Literature DB >> 28338496

Infants' and Adults' Use of Temporal Cues in Consonant Discrimination.

Laurianne Cabrera1, Lynne Werner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Adults can use slow temporal envelope cues, or amplitude modulation (AM), to identify speech sounds in quiet. Faster AM cues and the temporal fine structure, or frequency modulation (FM), play a more important role in noise. This study assessed whether fast and slow temporal modulation cues play a similar role in infants' speech perception by comparing the ability of normal-hearing 3-month-olds and adults to use slow temporal envelope cues in discriminating consonants contrasts.
DESIGN: English consonant-vowel syllables differing in voicing or place of articulation were processed by 2 tone-excited vocoders to replace the original FM cues with pure tones in 32 frequency bands. AM cues were extracted in each frequency band with 2 different cutoff frequencies, 256 or 8 Hz. Discrimination was assessed for infants and adults using an observer-based testing method, in quiet or in a speech-shaped noise.
RESULTS: For infants, the effect of eliminating fast AM cues was the same in quiet and in noise: a high proportion of infants discriminated when both fast and slow AM cues were available, but less than half of the infants also discriminated when only slow AM cues were preserved. For adults, the effect of eliminating fast AM cues was greater in noise than in quiet: All adults discriminated in quiet whether or not fast AM cues were available, but in noise eliminating fast AM cues reduced the percentage of adults reaching criterion from 71 to 21%.
CONCLUSIONS: In quiet, infants seem to depend on fast AM cues more than adults do. In noise, adults seem to depend on FM cues to a greater extent than infants do. However, infants and adults are similarly affected by a loss of fast AM cues in noise. Experience with the native language seems to change the relative importance of different acoustic cues for speech perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28338496      PMCID: PMC5482774          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  46 in total

1.  The effects of the addition of low-level, low-noise noise on the intelligibility of sentences processed to remove temporal envelope information.

Authors:  Kathryn Hopkins; Brian C J Moore; Michael A Stone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Temporal and spectral cues in Mandarin tone recognition.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Benefit of high-rate envelope cues in vocoder processing: effect of number of channels and spectral region.

Authors:  Michael A Stone; Christian Füllgrabe; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of lowpass and highpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine structure or envelope cues.

Authors:  Marine Ardoint; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Development of adult-like performance in backward, simultaneous, and forward masking.

Authors:  E Buss; J W Hall; J H Grose; M B Dev
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Perception/production relationships in the development of the vowel duration cue to final consonant voicing.

Authors:  M E Lehman; D J Sharf
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1989-12

7.  A precursor of language acquisition in young infants.

Authors:  J Mehler; P Jusczyk; G Lambertz; N Halsted; J Bertoncini; C Amiel-Tison
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1988-07

8.  A pulse ribbon model of monaural phase perception.

Authors:  R D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception.

Authors:  R Drullman; J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Children discover the spectral skeletons in their native language before the amplitude envelopes.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein; Robert R Packer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  7 in total

1.  Infants use onset asynchrony cues in auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Monika-Maria Oster; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The role of efferents in human auditory development: efferent inhibition predicts frequency discrimination in noise for children.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The development of auditory temporal processing during the first year of life.

Authors:  Laurianne Cabrera; Bonnie K Lau
Journal:  Hearing Balance Commun       Date:  2022-02-02

4.  Selecting auditory alerting stimuli for eagles on the basis of auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Benjamin Goller; Patrice Baumhardt; Ernesto Dominguez-Villegas; Todd Katzner; Esteban Fernández-Juricic; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Speech perception at birth: The brain encodes fast and slow temporal information.

Authors:  Laurianne Cabrera; Judit Gervain
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  Infants' use of isolated and combined temporal cues in speech sound segregation.

Authors:  Monika-Maria Oster; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Amplitude Modulation Detection in Children with a History of Temporary Conductive Hearing Loss Remains Impaired for Years After Restoration of Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Margo McKenna Benoit; Mark Orlando; Kenneth Henry; Paul Allen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.