Literature DB >> 21647869

The CAPRA-S score: A straightforward tool for improved prediction of outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

Matthew R Cooperberg1, Joan F Hilton, Peter R Carroll.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors previously developed and validated the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score to predict prostate cancer recurrence based on pretreatment clinical data. They aimed to develop a similar postsurgical score with improved accuracy via incorporation of pathologic data.
METHODS: A total of 3837 prostatectomy patients in the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE™) national disease registry were analyzed. Cox regression was used to determine the predictive power of preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), pathologic Gleason score (pGS), surgical margins (SM), extracapsular extension (ECE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and lymph node invasion (LNI). Points were assigned based on the relative weights of these variables in predicting recurrence. The new postsurgical score (CAPRA-S) was tested and compared with a commonly cited nomogram with proportional hazards analysis, concordance (c) index, calibration plots, and decision-curve analysis.
RESULTS: Recurrence appeared in 16.8% of the men; actuarial progression-free probability at 5 years was 78.0%. The CAPRA-S was determined by adding up to 3 points for PSA, up to 3 points for pGS, 1 point each for ECE and LNI, and 2 points each for SM and SVI. The hazard ratio for each point increase in CAPRA-S score was 1.54 (95% confidence interval, 1.49-1.59), indicating a 2.4-fold increase in risk for each 2-point increase in score. The CAPRA-S c-index was 0.77, substantially higher than 0.66 for the pretreatment CAPRA score and comparable to 0.76 for the nomogram. The CAPRA-S score performed better in both calibration and decision curve analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: The CAPRA-S offers good discriminatory accuracy, calibration, and ease of calculation for clinical and research settings.
Copyright © 2011 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21647869      PMCID: PMC3170662          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  32 in total

Review 1.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M W Kattan; T M Wheeler; P T Scardino
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Biostatistical modeling using traditional preoperative and pathological prognostic variables in the selection of men at high risk for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  J J Bauer; R R Connelly; I A Seterhenn; J Deausen; S Srivastava; D G McLeod; J W Moul
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  The CaPSURE database: a methodology for clinical practice and research in prostate cancer. CaPSURE Research Panel. Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor.

Authors:  D P Lubeck; M S Litwin; J M Henning; D M Stier; P Mazonson; R Fisk; P R Carroll
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  Endpoints in prostate cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Oliver Sartor
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Reliability of preoperative values to determine the need for lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer and meticulous lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Fiona C Burkhard; Pia Bader; Eric Schneider; Regula Markwalder; Urs E Studer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Misop Han; Alan W Partin; Marianna Zahurak; Steven Piantadosi; Johnathan I Epstein; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  The contemporary management of prostate cancer in the United States: lessons from the cancer of the prostate strategic urologic research endeavor (CapSURE), a national disease registry.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Jeanette M Broering; Mark S Litwin; Deborah P Lubeck; Shilpa S Mehta; James M Henning; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Validation of the Kattan preoperative nomogram for prostate cancer recurrence using a community based cohort: results from cancer of the prostate strategic urological research endeavor (capsure).

Authors:  Kirsten L Greene; Maxwell V Meng; Eric P Elkin; Matthew R Cooperberg; David J Pasta; Michael W Kattan; Katrine Wallace; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Prediction models in urology: are they any good, and how would we know anyway?

Authors:  Andrew Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  127 in total

1.  Perineural invasion is an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after local treatment: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yang Meng; Yan-Biao Liao; Peng Xu; Wu-Ran Wei; Jia Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

2.  Validation of a Genomic Risk Classifier to Predict Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality in Men with Adverse Pathologic Features.

Authors:  R Jeffrey Karnes; Voleak Choeurng; Ashley E Ross; Edward M Schaeffer; Eric A Klein; Stephen J Freedland; Nicholas Erho; Kasra Yousefi; Mandeep Takhar; Elai Davicioni; Matthew R Cooperberg; Bruce J Trock
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Genomic classifier identifies men with adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy who benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy.

