Literature DB >> 21674213

Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of the complete porcine spine in comparison with data of the human spine.

Hans-Joachim Wilke1, Jürgen Geppert, Annette Kienle.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to provide quantitative biomechanical properties of the whole porcine spine and compare them with data from the literature on the human spine. Complete spines were sectioned into single joint segments and tested in a spine tester with pure moments in the three main anatomical planes. Range of motion, neutral zone and stiffness parameters of the spine were determined in flexion/extension, right/left lateral bending and left/right axial rotation. Comparison with data of the human spine reported in the literature showed that certain regions of the porcine spine exhibit greater similarities than others. The cervical area of C1-C2 and the upper and middle thoracic sections exhibited the most similarities. The lower thoracic and the lumbar area are qualitatively similar to the human spine. The remaining cervical section from C3 to C7 appears to be less suitable as a model. Based on the biomechanical similarities of certain regions of the porcine and human spines demonstrated by this study results, it appears that the use of the porcine spine could be an alternative to human specimens in the field of in vitro research. However, it has to be emphasized that the porcine spine is not a suitable biomechanics surrogate for all regions of the human spinal column, and it should be carefully considered whether other specimens, for example from the calf or sheep spine, represent a better alternative for a specific scientific question. It should be noted that compared with human specimens each animal model always only represents a compromise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21674213      PMCID: PMC3207338          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1822-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  45 in total

1.  Rate-related fatigue injury of vertebral disc under axial cyclic loading in a porcine body-disc-body unit.

Authors:  K-H Tsai; R-M Lin; G-L Chang
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Intersegmental spinal flexibility with lumbosacral instrumentation. An in vitro biomechanical investigation.

Authors:  T Asazuma; I A Stokes; M S Moreland; N Suzuki
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Limitations of the cervical porcine spine in evaluating spinal implants in comparison with human cervical spinal segments: a biomechanical in vitro comparison of porcine and human cervical spine specimens with different instrumentation techniques.

Authors:  René Schmidt; Marcus Richter; Lutz Claes; Wolfhart Puhl; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Anatomical measurements of porcine lumbar vertebrae.

Authors:  R Dath; A D Ebinesan; K M Porter; A W Miles
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  The immediate effect of repeated loading on the compressive strength of young porcine lumbar spine.

Authors:  Olof Thoreson; Adad Baranto; Lars Ekström; Sten Holm; Mikael Hellström; Leif Swärd
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants.

Authors:  H J Wilke; K Wenger; L Claes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  A universal spine tester for in vitro experiments with muscle force simulation.

Authors:  H J Wilke; L Claes; H Schmitt; S Wolf
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Functional anatomy of the deer spine: an appropriate biomechanical model for the human spine?

Authors:  Naresh Kumar; Sandeep Kukreti; Mushtaque Ishaque; Dilip K Sengupta; Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  2002-02-01

9.  Three-dimensional biomechanical properties of the human cervical spine in vitro. I. Analysis of normal motion.

Authors:  N Wen; F Lavaste; J J Santin; J P Lassau
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome - an experimental study in porcine model.

Authors:  Ching-Lung Tai; Pang-Hsing Hsieh; Weng-Pin Chen; Lih-Huei Chen; Wen-Jer Chen; Po-Liang Lai
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  21 in total

1.  Asymmetrical intrapleural pressure distribution: a cause for scoliosis? A computational analysis.

Authors:  Benedikt Schlager; Frank Niemeyer; Fabio Galbusera; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Pressure-induced end-plate fracture in the porcine spine: Is the annulus fibrosus susceptible to damage?

Authors:  Chelsea R Snow; Maxine Harvey-Burgess; Brigitte Laird; Stephen H M Brown; Diane E Gregory
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Maternal Diets Deficient in Vitamin D Increase the Risk of Kyphosis in Offspring: A Novel Kyphotic Porcine Model.

Authors:  Matthew A Halanski; Blake Hildahl; Laura A Amundson; Ellen Leiferman; Annette Gendron-Fitzpatrick; Rajeev Chaudhary; Heather M Hartwig-Stokes; Ronald McCabe; Rachel Lenhart; Matthew Chin; Jennifer Birstler; Thomas D Crenshaw
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  In vivo through-range passive stiffness of the lumbar spine: a meta-analysis of measurements and methods.

Authors:  Andrew A Watt; Andrew J Callaway; Jonathan M Williams
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.079

5.  A new dynamic six degrees of freedom disc-loading simulator allows to provoke disc damage and herniation.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; Annette Kienle; Sebastian Maile; Volker Rasche; Nikolaus Berger-Roscher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Comparative finite-element analysis: a single computational modelling method can estimate the mechanical properties of porcine and human vertebrae.

Authors:  K Robson Brown; S Tarsuslugil; V N Wijayathunga; R K Wilcox
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Novel pedicle screw and plate system provides superior stability in unilateral fixation for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: an in vitro biomechanical study.

Authors:  Jie Li; Hong Xiao; Qingan Zhu; Yue Zhou; Changqing Li; Huan Liu; Zhiping Huang; Jin Shang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Tissue loading created during spinal manipulation in comparison to loading created by passive spinal movements.

Authors:  Martha Funabashi; Gregory N Kawchuk; Albert H Vette; Peter Goldsmith; Narasimha Prasad
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Artificial disc and vertebra system: a novel motion preservation device for cervical spinal disease after vertebral corpectomy.

Authors:  Jun Dong; Meng Lu; Teng Lu; Baobao Liang; Junkui Xu; Jie Qin; Xuan Cai; Sihua Huang; Dong Wang; Haopeng Li; Xijing He
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  Biomechanical evaluation of monosegmental pedicle instrumentation in a calf spine model and the role of fractured vertebrae in screw stability.

Authors:  Fuxin Wei; Zhiyu Zhou; Le Wang; Shaoyu Liu; Rui Zhong; Xizhe Liu; Shangbin Cui; Ximin Pan; Manman Gao; Yajing Zhao
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.