Literature DB >> 12544300

Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Misop Han1, Alan W Partin, Marianna Zahurak, Steven Piantadosi, Johnathan I Epstein, Patrick C Walsh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical followup for a large series of men with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy to identify clinical and/or pathological indicators of biochemical (prostate specific antigen [PSA]) recurrence. We then used those indicators to develop multivariate models for determination of recurrence probability following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1982 to 1999, 2,091 consecutive men underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate (clinical stage T1c or T2 disease with Gleason score 5 or greater). Actuarial analysis was performed comparing freedom from biochemical recurrence after radical retropubic prostatectomy (PSA 0.2 ng./ml. or greater.) using the Kaplan-Meier method. Event time distributions for the time to recurrence were compared using the log rank statistic or the Cox proportional hazards regression model. The first model was developed using preoperative variables only and the second model using all available variables. Observed and predicted recurrence-free survival curves for different models were compared to select a model for calculation of predicted recurrence-free probabilities and confidence intervals.
RESULTS: With a median followup of 5.9 years (range 1 to 17) 360 men (17%) had biochemical recurrence. Overall actuarial 5, 10 and 15-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rates were 84%, 72% and 61%, respectively. The relative risk of biochemical recurrence following surgery decreased with time, even after adjusted for other perioperative parameters. Variables identified for the preoperative model were biopsy Gleason score, clinical TNM stage and PSA. Variables identified for the postoperative model were prostatectomy Gleason score, PSA and pathological organ confinement status. Nomograms were generated and corrected for the decreasing relative risk of biochemical recurrence over time.
CONCLUSIONS: Using 3 preoperative or postoperative parameters, these nomograms can easily be used to determine the 3, 5, 7 and 10-year biochemical recurrence-free survival probabilities among men who undergo radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer in the modern era.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12544300     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000045749.90353.c7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  229 in total

1.  Use of tumor dynamics to clarify the observed variability among biochemical recurrence nomograms for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Guy Dimonte; E J Bergstralh; M E Bolander; R J Karnes; D J Tindall
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.104

2.  Persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen at six weeks after radical prostatectomy helps in early identification of patients who are likely to recur.

Authors:  François Audenet; Elise Seringe; Sarah J Drouin; Eva Comperat; Olivier Cussenot; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Progress of molecular targeted therapies for prostate cancers.

Authors:  Weihua Fu; Elena Madan; Marla Yee; Hongtao Zhang
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-11-29

4.  Androgen deprivation and thromboembolic events in men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Behfar Ehdaie; Coral L Atoria; Amit Gupta; Andrew Feifer; William T Lowrance; Michael J Morris; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Elena B Elkin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  [11C]Choline PET/CT detection of bone metastases in patients with PSA progression after primary treatment for prostate cancer: comparison with bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  Maria Picchio; Elena Giulia Spinapolice; Federico Fallanca; Cinzia Crivellaro; Giampiero Giovacchini; Luigi Gianolli; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  [Significance of neoadjuvant therapy before radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  R Paul; H Van Randenborgh; H Kübler; M Alschibaja; R Hartung
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Nuclear morphometry, nucleomics and prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Robert W Veltri; Christhunesa S Christudass; Sumit Isharwal
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.285

8.  PSA doubling time for prediction of [(11)C]choline PET/CT findings in prostate cancer patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Maria Picchio; Vincenzo Scattoni; Rita Garcia Parra; Alberto Briganti; Luigi Gianolli; Francesco Montorsi; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men receiving previous pelvic radiation for non-prostate malignancies.

Authors:  Timothy A Masterson; Alexei Wedmid; Jaspreet S Sandhu; James A Eastham
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Prostate cancer that is within 0.1 mm of the surgical margin of a radical prostatectomy predicts greater likelihood of recurrence.

Authors:  Jason P Izard; Lawrence D True; Philip May; William J Ellis; Paul H Lange; Bruce Dalkin; Daniel W Lin; Rodney A Schmidt; Jonathan L Wright
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.394

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.