Authors:  Robert B Den; Kasra Yousefi; Edouard J Trabulsi; Firas Abdollah; Voleak Choeurng; Felix Y Feng; Adam P Dicker; Costas D Lallas; Leonard G Gomella; Elai Davicioni; R Jeffrey Karnes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Comparative analysis of 1152 African-American and European-American men with prostate cancer identifies distinct genomic and immunological differences.

Authors:  Walter Rayford; Alp Tuna Beksac; Jordan Alger; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Mohsen Ahmed; Irtaza Khan; Ugo G Falagario; Yang Liu; Elai Davicioni; Daniel E Spratt; Edward M Schaeffer; Felix Y Feng; Brandon Mahal; Paul L Nguyen; Robert B Den; Mark D Greenberger; Randy Bradley; Justin M Watson; Matthew Beamer; Lambros Stamatakis; Darrell J Carmen; Shivanshu Awasthi; Jonathan Hwang; Rachel Weil; Harri Merisaari; Nihal Mohamed; Leslie A Deane; Dimple Chakravarty; Kamlesh K Yadav; Kosj Yamoah; Sujit S Nair; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-06-03

5.  Postoperative biochemical recurrence of pathologically localized high-grade prostate cancer in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.

Authors:  Ji Eun Heo; Jee Soo Park; Jong Soo Lee; Jongchan Kim; Won Sik Jang; Nam Hoon Cho; Koon Ho Rha; Young Deuk Choi; Sung Joon Hong; Won Sik Ham
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Development and Validation of a Novel Integrated Clinical-Genomic Risk Group Classification for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Daniel E Spratt; Jingbin Zhang; María Santiago-Jiménez; Robert T Dess; John W Davis; Robert B Den; Adam P Dicker; Christopher J Kane; Alan Pollack; Radka Stoyanova; Firas Abdollah; Ashley E Ross; Adam Cole; Edward Uchio; Josh M Randall; Hao Nguyen; Shuang G Zhao; Rohit Mehra; Andrew G Glass; Lucia L C Lam; Jijumon Chelliserry; Marguerite du Plessis; Voleak Choeurng; Maria Aranes; Tyler Kolisnik; Jennifer Margrave; Jason Alter; Jennifer Jordan; Christine Buerki; Kasra Yousefi; Zaid Haddad; Elai Davicioni; Edouard J Trabulsi; Stacy Loeb; Ashutosh Tewari; Peter R Carroll; Sheila Weinmann; Edward M Schaeffer; Eric A Klein; R Jeffrey Karnes; Felix Y Feng; Paul L Nguyen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Contemporary Role of the Decipher® Test in Prostate Cancer Management: Current Practice and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Deepansh Dalela; Björn Löppenberg; Akshay Sood; Jesse Sammon; Firas Abdollah
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2016

8.  A four-gene transcript score to predict metastatic-lethal progression in men treated for localized prostate cancer: Development and validation studies.

Authors:  Anqi Cheng; Shanshan Zhao; Liesel M FitzGerald; Jonathan L Wright; Suzanne Kolb; R Jeffrey Karnes; Robert B Jenkins; Elai Davicioni; Elaine A Ostrander; Ziding Feng; Jian-Bing Fan; James Y Dai; Janet L Stanford
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.104

9.  An analysis of a multiple biomarker panel to better predict prostate cancer metastasis after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Alison Y Zhang; Karen Chiam; Ygal Haupt; Stephen Fox; Simone Birch; Wayne Tilley; Lisa M Butler; Karen Knudsen; Clay Comstock; Krishan Rasiah; Judith Grogan; Kate L Mahon; Tina Bianco-Miotto; Carmela Ricciardelli; Maret Böhm; Susan Henshall; Warick Delprado; Phillip Stricker; Lisa G Horvath; James G Kench
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Combined value of validated clinical and genomic risk stratification tools for predicting prostate cancer mortality in a high-risk prostatectomy cohort.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Elai Davicioni; Anamaria Crisan; Robert B Jenkins; Mercedeh Ghadessi; R Jeffrey Karnes
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.