Literature DB >> 21667284

X-inactivation and X-reactivation: epigenetic hallmarks of mammalian reproduction and pluripotent stem cells.

Bernhard Payer1, Jeannie T Lee, Satoshi H Namekawa.   

Abstract

X-chromosome inactivation is an epigenetic hallmark of mammalian development. Chromosome-wide regulation of the X-chromosome is essential in embryonic and germ cell development. In the male germline, the X-chromosome goes through meiotic sex chromosome inactivation, and the chromosome-wide silencing is maintained from meiosis into spermatids before the transmission to female embryos. In early female mouse embryos, X-inactivation is imprinted to occur on the paternal X-chromosome, representing the epigenetic programs acquired in both parental germlines. Recent advances revealed that the inactive X-chromosome in both females and males can be dissected into two elements: repeat elements versus unique coding genes. The inactive paternal X in female preimplantation embryos is reactivated in the inner cell mass of blastocysts in order to subsequently allow the random form of X-inactivation in the female embryo, by which both Xs have an equal chance of being inactivated. X-chromosome reactivation is regulated by pluripotency factors and also occurs in early female germ cells and in pluripotent stem cells, where X-reactivation is a stringent marker of naive ground state pluripotency. Here we summarize recent progress in the study of X-inactivation and X-reactivation during mammalian reproduction and development as well as in pluripotent stem cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21667284      PMCID: PMC3744832          DOI: 10.1007/s00439-011-1024-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  142 in total

1.  Two-step imprinted X inactivation: repeat versus genic silencing in the mouse.

Authors:  Satoshi H Namekawa; Bernhard Payer; Khanh D Huynh; Rudolf Jaenisch; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Repressive and active histone methylation mark distinct promoters in human and mouse spermatozoa.

Authors:  Urszula Brykczynska; Mizue Hisano; Serap Erkek; Liliana Ramos; Edward J Oakeley; Tim C Roloff; Christian Beisel; Dirk Schübeler; Michael B Stadler; Antoine H F M Peters
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 3.  DNA double strand break repair, chromosome synapsis and transcriptional silencing in meiosis.

Authors:  Akiko Inagaki; Sam Schoenmakers; Willy M Baarends
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 4.528

4.  Phosphorylation stabilizes Nanog by promoting its interaction with Pin1.

Authors:  Matteo Moretto-Zita; Hua Jin; Zhouxin Shen; Tongbiao Zhao; Steven P Briggs; Yang Xu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Female human iPSCs retain an inactive X chromosome.

Authors:  Jason Tchieu; Edward Kuoy; Mark H Chin; Hung Trinh; Michaela Patterson; Sean P Sherman; Otaren Aimiuwu; Anne Lindgren; Shahrad Hakimian; Jerome A Zack; Amander T Clark; April D Pyle; William E Lowry; Kathrin Plath
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 24.633

6.  Derivation of pre-X inactivation human embryonic stem cells under physiological oxygen concentrations.

Authors:  Christopher J Lengner; Alexander A Gimelbrant; Jennifer A Erwin; Albert Wu Cheng; Matthew G Guenther; G Grant Welstead; Raaji Alagappan; Garrett M Frampton; Ping Xu; Julien Muffat; Sandro Santagata; Doug Powers; C Brent Barrett; Richard A Young; Jeannie T Lee; Rudolf Jaenisch; Maisam Mitalipova
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Human embryonic stem cells with biological and epigenetic characteristics similar to those of mouse ESCs.

Authors:  Jacob Hanna; Albert W Cheng; Krishanu Saha; Jongpil Kim; Christopher J Lengner; Frank Soldner; John P Cassady; Julien Muffat; Bryce W Carey; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A murine ESC-like state facilitates transgenesis and homologous recombination in human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Christa Buecker; Hsu-Hsin Chen; Jose Maria Polo; Laurence Daheron; Lei Bu; Tahsin Stefan Barakat; Patricia Okwieka; Andrew Porter; Joost Gribnau; Konrad Hochedlinger; Niels Geijsen
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 24.633

9.  Aberrant silencing of imprinted genes on chromosome 12qF1 in mouse induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Matthias Stadtfeld; Effie Apostolou; Hidenori Akutsu; Atsushi Fukuda; Patricia Follett; Sridaran Natesan; Tomohiro Kono; Toshi Shioda; Konrad Hochedlinger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  LINE-1 activity in facultative heterochromatin formation during X chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  Jennifer C Chow; Constance Ciaudo; Melissa J Fazzari; Nathan Mise; Nicolas Servant; Jacob L Glass; Matthew Attreed; Philip Avner; Anton Wutz; Emmanuel Barillot; John M Greally; Olivier Voinnet; Edith Heard
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  Gracefully ageing at 50, X-chromosome inactivation becomes a paradigm for RNA and chromatin control.

Authors:  Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 2.  Solving the "X" in embryos and stem cells.

Authors:  Pablo Bermejo-Alvarez; Priscila Ramos-Ibeas; Alfonso Gutierrez-Adan
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.272

3.  Derivation conditions impact X-inactivation status in female human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Kiichiro Tomoda; Kazutoshi Takahashi; Karen Leung; Aki Okada; Megumi Narita; N Alice Yamada; Kirsten E Eilertson; Peter Tsang; Shiro Baba; Mark P White; Salma Sami; Deepak Srivastava; Bruce R Conklin; Barbara Panning; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 24.633

4.  Xist imprinting is promoted by the hemizygous (unpaired) state in the male germ line.

Authors:  Sha Sun; Bernhard Payer; Satoshi Namekawa; Jee Young An; William Press; Jovani Catalan-Dibene; Hongjae Sunwoo; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Maintaining differentiated cellular identity.

Authors:  Johan Holmberg; Thomas Perlmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 6.  The sex bias in systemic sclerosis: on the possible mechanisms underlying the female disease preponderance.

Authors:  Fabio D'Amico; Evangelia Skarmoutsou; Maria Clorinda Mazzarino
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 7.  New and Xisting regulatory mechanisms of X chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  Yesu Jeon; Kavitha Sarma; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 8.  Epigenetic regulation in pluripotent stem cells: a key to breaking the epigenetic barrier.

Authors:  Akira Watanabe; Yasuhiro Yamada; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  What obesity research tells us about epigenetic mechanisms.

Authors:  Neil A Youngson; Margaret J Morris
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Generation and characterization of leukemia inhibitory factor-dependent equine induced pluripotent stem cells from adult dermal fibroblasts.

Authors:  Deanne J Whitworth; Dmitry A Ovchinnikov; Jane Sun; Patrick R J Fortuna; Ernst J Wolvetang
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.