Literature DB >> 21667356

Osteoporosis onset differences between rural and metropolitan populations: correlation to fracture type, severity, and treatment efficacy.

Thomas Pagonis1, Panagiotis Givissis, Athanasios Pagonis, Georgios Petsatodis, Anastasios Christodoulou.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis is the prevalent cause of fractures in an ever-aging population, with an established correlation between daily activities and way of life. We aimed to delineate differences in onset of osteoporosis, T-score progression, quality of life, and correlation to prevalence, types, and severity of fractures in age-comparable populations of rural and metropolitan habitats in this multicenter, retrospective double-blind study. We evaluated data derived from the medical files of two comparable groups of osteoporotic patients: group A (n = 530, rural area) and group B (n = 171, metropolitan area). Both groups received comparable treatment for osteoporosis. Comparison was performed on the basis of osteoporosis onset, T-score in a maximum of 8 years follow-up, fracture types [American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AO) categorization], and type of treatment followed. Quality of life was assessed by use of specialized questionnaires. From the minimum 4-year follow-up of all patients included in the research, there was a statistically significant difference in favor of the rural population in all research parameters. Rural populations presented with osteoporosis at a later age than their metropolitan counterparts, exhibiting favorable T-scores with comparable treatments and simpler fractures (AO categorization). Metropolitan habitats and life therein have a deleterious effect on osteoporosis onset and response to treatment. Rural populations are diagnosed with osteoporosis on a later age, with better compliance and improved treatment outcome. Fracture categorization shows increased severity in the metropolitan populace and a suggested correlation between a poor-quality way of life and decreased activity levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21667356     DOI: 10.1007/s00774-011-0286-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab        ISSN: 0914-8779            Impact factor:   2.626


  36 in total

Review 1.  Birth and death of bone cells: basic regulatory mechanisms and implications for the pathogenesis and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  S C Manolagas
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025.

Authors:  Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Age- and gender-specific rate of fractures in Australia: a population-based study.

Authors:  K M Sanders; E Seeman; A M Ugoni; J A Pasco; T J Martin; B Skoric; G C Nicholson; M A Kotowicz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  A meta-analysis of cigarette smoking, bone mineral density and risk of hip fracture: recognition of a major effect.

Authors:  M R Law; A K Hackshaw
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-10-04

5.  The long-term predictive value of bone mineral density measurements for fracture risk is independent of the site of measurement and the age at diagnosis: results from the Prospective Epidemiological Risk Factors study.

Authors:  Yu Z Bagger; László B Tankó; Peter Alexandersen; Henrik B Hansen; Gerong Qin; Claus Christiansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Increased bone turnover in late postmenopausal women is a major determinant of osteoporosis.

Authors:  P Garnero; E Sornay-Rendu; M C Chapuy; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Dietary calcium and hip fracture risk: the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  A C Looker; T B Harris; J H Madans; C T Sempos
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Osteoporosis management: a perspective based on bisphosphonate data from randomised clinical trials and observational databases.

Authors:  S Boonen; R Kay; C Cooper; P Haentjens; D Vanderschueren; F Callewaert; K Milisen; S Ferrari
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 9.  Vertebral Fracture Assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: insurance coverage issues in the United States. A White Paper of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Authors:  Andrew J Laster; E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 2.617

10.  Changes in bone density and turnover after alendronate or estrogen withdrawal.

Authors:  Richard D Wasnich; Yu Z Bagger; David J Hosking; Michael R McClung; Mei Wu; Ann Marie Mantz; John J Yates; Philip D Ross; Peter Alexandersen; Pernille Ravn; Claus Christiansen; Arthur C Santora
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.953

View more
  3 in total

1.  Posterior instrumentation after a failed balloon kyphoplasty in the thoracolumbar junction: a case report.

Authors:  David Cumming; Thomas Pagonis; Ryan Wood
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2014-06-13

2.  Incidence of osteoporosis and ambient air pollution in South Korea: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jinyoung Shin; Hyuk Jung Kweon; Kyoung Ja Kwon; Seol-Heui Han
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 3.  Remote Management of Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Jordan L Saag; Maria I Danila
Journal:  Curr Treatm Opt Rheumatol       Date:  2022-09-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.