Literature DB >> 9353503

A meta-analysis of cigarette smoking, bone mineral density and risk of hip fracture: recognition of a major effect.

M R Law1, A K Hackshaw.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the magnitude and importance of the relation between smoking, bone mineral density, and risk of hip fracture according to age.
DESIGN: Meta-analysis of 29 published cross sectional studies reporting the difference in bone density in 2156 smokers and 9705 non-smokers according to age, and of 19 cohort and case-control studies recording 3889 hip fractures reporting risk in smokers relative to non-smokers.
RESULTS: In premenopausal women bone density was similar in smokers and non-smokers. Postmenopausal bone loss was greater in current smokers than non-smokers, bone density diminishing by about an additional 2% for every 10 year increase in age, with a difference of 6% at age 80. In current smokers relative to non-smokers the risk of hip fracture was similar at age 50 but greater thereafter by an estimated 17% at age 60, 41% at 70, 71% at 80, and 108% at 90. These estimates of relative risk by age, derived directly from a regression analysis of the studies of smoking and hip fracture, were close to estimates using the difference in bone density between smokers and non-smokers and the association between bone density and risk of hip fracture. The estimated cumulative risk of hip fracture in women in England was 19% in smokers and 12% in non-smokers to age 85; 37% and 22% to age 90. Among all women, one hip fracture in eight is attributable to smoking. Limited data in men suggest a similar proportionate effect of smoking as in women. The association was not explained by smokers being thinner, younger at menopause, and exercising less nor by actions of smoking on oestrogen, but smoking may have a direct action on bone.
CONCLUSIONS: Hip fracture in old age is a major adverse effect of smoking after the menopause. The cumulative excess bone loss over decades is substantial, increasing the lifetime risk of hip fracture by about half.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9353503      PMCID: PMC2127590          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.315.7112.841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  152 in total

1.  Risk factors for low bone mineral density among a large group of Norwegian women with fractures.

Authors:  L M Omland; G S Tell; S Ofjord; A Skag
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 2.  Genetics of osteoporosis.

Authors:  S H Ralston
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.514

3.  The smoking patterns of women in their forties: their relationship to later osteoporosis.

Authors:  Judith S Brook; Elinor B Balka; Chenshu Zhang
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2012-04

4.  The impact of smoking, alcohol consumption, and physical activity on use of hospital services.

Authors:  N Haapanen-Niemi; S Miilunpalo; I Vuori; M Pasanen; P Oja
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Risk factors for low bone mineral density and the 6-year rate of bone loss among premenopausal and perimenopausal women.

Authors:  Kathleen E Bainbridge; MaryFran Sowers; Xihong Lin; Sioban D Harlow
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Prevalence and correlates of initiation of smoking behavior among preteen black and white children.

Authors:  Nasar U Ahmed; Noushin S Ahmed; Kofi A Semenya; Jared D Elzey; Celia Larson; C Ray Bennett; Joseph E Hinds
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.798

7.  Risk factors for fragility fracture in middle age. A prospective population-based study of 33,000 men and women.

Authors:  A H Holmberg; O Johnell; P M Nilsson; J Nilsson; G Berglund; K Akesson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Early menopause: increased fracture risk at older age.

Authors:  D J M van Der Voort; P H M van Der Weijer; R Barentsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-30       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The effect of age, weight, and lifestyle factors on calcaneal quantitative ultrasound: the ESOPO study.

Authors:  Silvano Adami; Sandro Giannini; Ruben Giorgino; GianCarlo Isaia; Stefania Maggi; Luigi Sinigaglia; Paolo Filipponi; Gaetano Crepaldi; Ombretta Di Munno
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Bone mineral density at the hip in Norwegian women and men--prevalence of osteoporosis depends on chosen references: the Tromsø Study.

Authors:  Nina Emaus; Tone K Omsland; Luai Awad Ahmed; Guri Grimnes; Monica Sneve; Gro K Berntsen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 8.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.