Literature DB >> 9474185

Biostatistical modeling using traditional preoperative and pathological prognostic variables in the selection of men at high risk for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

J J Bauer1, R R Connelly, I A Seterhenn, J Deausen, S Srivastava, D G McLeod, J W Moul.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Biostatistical models predicting the risk of recurrence after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer are necessary. Identifying these high risk patients shortly after surgery, while tumor burden is minimal, makes them candidates for possible adjuvant therapy and/or investigational phase II clinical trials. This study builds on previously proposed models that predict the likelihood of early recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our analysis we evaluate age, race, prostatic acid phosphatase and nuclear grade with the established prognostic variables of pretreatment prostate specific antigen, postoperative Gleason sum and pathological stage.
RESULTS: After multivariable Cox regression analysis using only statistically significant variables that predicted recurrence we developed an equation that calculates the relative risk of recurrence (Rr) as: Rr = exp[(0.51 x Race) + (0.12 x PSAST) + (0.25 x Postop Gleason sum) + (0.89 x Organ Conf.). These cases are then categorized into 3 distinct risk groups of relative risk of recurrence of low (< 10.0), intermediate (10.0 to 30.0) and high (> 30.0). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of these 3 risk groups reveals that each category has significantly different risks of recurrence (p < 0.05). This model is validated with an independent cohort of radical prostatectomy patients treated at a different medical center by multiple primary surgeons.
CONCLUSIONS: This model suggests that race, preoperative prostate specific antigen, postoperative Gleason sum and pathological stage are important independent prognosticators of recurrence after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Race should be considered in future models that attempt to predict the likelihood of recurrence after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9474185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  12 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  S N Pentyala; J Lee; K Hsieh; W C Waltzer; A Trocchia; L Musacchia; M J Rebecchi; S A Khan
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  The CAPRA-S score: A straightforward tool for improved prediction of outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Joan F Hilton; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Differential expression of E-cadherin and P-cadherin in pT3 prostate cancer: correlation with clinical and pathological features.

Authors:  Catarina Ferreira; João Lobo; Luís Antunes; Paula Lopes; Carmen Jerónimo; Rui Henrique
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Formalized prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer: is it possible?

Authors:  Carvell T Nguyen; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Dynamic prediction of metastases after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Brant A Inman; Igor Frank; Stephen A Boorjian; Joseph W Akornor; R Jeffrey Karnes; Bradley C Leibovich; Michael L Blute; Eric J Bergstralh
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Molecular staging by RT-pCR analysis for PSA and PSMA in peripheral blood and bone marrow samples is an independent predictor of time to biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Constantine S Mitsiades; Peter Lembessis; Antigone Sourla; Constantine Milathianakis; Athanassios Tsintavis; Michael Koutsilieris
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 7.  Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.404

8.  Decreased expression of mucin 18 is associated with unfavorable postoperative prognosis in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Qi Bai; Li Liu; Qilai Long; Yu Xia; Jiajun Wang; Jiejie Xu; Jianming Guo
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-09-01

9.  Risk stratification for biochemical recurrence in men with positive surgical margins or extracapsular disease after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database.

Authors:  Jayakrishnan Jayachandran; Lionel L Bañez; Donna E Levy; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Joseph C Presti; Christopher L Amling; Christopher J Kane; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Patterns of practice in the United States: insights from CaPSURE on prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Jeanette M Broering; David M Latini; Mark S Litwin; Katrine L Wallace; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.