Literature DB >> 17604666

Vertebral Fracture Assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: insurance coverage issues in the United States. A White Paper of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Andrew J Laster1, E Michael Lewiecki.   

Abstract

Clinical trial data and fracture risk prediction models unequivocally demonstrate the utility of identifying prevalent vertebral fractures to predict future fractures of all types. Knowledge of prevalent vertebral fractures can alter patient management decisions and result in initiation of therapy to reduce fracture risk in some patients who would not otherwise be treated. Cost-benefit analysis demonstrates that identifying and treating patients with vertebral fractures, even those with a densitometric classification of osteopenia, is cost effective. Vertebral fractures can be readily identified in the office setting using standard radiography or Vertebral Fracture Assessment (VFA), a software addition to a central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) machine. In the United States, VFA was assigned a Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code in January 2005. Nevertheless, coverage of VFA has not been uniformly embraced by Medicare carriers, companies that contract with the federal government to administer Medicare coverage and process claims for a region of the United States. Unlike DXA, for which uniform national coverage of qualified Medicare beneficiaries is mandated by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, VFA coverage policies are determined by the local Medicare carriers. Third-party insurers are also variable in their coverage of VFA. This International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) White Paper documents the role of VFA in the evaluation and treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis and compares it with standard spine radiography. Arguments used by some Medicare carriers and insurers to deny coverage of VFA in the United States are analyzed and critiqued. For health care providers within the United States, this White Paper may serve as a resource to respond to insurers who deny coverage of VFA. For health care providers regardless of their country, this article underscores the value of VFA as an alternative to spine radiography in the evaluation and management of postmenopausal women with suspected osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17604666     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  9 in total

1.  Osteoporosis onset differences between rural and metropolitan populations: correlation to fracture type, severity, and treatment efficacy.

Authors:  Thomas Pagonis; Panagiotis Givissis; Athanasios Pagonis; Georgios Petsatodis; Anastasios Christodoulou
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Combined vertebral fracture assessment and bone mineral density measurement: a patient-friendly new tool with an important impact on the Canadian Risk Fracture Classification.

Authors:  Pieter L Jager; Riemer H J A Slart; Colin L Webber; Jonathan D Adachi; Alexandra L Papaioannou; Karen Y Gulenchyn
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 2.248

Review 3.  [Pitfalls and difficulties in interpretation of bone densitometry].

Authors:  R Scholz; G Borte; G von Salis-Soglio; C-E Heyde
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Bisphosphonates for postmenopausal osteoporosis: determining duration of treatment.

Authors:  Piet Geusens
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) by lateral DXA scanning may be cost-effective when used as part of fracture liaison services or primary care screening.

Authors:  E M Clark; L Carter; V C Gould; L Morrison; J H Tobias
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Routine versus targeted vertebral fracture assessment for the detection of vertebral fractures.

Authors:  E T Middleton; S A Steel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Comparison of screening strategies for prevalent vertebral fractures in South Korea: vertebral fracture assessment vs. spine radiography.

Authors:  Sung-Hee Oh; Dam Kim; Young Eun Lee; Deog-Yoon Kim; Yu Kyung Lee; Joo-Hyun Lee; Sang-Cheol Bae; Yun Young Choi; Junhee Pyo; Jeonghoon Ahn; Yoon-Kyoung Sung
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Comparison of bone mineral density and vertebral fracture assessment in postmenopausal women with and without distal radius fractures.

Authors:  Tanawat Amphansap; Chayaphong Rattanaphonglekha; Jaruwat Vechasilp; Nitirat Stitkitti; Kamonchalat Apiromyanont; Atiporn Therdyothin
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2021-12-04

Review 9.  Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry: Beyond Bone Mineral Density Determination.

Authors:  Yong Jun Choi
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab (Seoul)       Date:  2016-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.