Literature DB >> 17507441

Cancer risk elicitation and communication: lessons from the psychology of risk perception.

William M P Klein1, Michael E Stefanek.   

Abstract

Cancer risk perceptions are a key predictor of risk-reduction practices, health behaviors, and processing of cancer information. Nevertheless, patients and the general public (as well as health care providers) exhibit a number of errors and biases in the way they think about risk, such that their risk perceptions and decisions deviate greatly from those prescribed by normative decision models and by experts in risk assessment. For example, people are more likely to engage in screening behaviors such as mammography when faced with loss-based messages than gain-framed messages, and they often ignore the base rate of a given disease when assessing their own risk of obtaining this disease. In this article, we review many of the psychological processes that underlie risk perception and discuss how these processes lead to such deviations. Among these processes are difficulties with use of numerical information (innumeracy), cognitive processes (eg, use of time-saving heuristics), motivational factors (eg, loss and regret aversion), and emotion. We conclude with suggestions for future research in the area, as well as implications for improving the elicitation and communication of personal cancer risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17507441     DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.57.3.147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin        ISSN: 0007-9235            Impact factor:   508.702


  57 in total

1.  Beneficent persuasion: techniques and ethical guidelines to improve patients' decisions.

Authors:  J S Swindell; Amy L McGuire; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Media messages about cancer: what do people understand?

Authors:  Kathleen M Mazor; Josephine Calvi; Rebecca Cowan; Mary E Costanza; Paul K J Han; Sarah M Greene; Laura Saccoccio; Erica Cove; Douglas Roblin; Andrew Williams
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2010

3.  A study of trends in beliefs and attitudes toward cancer.

Authors:  Eva Schernhammer; Gerald Haidinger; Thomas Waldhör; Roberto Vargas; Christian Vutuc
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Perceived risk for cancer in an urban sexual minority.

Authors:  Jack E Burkhalter; Jennifer L Hay; Elliot Coups; Barbara Warren; Yuelin Li; Jamie S Ostroff
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2010-09-25

5.  Race/ethnicity and the perception of the risk of developing prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vickie L Shavers; Willie Underwood; Richard P Moser
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Emotion, Affect, and Risk Communication with Older Adults: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Melissa L Finucane
Journal:  J Risk Res       Date:  2008

7.  The impact of web-based diabetes risk calculators on information processing and risk perceptions.

Authors:  Christopher Harle; Rema Padman; Julie Downs
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06

8.  Social comparison framing in health news and its effect on perceptions of group risk.

Authors:  Cabral A Bigman
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2013-07-05

9.  Barriers to physician adherence to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug guidelines: a qualitative study.

Authors:  J M Cavazos; A D Naik; A Woofter; N S Abraham
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 8.171

10.  Engagement with genetic discrimination: concerns and experiences in the context of Huntington disease.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Elizabeth Penziner; Oksana Suchowersky; Mark Guttman; Jane S Paulsen; Joan L Bottorff; Michael R Hayden
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.