Literature DB >> 2267610

Intersegmental spinal flexibility with lumbosacral instrumentation. An in vitro biomechanical investigation.

T Asazuma1, I A Stokes, M S Moreland, N Suzuki.   

Abstract

Flexibility of the porcine lumbosacral spine was measured after application of six different types of surgical instrumentation, and in a control state. Fifteen adult pig spines were tested with flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation torques applied to the upper end with the pelvis fixed. Instrumentation was applied across two lumbar segments and the lumbosacral level (L5-6, L6-7, and L7-S1). Stereophotogrammetry was used to track markers applied to each vertebra. Intersegmental motion was measured as three angles and as the relative linear translation of adjacent transverse processes and spinous processes. Results showed that all instrumentation systems reduced intersegmental motion compared with the control state, except for minimal reduction at L5-6 by Harrington instrumentation in all loading directions, especially axial rotation. The pedicle screw systems were always the most rigid. After applying instrumentation, there were differences in the motion occurring at different anatomic levels, most commonly with the least motion occurring in the middle of the instrumented segment (L6-7). When intervertebral motion was expressed as the linear motion between adjacent spinous and transverse processes, the usual site of posterolateral fusion, it was 0.6 to 1.8 mm per degree of angular motion at the transverse processes and 1.3 to 2.1 mm per degree at spinous processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2267610     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199011010-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  Biomechanical behaviour in vitro of the spine and lumbosacral junction.

Authors:  X Barthes; B Walter; R Zeller; J F Dubousset
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Load-displacement properties of the thoracolumbar calf spine: experimental results and comparison to known human data.

Authors:  H J Wilke; S T Krischak; K H Wenger; L E Claes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of the complete porcine spine in comparison with data of the human spine.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; Jürgen Geppert; Annette Kienle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Compliance of the L5-S1 spinal unit: a comparative study between an unconstrained and a partially constrained system.

Authors:  E A Charriere; T Beutler; M Caride; P Mordasini; T E Orr; P K Zysset
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Biomechanical evaluation of different instrumentation for spinal stabilisation.

Authors:  A G Graftiaux; B Wattier; P Gentil; C Mazel; W Skalli; A Diop; P H Kehr; F Lavaste
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  1995-12

6.  Mature runt cow lumbar intradiscal pressures and motion segment biomechanics.

Authors:  Glenn Robin Buttermann; Brian P Beaubien; Louis C Saeger
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Vertebral Compression Fractures after Lumbar Instrumentation.

Authors:  Michelle Granville; Aldo Berti; Robert E Jacobson
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-09-29

8.  Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome - an experimental study in porcine model.

Authors:  Ching-Lung Tai; Pang-Hsing Hsieh; Weng-Pin Chen; Lih-Huei Chen; Wen-Jer Chen; Po-Liang Lai
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.