Literature DB >> 12683526

Maternal effects on offspring depend on female mating pattern and offspring environment in yellow dung flies.

Tom Tregenza1, Nina Wedell, David J Hosken, Paul I Ward.   

Abstract

Direct costs and benefits to females of multiple mating have been shown to have large effects on female fecundity and longevity in several species. However, with the exception of studies examining genetic benefits of polyandry, little attention has been paid to the possible effects on offspring of multiple mating by females. We propose that nongenetic effects of maternal matings on offspring fitness are best viewed in the same context as other maternal phenotype effects on offspring that are well known even in species lacking parental care. Hence, matings can exert effects on offspring in the same way as other maternal environment variables, and are likely to interact with such effects. We have conducted a study using yellow dung flies (Scathophaga stercoraria), in which we independently manipulated female mating rate, number of mates and maternal thermal environment and measured subsequent fecundity, hatching success, and offspring life-history traits. To distinguish between direct effects of matings and potential genetic benefits of polyandry we split broods and reared offspring at three different temperature regimes. This allowed us to demonstrate that although we could not detect any simple benefits or costs to matings, there are effects of maternal environment on offspring and these effects interact with female mating regime affecting offspring fitness. Such interactions between female phenotype and the costs and benefits of matings have potentially broad implications for understanding female behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12683526     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00264.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  10 in total

1.  The influence of maternal effects on indirect benefits associated with polyandry.

Authors:  Clarissa M House; Bronwyn H Bleakley; Craig A Walling; Thomas A R Price; Clare E Stamper; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Superior sperm competitors sire higher-quality young.

Authors:  D J Hosken; T W J Garner; T Tregenza; N Wedell; P I Ward
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Good genes and the maternal effects of polyandry on offspring reproductive success in the bulb mite.

Authors:  Magdalena Kozielska; Alina Krzemińska; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Populations with elevated mutation load do not benefit from the operation of sexual selection.

Authors:  B Hollis; D Houle
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Post-copulatory sexual selection and female fitness in Scathophaga stercoraria.

Authors:  Oliver Y Martin; David J Hosken; Paul I Ward
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Fitness consequences of female multiple mating: a direct test of indirect benefits.

Authors:  Miguel Barbosa; Sean R Connolly; Mizue Hisano; Maria Dornelas; Anne E Magurran
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Male competition and the evolution of mating and life-history traits in experimental populations of Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  Alima Qureshi; Andrew Aldersley; Brian Hollis; Alongkot Ponlawat; Lauren J Cator
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Genetic and potential non-genetic benefits increase offspring fitness of polyandrous females in non-resource based mating system.

Authors:  Jukka Kekäläinen; Geir Rudolfsen; Matti Janhunen; Lars Figenschou; Nina Peuhkuri; Niina Tamper; Raine Kortet
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Fluorescent sperm offer a method for tracking the real-time success of ejaculates when they compete to fertilise eggs.

Authors:  Rowan A Lymbery; W Jason Kennington; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Maternal response to environmental unpredictability.

Authors:  Miguel Barbosa; Isabel Lopes; Catia Venâncio; Maria João Janeiro; Michael Blair Morrisey; Amadeu M V M Soares
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.