Literature DB >> 11788944

Functional anatomy of the deer spine: an appropriate biomechanical model for the human spine?

Naresh Kumar1, Sandeep Kukreti, Mushtaque Ishaque, Dilip K Sengupta, Robert C Mulholland.   

Abstract

The object of this study was to create a database for the biomechanical and certain functional anatomical parameters of the deer spine, for comparison with the human spine. This was done with a view toward using the deer spine as an alternative model for various biomechanical experiments, as it is difficult to procure nonembalmed, fresh human spine specimens. Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) and its human variant, Creutzfeld Jakob disease (CJD), prevent us from using bovine and sheep spine. There is a risk of transmission of disease through direct inoculation to the researcher working with infected bovine or sheep spine, and a theoretical possibility of transmission through the food chain if proper precautions for specimen disposal are not taken. We chose deer spine as an alternative for testing nonembalmed fresh human spine because, to date, there have been no reported cases of deer being carriers of prion diseases. Fifteen deer spine specimens were sectioned appropriately to obtain six functional spinal units for each level in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Each unit was tested in a Dartec materials testing machine (Dartec Ltd., Stourbridge, UK) under pure moments in three main anatomical planes. The range of motion (ROM), neutral zone (NZ), and stiffness parameters of the functional unit were determined in flexion-extension, right/left lateral bending, and axial rotation. The data obtained were compared with the corresponding human spine data in the literature. Deer spine specimens were also studied for bone mineral density (BMD) using a DEXA scan. The results revealed the overall ROM was greater for deer spine compared to the human spine in the upper thoracic region, but less compared to human spine in the lower lumbar spine region. The only comparable region for ROM was in the lower thoracic/upper lumbar region. The stiffness coefficients were also comparable in this region. The BMD was also comparable in the two species. We conclude that the lower thoracic/upper lumbar region in the deer spine can be used as a model for some human biomechanical experiments because of its biomechanical and material similarities to the human spine of the corresponding region. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11788944     DOI: 10.1002/ar.10041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec        ISSN: 0003-276X


  6 in total

1.  Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of the complete porcine spine in comparison with data of the human spine.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; Jürgen Geppert; Annette Kienle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Morphometric comparison of the lumbar cancellous bone of sheep, deer, and humans.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Guomin Liu; Ting Li; Yanlong Xiao; Qing Han; Randong Xu; Youqiong Li
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.982

3.  Determination of torque-limits for human and cat lumbar spine specimens during displacement-controlled physiological motions.

Authors:  Allyson Ianuzzi; Joel G Pickar; Partap S Khalsa
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans.

Authors:  Sun-Ren Sheng; Hua-Zi Xu; Yong-Li Wang; Qing-An Zhu; Fang-Min Mao; Yan Lin; Xiang-Yang Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Trajectory of instantaneous axis of rotation in fixed lumbar spine with instrumentation.

Authors:  Masataka Inoue; Tetsutaro Mizuno; Toshihiko Sakakibara; Takaya Kato; Takamasa Yoshikawa; Tadashi Inaba; Yuichi Kasai
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Biomechanical Stability of a Cross-Rod Connection with a Pedicle Screw System.

Authors:  Tetsutaro Mizuno; Toshihiko Sakakibara; Takamasa Yoshikawa; Tadashi Inaba; Takaya Kato; Yuichi Kasai
Journal:  Med Sci Monit Basic Res       Date:  2018-01-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.