Literature DB >> 31612318

Postoperative biochemical recurrence of pathologically localized high-grade prostate cancer in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.

Ji Eun Heo1, Jee Soo Park1, Jong Soo Lee1, Jongchan Kim1, Won Sik Jang1, Nam Hoon Cho2, Koon Ho Rha1, Young Deuk Choi1, Sung Joon Hong1, Won Sik Ham3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate biochemical recurrence (BCR) risk in men with localized prostate cancer (PC) of pathological Gleason score (pGS) 8-10. Although such patients have low BCR-free survival (BCRFS) following radical prostatectomy (RP), they are not recommended for adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) as per current guidelines.
METHODS: Among an adjuvant treatment-naïve cohort between 1995 and 2015, 1272 men were identified and categorized into group 1 [pGS7 (3 + 4) and pT3; n = 654], group 2 [pGS7 (4 + 3) and pT3; n = 408], and group 3 (pGS 8-10 and pT2; n = 210). The BCR risk of group 3 was compared with that of groups 1 and 2 who are the candidates for ART.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 60 months (interquartile range: 39-86), 432 men experienced BCR. BCRFS was lower in group 3 than in groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.021, respectively). In multivariate analysis, this association persisted and surgical margin (SM) was found to be a significant BCR predictor. Although statistically not significant, BCRFS was lower in group 3 with positive SM (PSM) than in group 2 with PSM (p = 0.101). BCRFS was significantly worse in group 3 with negative SM (NSM) than in group 1 with PSM (p = 0.038), while it was better in group 2 with PSM (p = 0.297).
CONCLUSION: Localized high-grade PC with PSM showed lower BCRFS and that with NSM showed better BCRFS without statistical significance than locally advanced GS 7 PC with PSM that are eligible for ART.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjuvant radiation therapy; Biochemical recurrence; Gleason score; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31612318     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-019-03049-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  27 in total

Review 1.  Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Michael S Cookson; Gunnar Aus; Arthur L Burnett; Edith D Canby-Hagino; Anthony V D'Amico; Roger R Dmochowski; David T Eton; Jeffrey D Forman; S Larry Goldenberg; Javier Hernandez; Celestia S Higano; Stephen R Kraus; Judd W Moul; Catherine Tangen; J Brantley Thrasher; Ian Thompson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Radical prostatectomy for pathological Gleason 8 or greater prostate cancer: influence of concomitant pathological variables.

Authors:  Weber K Lau; Erik J Bergstralh; Michael L Blute; Jeffrey M Slezak; Horst Zincke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Biochemical recurrence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mani Menon; Mahendra Bhandari; Nilesh Gupta; Zhaoli Lane; James O Peabody; Craig G Rogers; Jesse Sammon; Sameer A Siddiqui; Mireya Diaz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II: Treatment of Relapsing, Metastatic, and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Philip Cornford; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Erik Briers; Maria De Santis; Tobias Gross; Ann M Henry; Steven Joniau; Thomas B Lam; Malcolm D Mason; Henk G van der Poel; Theo H van der Kwast; Olivier Rouvière; Thomas Wiegel; Nicolas Mottet
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 5.  The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; Lars Egevad; Mahul B Amin; Brett Delahunt; John R Srigley; Peter A Humphrey
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.394

6.  Adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy: AUA/ASTRO Guideline.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Richard K Valicenti; Peter Albertsen; Brian J Davis; S Larry Goldenberg; Carol Hahn; Eric Klein; Jeff Michalski; Mack Roach; Oliver Sartor; J Stuart Wolf; Martha M Faraday
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  A V D'Amico; R Whittington; S B Malkowicz; D Schultz; K Blank; G A Broderick; J E Tomaszewski; A A Renshaw; I Kaplan; C J Beard; A Wein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-09-16       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Risk stratification of patients with extraprostatic extension and negative lymph nodes at radical prostatectomy: identifying optimal candidates for adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Manuel S Eisenberg; R Jeffrey Karnes; Dharam Kaushik; Laureano Rangel; Eric J Bergstralh; Stephen A Boorjian
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna K Pauler; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Lori M Minasian; Leslie G Ford; Scott M Lippman; E David Crawford; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Pathologic findings at radical prostatectomy: risk factors for failure and death.

Authors:  Gregory P Swanson; Mark Riggs; Michael Hermans
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.498

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.