Literature DB >> 19344430

Male infertility, female fertility and extrapair copulations.

Oren Hasson1, Lewi Stone.   

Abstract

Females that are socially bonded to a single male, either in a social monogamy or in a social polygyny, are often sexually polyandrous. Extrapair copulations (EPC) have often been suggested or rejected, on both empirical and theoretical grounds, as an important mechanism that enables females to avoid fertility risks in case their socially bonded male is infertile. Here, we explore this possibility in two steps. First, we present a mathematical model that assumes that females have no precopulatory information about male fertility, and shows that a female EPC strategy increases female reproductive success only if certain specific conditions are upheld in the nature of male infertility. In particular, these conditions require both (i) that fertile sperm precedence (FSP) is absent or incomplete within ejaculates of the same male (i.e. that an infertile male is, at least partly, truly infertile), and (ii) the existence of FSP among ejaculates of different males (such that infertile spermatozoa of the infertile male are at a disadvantage when competing against spermatozoa of a fertile male). Second, to evaluate their potential role in the evolution of female EPC, we review the abundance and FSP patterns of the different male infertility types. The conclusion is drawn that some common infertility types, such as poor sperm count or motility, contribute to the evolution of female EPC, whereas other common infertility types, such as sperm depletion or allocation in a social monogamy (but not in a social polygyny), and in particular male driven polyspermy, do not. Also, a deeper look at the arms race between sperm fertilization efficiency and female barriers to sperm may answer the non-trivial question: "why are some types of infertility so common?"

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19344430     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00068.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  13 in total

1.  Female extrapair mating behavior can evolve via indirect selection on males.

Authors:  Wolfgang Forstmeier; Katrin Martin; Elisabeth Bolund; Holger Schielzeth; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Trade-off between carotenoid-based sexual ornamentation and sperm resistance to oxidative challenge.

Authors:  Oldřich Tomášek; Jana Albrechtová; Martina Němcová; Pavlína Opatová; Tomáš Albrecht
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Environmental variability directly affects the prevalence of divorce in monogamous albatrosses.

Authors:  Francesco Ventura; José Pedro Granadeiro; Paul M Lukacs; Amanda Kuepfer; Paulo Catry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Experimental extra-pair copulations provide proof of concept for fertility insurance in a socially monogamous bird.

Authors:  Oscar Vedder
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 5.530

5.  Polygyny and extra-pair paternity enhance the opportunity for sexual selection in blue tits.

Authors:  Oscar Vedder; Jan Komdeur; Marco van der Velde; Elske Schut; Michael J L Magrath
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Do the benefits of polyandry scale with outbreeding?

Authors:  Emily R Burdfield-Steel; Sam Auty; David M Shuker
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.671

7.  The repeatability of mating failure in a polyandrous bug.

Authors:  E V Ginny Greenway; D M Shuker
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 8.  Polyandry as a mediator of sexual selection before and after mating.

Authors:  Charlotta Kvarnemo; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Hit or Miss: Fertilization Outcomes of Natural Inseminations by Japanese Quail.

Authors:  Elizabeth Adkins-Regan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Feed-backs among inbreeding, inbreeding depression in sperm traits, and sperm competition can drive evolution of costly polyandry.

Authors:  Greta Bocedi; Jane M Reid
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.