Literature DB >> 21658188

Populations with elevated mutation load do not benefit from the operation of sexual selection.

B Hollis1, D Houle.   

Abstract

Theory predicts that if most mutations are deleterious to both overall fitness and condition-dependent traits affecting mating success, sexual selection will purge mutation load and increase nonsexual fitness. We explored this possibility with populations of mutagenized Drosophila melanogaster exhibiting elevated levels of deleterious variation and evolving in the presence or absence of male-male competition and female choice. After 60 generations of experimental evolution, monogamous populations exhibited higher total reproductive output than polygamous populations. Parental environment also affected fitness measures - flies that evolved in the presence of sexual conflict showed reduced nonsexual fitness when their parents experienced a polygamous environment, indicating trans-generational effects of male harassment and highlighting the importance of a common garden design. This cost of parental promiscuity was nearly absent in monogamous lines, providing evidence for the evolution of reduced sexual antagonism. There was no overall difference in egg-to-adult viability between selection regimes. If mutation load was reduced by the action of sexual selection in this experiment, the resultant gain in fitness was not sufficient to overcome the costs of sexual antagonism.
© 2011 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2011 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21658188      PMCID: PMC3156275          DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02323.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  27 in total

1.  Sexually selected traits and adult survival: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M D Jennions; A P Møller; M Petrie
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.875

2.  Sexual selection fails to promote adaptation to a new environment.

Authors:  Brett Holland
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Maternal effects on offspring depend on female mating pattern and offspring environment in yellow dung flies.

Authors:  Tom Tregenza; Nina Wedell; David J Hosken; Paul I Ward
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Natural selection in a bottle.

Authors:  David Houle; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-12-11       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Good genes and the maternal effects of polyandry on offspring reproductive success in the bulb mite.

Authors:  Magdalena Kozielska; Alina Krzemińska; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Effectiveness of sexual selection in preventing fitness deterioration in bulb mite populations under relaxed natural selection.

Authors:  J Radwan; J Unrug; K Snigórska; K Gawrońska
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Recessive lethal mutations.

Authors:  O Ohnishi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  EMS-induced polygenic mutation rates for nine quantitative characters in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  P D Keightley; O Ohnishi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  A Drosophila seminal fluid protein, Acp26Aa, stimulates egg laying in females for 1 day after mating.

Authors:  L A Herndon; M F Wolfner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The mutability of the minute loci of Drosophila melanogaster with ethyl methanesulfonate.

Authors:  S L Huang; B S Baker
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.433

View more
  19 in total

1.  The effect of parasites on sex differences in selection.

Authors:  N P Sharp; C M Vincent
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Sexual selection protects against extinction.

Authors:  Alyson J Lumley; Łukasz Michalczyk; James J N Kitson; Lewis G Spurgin; Catriona A Morrison; Joanne L Godwin; Matthew E Dickinson; Oliver Y Martin; Brent C Emerson; Tracey Chapman; Matthew J G Gage
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Competition for mates and the improvement of nonsexual fitness.

Authors:  Li Yun; Patrick J Chen; Kevin E Kwok; Christopher S Angell; Howard D Rundle; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  The consequences of polyandry for population viability, extinction risk and conservation.

Authors:  Luke Holman; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Male cognitive performance declines in the absence of sexual selection.

Authors:  Brian Hollis; Tadeusz J Kawecki
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  The physical environment mediates male harm and its effect on selection in females.

Authors:  Li Yun; Patrick J Chen; Amardeep Singh; Aneil F Agrawal; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Direct and indirect effects of male genital elaboration in female seed beetles.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Karl Grieshop; Cosima Hotzy; Johanna Rönn; Michal Polak; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Sex-differential selection and the evolution of X inactivation strategies.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Rapid adaptation to mammalian sociality via sexually selected traits.

Authors:  Adam C Nelson; Kevin E Colson; Steve Harmon; Wayne K Potts
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  No evidence that within-group male relatedness reduces harm to females in Drosophila.

Authors:  Brian Hollis; Tadeusz J Kawecki; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.