Literature DB >> 9334763

Speech perception by prelingually deaf children using cochlear implants.

R S Tyler1, H Fryauf-Bertschy, D M Kelsay, B J Gantz, G P Woodworth, A Parkinson.   

Abstract

In this investigation we measured the performance of 50 prelingually deaf children on several speech perception tests. Children were from 2 to 15 years of age, and some children were tested with as much as 5 years of cochlear implant use. Speech perception tests included the recognition of stress pattern, consonants, vowels, words, and sentences. The audiovisual perception of consonants was also measured. Average results indicated that gains were being made in the perception of stress and words in a closed-set context within 1 year from implantation. The perception of words in an open-set context demonstrated much slower increases over time. Large individual differences were observed. Some preliminary data suggest that children who receive implants before the age of 4 years obtain higher scores, on average, than children who receive implants after the age of 5 years. Some children become part-time users or nonusers of their cochlear implants. The average results from 18 congenitally deaf children were significantly higher than the average results from 12 children with prelingually acquired deafness after 3 years of implant use. Information on vowel and consonant features shows increases in performance after 2 years of cochlear implant use, with the exception of the place feature. For this feature, no changes were observed. Vision-alone testing indicated that lipreading performance increased over time. An audiovisual enhancement provided by the cochlear implant was observed for all features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9334763     DOI: 10.1016/s0194-5998(97)70172-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  25 in total

1.  Use of audiovisual information in speech perception by prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants: a first report.

Authors:  L Lachs; D B Pisoni; K I Kirk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  M A Svirsky; A M Robbins; K I Kirk; D B Pisoni; R T Miyamoto
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-03

3.  Talker and lexical effects on audiovisual word recognition by adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Adam R Kaiser; Karen Iler Kirk; Lorin Lachs; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Development of audiovisual comprehension skills in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Tonya R Bergeson; David B Pisoni; Rebecca A O Davis
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Behavioral inhibition and clinical outcomes in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  D L Horn; R A O Davis; D B Pisoni; R T Miyamoto
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Visual-motor integration skills of prelingually deaf children: implications for pediatric cochlear implantation.

Authors:  David L Horn; Mary K Fagan; Caitlin M Dillon; David B Pisoni; Richard T Miyamoto
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Music Therapy for Preschool Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll; Maura Kenworthy; Tanya Van Voorst
Journal:  Music Ther Perspect       Date:  2011-06

8.  Some measures of verbal and spatial working memory in eight- and nine-year-old hearing-impaired children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  M Cleary; D B Pisoni; A E Geers
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Development of visual attention skills in prelingually deaf children who use cochlear implants.

Authors:  D L Horn; R A O Davis; D B Pisoni; R T Miyamoto
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  An exploratory look at pediatric cochlear implantation: is earliest always best?

Authors:  Rachael Frush Holt; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.