Literature DB >> 25377451

Sex differences in developmental plasticity and canalization shape population divergence in mate preferences.

Erik I Svensson1, Anna Runemark2, Machteld N Verzijden3, Maren Wellenreuther3.   

Abstract

Sexual selection of high-quality mates can conflict with species recognition if traits that govern intraspecific mate preferences also influence interspecific recognition. This conflict might be resolved by developmental plasticity and learned mate preferences, which could drive preference divergence in populations that differ in local species composition. We integrate field and laboratory experiments on two calopterygid damselfly species with population genetic data to investigate how sex differences in developmental plasticity affect population divergence in the face of gene flow. Whereas male species recognition is fixed at emergence, females instead learn to recognize heterospecifics. Females are therefore more plastic in their mate preferences than males. We suggest that this results from sex differences in the balance between sexual selection for high-quality mates and selection for species recognition. As a result of these sex differences, females develop more pronounced population divergence in their mate preferences compared with males. Local ecological community context and presence of heterospecifics in combination with sex differences in plasticity and canalization therefore shape population divergence in mate preferences. As ongoing environmental change and habitat fragmentation bring formerly allopatric species into secondary contact, developmental plasticity of mate preferences in either or both sexes might facilitate coexistence and prevent local species extinction.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  community ecology; evolutionary rescue; gene flow; learning; mate preferences; speciation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25377451      PMCID: PMC4240983          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  35 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  The impact of learning on sexual selection and speciation.

Authors:  Machteld N Verzijden; Carel ten Cate; Maria R Servedio; Genevieve M Kozak; Jenny W Boughman; Erik I Svensson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Female mate-choice behavior and sympatric speciation.

Authors:  Machteld N Verzijden; Robert F Lachlan; Maria R Servedio
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Effects on population divergence of within-generational learning about prospective mates.

Authors:  Maria R Servedio; Reuven Dukas
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Contrasting theory with the empirical data of species recognition.

Authors:  Terry J Ord; Léandra King; Adrian R Young
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 6.  Magic traits in speciation: 'magic' but not rare?

Authors:  Maria R Servedio; G Sander Van Doorn; Michael Kopp; Alicia M Frame; Patrik Nosil
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  A role for learning in population divergence of mate preferences.

Authors:  Erik I Svensson; Fabrice Eroukhmanoff; Kristina Karlsson; Anna Runemark; Anders Brodin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Demography can favour female-advantageous alleles.

Authors:  Anna M F Harts; Lisa E Schwanz; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila.

Authors:  M A Noor
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Simulating range expansion: male species recognition and loss of premating isolation in damselflies.

Authors:  Maren Wellenreuther; Katja Tynkkynen; Erik I Svensson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Linking local adaptation with the evolution of sex differences.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Florence Débarre; Xiang-Yi Li
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Sex differences in local adaptation: what can we learn from reciprocal transplant experiments?

Authors:  Erik I Svensson; Debora Goedert; Miguel A Gómez-Llano; Foteini Spagopoulou; Angela Nava-Bolaños; Isobel Booksmythe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Urban driven phenotypic changes: empirical observations and theoretical implications for eco-evolutionary feedback.

Authors:  Marina Alberti; John Marzluff; Victoria M Hunt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Selection on phenotypic plasticity favors thermal canalization.

Authors:  Erik I Svensson; Miguel Gomez-Llano; John T Waller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Introduced parasite changes host phenotype, mating signal and hybridization risk: Philornis downsi effects on Darwin's finch song.

Authors:  Sonia Kleindorfer; Georgina Custance; Katharina J Peters; Frank J Sulloway
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Female northern grass lizards judge mates by body shape to reinforce local adaptation.

Authors:  Kun Guo; Chen Chen; Xiao-Fang Liang; Yan-Fu Qu; Xiang Ji
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 7.  Nonadaptive radiation in damselflies.

Authors:  Maren Wellenreuther; Rosa Ana Sánchez-Guillén
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 5.183

Review 8.  Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies) as a bridge between ecology and evolutionary genomics.

Authors:  Seth Bybee; Alex Córdoba-Aguilar; M Catherine Duryea; Ryo Futahashi; Bengt Hansson; M Olalla Lorenzo-Carballa; Ruud Schilder; Robby Stoks; Anton Suvorov; Erik I Svensson; Janne Swaegers; Yuma Takahashi; Phillip C Watts; Maren Wellenreuther
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  Can the narrow red bands of dragonflies be used to perceive wing interference patterns?

Authors:  Mikkel Brydegaard; Samuel Jansson; Marcus Schulz; Anna Runemark
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 2.912

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.