Literature DB >> 32444386

Noise-Sensitive But More Precise Subcortical Representations Coexist with Robust Cortical Encoding of Natural Vocalizations.

Samira Souffi1,2, Christian Lorenzi3, Léo Varnet3, Chloé Huetz1,2, Jean-Marc Edeline4,2.   

Abstract

Humans and animals maintain accurate sound discrimination in the presence of loud sources of background noise. It is commonly assumed that this ability relies on the robustness of auditory cortex responses. However, only a few attempts have been made to characterize neural discrimination of communication sounds masked by noise at each stage of the auditory system and to quantify the noise effects on the neuronal discrimination in terms of alterations in amplitude modulations. Here, we measured neural discrimination between communication sounds masked by a vocalization-shaped stationary noise from multiunit responses recorded in the cochlear nucleus, inferior colliculus, auditory thalamus, and primary and secondary auditory cortex at several signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) in anesthetized male or female guinea pigs. Masking noise decreased sound discrimination of neuronal populations in each auditory structure, but collicular and thalamic populations showed better performance than cortical populations at each SNR. In contrast, in each auditory structure, discrimination by neuronal populations was slightly decreased when tone-vocoded vocalizations were tested. These results shed new light on the specific contributions of subcortical structures to robust sound encoding, and suggest that the distortion of slow amplitude modulation cues conveyed by communication sounds is one of the factors constraining the neuronal discrimination in subcortical and cortical levels.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Dissecting how auditory neurons discriminate communication sounds in noise is a major goal in auditory neuroscience. Robust sound coding in noise is often viewed as a specific property of cortical networks, although this remains to be demonstrated. Here, we tested the discrimination performance of neuronal populations at five levels of the auditory system in response to conspecific vocalizations masked by noise. In each acoustic condition, subcortical neurons better discriminated target vocalizations than cortical ones and in each structure, the reduction in discrimination performance was related to the reduction in slow amplitude modulation cues.
Copyright © 2020 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amplitude modulation; auditory system; masking noise; natural sounds; neural discrimination; population recordings

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32444386      PMCID: PMC7329308          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2731-19.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  82 in total

1.  Diversity of receptive field changes in auditory cortex during natural sleep.

Authors:  J M Edeline; G Dutrieux; Y Manunta; E Hennevin
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Distinct time scales in cortical discrimination of natural sounds in songbirds.

Authors:  Rajiv Narayan; Gilberto Graña; Kamal Sen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Robust Neuronal Discrimination in Primary Auditory Cortex Despite Degradations of Spectro-temporal Acoustic Details: Comparison Between Guinea Pigs with Normal Hearing and Mild Age-Related Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Yonane Aushana; Samira Souffi; Jean-Marc Edeline; Christian Lorenzi; Chloé Huetz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-04

4.  Optimal combination of neural temporal envelope and fine structure cues to explain speech identification in background noise.

Authors:  Il Joon Moon; Jong Ho Won; Min-Hyun Park; D Timothy Ives; Kaibao Nie; Michael G Heinz; Christian Lorenzi; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The role of short-time intensity and envelope power for speech intelligibility and psychoacoustic masking.

Authors:  Thomas Biberger; Stephan D Ewert
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Representation of spectral and temporal envelope of twitter vocalizations in common marmoset primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Srikantan S Nagarajan; Steven W Cheung; Purvis Bedenbaugh; Ralph E Beitel; Christoph E Schreiner; Michael M Merzenich
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Laminar differences in the response properties of cells in the primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  M N Wallace; A R Palmer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Processing of communication calls in Guinea pig auditory cortex.

Authors:  Jasmine M S Grimsley; Sharad J Shanbhag; Alan R Palmer; Mark N Wallace
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sparse representation of sounds in the unanesthetized auditory cortex.

Authors:  Tomás Hromádka; Michael R Deweese; Anthony M Zador
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Neural correlates of moderate hearing loss: time course of response changes in the primary auditory cortex of awake guinea-pigs.

Authors:  Chloé Huetz; Maud Guedin; Jean-Marc Edeline
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-28
View more
  6 in total

1.  Natural Statistics as Inference Principles of Auditory Tuning in Biological and Artificial Midbrain Networks.

Authors:  Sangwook Park; Angeles Salles; Kathryne Allen; Cynthia F Moss; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-06-16

2.  Listening in complex acoustic scenes.

Authors:  Andrew J King; Kerry Mm Walker
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2020-09-08

3.  Robustness to Noise in the Auditory System: A Distributed and Predictable Property.

Authors:  S Souffi; C Lorenzi; C Huetz; J-M Edeline
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-03-18

4.  Exposure to 1800 MHz LTE electromagnetic fields under proinflammatory conditions decreases the response strength and increases the acoustic threshold of auditory cortical neurons.

Authors:  Samira Souffi; Julie Lameth; Quentin Gaucher; Délia Arnaud-Cormos; Philippe Lévêque; Jean-Marc Edeline; Michel Mallat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Increased Threshold and Reduced Firing Rate of Auditory Cortex Neurons after Cochlear Implant Insertion.

Authors:  Elie Partouche; Victor Adenis; Dan Gnansia; Pierre Stahl; Jean-Marc Edeline
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-01-31

6.  Distinct timescales for the neuronal encoding of vocal signals in a high-order auditory area.

Authors:  Aurore Cazala; Catherine Del Negro; Nicolas Giret
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.