Literature DB >> 21670288

Female extrapair mating behavior can evolve via indirect selection on males.

Wolfgang Forstmeier1, Katrin Martin, Elisabeth Bolund, Holger Schielzeth, Bart Kempenaers.   

Abstract

In many species that form socially monogamous pair bonds, a considerable proportion of the offspring is sired by extrapair males. This observation has remained a puzzle for evolutionary biologists: although mating outside the pair bond can obviously increase the offspring production of males, the benefits of such behavior to females are less clear, yet females are known to actively solicit extrapair copulations. For more than two decades adaptionist explanations have dominated the discussions, yet remain controversial, and genetic constraint arguments have been dismissed without much consideration. An intriguing but still untested hypothesis states that extrapair mating behavior by females may be affected by the same genetic variants (alleles) as extrapair mating behavior by males, such that the female behavior could evolve through indirect selection on the male behavior. Here we show that in the socially monogamous zebra finch, individual differences in extrapair mating behavior have a hereditary component. Intriguingly, this genetic basis is shared between the sexes, as shown by a strong genetic correlation between male and female measurements of extrapair mating behavior. Hence, positive selection on males to sire extrapair young will lead to increased extrapair mating by females as a correlated evolutionary response. This behavior leads to a fundamentally different view of female extrapair mating: it may exist even if females obtain no net benefit from it, simply because the corresponding alleles were positively selected in the male ancestors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21670288      PMCID: PMC3127899          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1103195108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  29 in total

1.  The strength of direct selection against female promiscuity is associated with rates of extrapair fertilizations in socially monogamous songbirds.

Authors:  Tomás Albrecht; Jakub Kreisinger; Jaroslav Piálek
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  The evolution of infidelity in socially monogamous passerines: neglected components of direct and indirect selection.

Authors:  Simon C Griffith
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Sexual imprinting on continuous variation: do female zebra finches prefer or avoid unfamiliar sons of their foster parents?

Authors:  H Schielzeth; C Burger; E Bolund; W Forstmeier
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Extra-pair paternity in birds: explaining variation between species and populations.

Authors:  M Petrie; B Kempenaers
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Associations between dopamine D4 receptor gene variation with both infidelity and sexual promiscuity.

Authors:  Justin R Garcia; James MacKillop; Edward L Aller; Ann M Merriwether; David Sloan Wilson; J Koji Lum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Genetic variation in the vasopressin receptor 1a gene (AVPR1A) associates with pair-bonding behavior in humans.

Authors:  Hasse Walum; Lars Westberg; Susanne Henningsson; Jenae M Neiderhiser; David Reiss; Wilmar Igl; Jody M Ganiban; Erica L Spotts; Nancy L Pedersen; Elias Eriksson; Paul Lichtenstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Male infertility, female fertility and extrapair copulations.

Authors:  Oren Hasson; Lewi Stone
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2009-03-11

8.  No genetic correlation between the sexes in mating frequency in the bean beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis.

Authors:  T Harano; T Miyatake
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 9.  Female sexual function and dysfunction in the reproductive years: the influence of endogenous and exogenous sex hormones.

Authors:  Bronwyn G A Stuckey
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.802

10.  Do individual females differ intrinsically in their propensity to engage in extra-pair copulations?

Authors:  Wolfgang Forstmeier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  46 in total

Review 1.  Sexual selection is a form of social selection.

Authors:  Bruce E Lyon; Robert Montgomerie
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  When mothers make sons sexy: maternal effects contribute to the increased sexual attractiveness of extra-pair offspring.

Authors:  Barbara Tschirren; Erik Postma; Alison N Rutstein; Simon C Griffith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Promiscuous mating produces offspring with higher lifetime fitness.

Authors:  Nicole M Gerlach; Joel W McGlothlin; Patricia G Parker; Ellen D Ketterson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sex differences in developmental plasticity and canalization shape population divergence in mate preferences.

Authors:  Erik I Svensson; Anna Runemark; Machteld N Verzijden; Maren Wellenreuther
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Mating portfolios: bet-hedging, sexual selection and female multiple mating.

Authors:  Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez; Yukio Yasui; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Polyandry and alternative mating tactics.

Authors:  Bryan D Neff; Erik I Svensson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Behavioural ecology: Love thy neighbour.

Authors:  Ben C Sheldon; Marc Mangel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Sex and boldness explain individual differences in spatial learning in a lizard.

Authors:  Pau Carazo; Daniel W A Noble; Dani Chandrasoma; Martin J Whiting
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Bayesian learning and the psychology of rule induction.

Authors:  Ansgar D Endress
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-03-01

10.  Increased extra-pair paternity in broods of aging males and enhanced recruitment of extra-pair young in a migratory bird.

Authors:  E Keith Bowers; Anna M Forsman; Brian S Masters; Bonnie G P Johnson; L Scott Johnson; Scott K Sakaluk; Charles F Thompson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.