

1.  Risk as feelings.

Authors:  G F Loewenstein; E U Weber; C K Hsee; N Welch
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: the example of vaccination.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Gretchen B Chapman; Frederick X Gibbons; Meg Gerrard; Kevin D McCaul; Neil D Weinstein
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Low Health Literacy and Health Information Avoidance but Not Satisficing Help Explain "Don't Know" Responses to Questions Assessing Perceived Risk.

Authors:  Heather Orom; Elizabeth Schofield; Marc T Kiviniemi; Erika A Waters; Caitlin Biddle; Xuewei Chen; Yuelin Li; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Jennifer L Hay
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy.

Authors:  A Bechara; H Damasio; D Tranel; A R Damasio
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Thinking versus feeling: differentiating between cognitive and affective components of perceived cancer risk.

Authors:  Eva Janssen; Liesbeth van Osch; Lilian Lechner; Math Candel; Hein de Vries
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2011-07-18

Review 6.  The precaution adoption process.

Authors:  N D Weinstein
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1.

Authors:  Ronald W Rogers
Journal:  J Psychol       Date:  1975-09

8.  Risk perception measures' associations with behavior intentions, affect, and cognition following colon cancer screening messages.

Authors:  Amanda J Dillard; Rebecca A Ferrer; Peter A Ubel; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 4.267

9.  Perceived cancer risk: why is it lower among nonwhites than whites?

Authors:  Heather Orom; Marc T Kiviniemi; Willie Underwood; Levi Ross; Vickie L Shavers
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  Does colorectal cancer risk perception predict screening behavior? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas M Atkinson; Talya Salz; Kaitlin K Touza; Yuelin Li; Jennifer L Hay
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-08-18
View more
  1 in total

1.  Dismissing "Don't Know" Responses to Perceived Risk Survey Items Threatens the Validity of Theoretical and Empirical Behavior-Change Research.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Marc T Kiviniemi; Jennifer L Hay; Heather Orom
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-11-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.