Literature DB >> 15058393

Good genes and the maternal effects of polyandry on offspring reproductive success in the bulb mite.

Magdalena Kozielska1, Alina Krzemińska, Jacek Radwan.   

Abstract

Genetic benefits are potentially the most robust explanation of the controversial issue of evolutionary maintenance of polyandry, but the unambiguous demonstration of such benefits has been hindered by the possibility of their confusion with maternal effects. Previous research has shown that polyandrous bulb mite females produce daughters with higher fecundity than monandrous females. Here, we investigate whether this effect arises because polyandrous females invest more in their offspring, or because their offspring inherit 'good genes' from their fathers. Females were mated with either one or four (different) males. However, by sterilizing three of the four males with ionizing radiation, we eliminated any chance of sexual selection (in the polyandrous treatment) so that any differences in the female mating regimes must have been owing to maternal effects. Polyandry had no significant effect on daughter fecundity, thus indicating that any previously documented effects must have been genetic. This was further supported by a significant association between fathers' offensive sperm-competitive ability and the fecundity of their daughters. The association with fathers' sperm defensive ability was not significant, and neither was the association between fathers' sperm competitiveness and sons' reproductive success. However, sons of polyandrous females had lower reproductive success than sons of monandrous females. This shows that the maternal effects of polyandry should be taken into account whenever its costs and benefits are being considered.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15058393      PMCID: PMC1691577          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  19 in total

1.  Copulating with multiple mates enhances female fecundity but not egg-to-adult survival in the bruchid beetle Callosobruchus maculatus.

Authors:  P E Eady; N Wilson; M Jackson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Polyandry increases offspring fecundity in the bulb mite.

Authors:  M Konior; J Radwan; M Kolodziejczyk
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding.

Authors:  Tom Tregenza; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-14       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Superior sperm competitors sire higher-quality young.

Authors:  D J Hosken; T W J Garner; T Tregenza; N Wedell; P I Ward
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Polyandry and fitness of offspring reared under varying nutritional stress in decorated crickets.

Authors:  Scott K Sakaluk; Jennifer M Schaus; Anne-Katrin Eggert; W Andrew Snedden; Pamela L Brady
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Cryptic female choice in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria (L.).

Authors:  P I Ward
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Traumatic insemination and sexual conflict in the bed bug Cimex lectularius.

Authors:  A D Stutt; M T Siva-Jothy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Variation in sperm displacement and its association with accessory gland protein loci in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A G Clark; M Aguadé; T Prout; L G Harshman; C H Langley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  12 in total

1.  The influence of maternal effects on indirect benefits associated with polyandry.

Authors:  Clarissa M House; Bronwyn H Bleakley; Craig A Walling; Thomas A R Price; Clare E Stamper; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Sire attractiveness influences offspring performance in guppies.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans; Jennifer L Kelley; Angelo Bisazza; Elisabetta Finazzo; Andrea Pilastro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Offspring viability benefits but no apparent costs of mating with high quality males.

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Rebecca Holley
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Maternal effects due to male attractiveness affect offspring development in the zebra finch.

Authors:  L Gilbert; K A Williamson; N Hazon; J A Graves
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Maintenance of genetic variation in sexual ornaments: a review of the mechanisms.

Authors:  Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Strong association between a single gene and fertilization efficiency of males and fecundity of their mates in the bulb mite.

Authors:  Magdalena Konior; Jacek Radwan; Maria Kołodziejczyk; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Mating system affects population performance and extinction risk under environmental challenge.

Authors:  Agata Plesnar-Bielak; Anna M Skrzynecka; Zofia M Prokop; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Populations with elevated mutation load do not benefit from the operation of sexual selection.

Authors:  B Hollis; D Houle
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Egg size and offspring performance in the collared flycatcher ( Ficedula albicollis): a within-clutch approach.

Authors:  Milos Krist; Vladimír Remes; Lenka Uvírová; Petr Nádvorník; Stanislav Bures
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Rapid adaptation to mammalian sociality via sexually selected traits.

Authors:  Adam C Nelson; Kevin E Colson; Steve Harmon; Wayne K Potts
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.