Literature DB >> 18624884

Sexual imprinting on continuous variation: do female zebra finches prefer or avoid unfamiliar sons of their foster parents?

H Schielzeth1, C Burger, E Bolund, W Forstmeier.   

Abstract

Sexual imprinting on discrete variation that serves the identification of species, morphs or sexes is well documented. By contrast, sexual imprinting on continuous variation leading to individual differences in mating preferences within a single species, morph and sex has been studied only once (in humans). We measured female preferences in a captive population of wild-type zebra finches. Individual cross-fostering ensured that all subjects grew up with unrelated foster parents and nest mates. Females from two cohorts (N = 113) were given a simultaneous choice between (two or four) unfamiliar males, one of which was a genetic son of their foster parents (SFP). We found no significant overall preference for the SFP (combined effect size d = 0.14 +/- 0.15). Additionally, we tested if foster parent traits could potentially explain between-female variation in preferences. However, neither the effectiveness of cooperation between the parents nor male contribution to parental care affected female preferences for the son of the foster father. We conclude that at least in zebra finches sexual imprinting is not a major source of between-individual variation in mating preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18624884     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01568.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  6 in total

1.  Compensatory investment in zebra finches: females lay larger eggs when paired to sexually unattractive males.

Authors:  Elisabeth Bolund; Holger Schielzeth; Wolfgang Forstmeier
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Female extrapair mating behavior can evolve via indirect selection on males.

Authors:  Wolfgang Forstmeier; Katrin Martin; Elisabeth Bolund; Holger Schielzeth; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Variation in human mate choice: simultaneously investigating heritability, parental influence, sexual imprinting, and assortative mating.

Authors:  Brendan P Zietsch; Karin J H Verweij; Andrew C Heath; Nicholas G Martin
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Environmental effects shape the maternal transfer of carotenoids and vitamin E to the yolk.

Authors:  Wendt Müller; Jonas Vergauwen; Marcel Eens; Jonathan D Blount
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.172

5.  Heritability of and early environment effects on variation in mating preferences.

Authors:  Holger Schielzeth; Elisabeth Bolund; Wolfgang Forstmeier
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Fitness Benefits of Mate Choice for Compatibility in a Socially Monogamous Species.

Authors:  Malika Ihle; Bart Kempenaers; Wolfgang Forstmeier
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 8.029

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.