Literature DB >> 21642889

Variation of stereothreshold with random-dot stereogram density.

Liat Gantz1, Harold E Bedell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Reports of dissimilar stereothresholds for contour and random-dot (RD) targets may reflect differences in stimulus properties or differences between local and global stereoscopic processing mechanisms. In this study, we evaluated whether the stereothresholds obtained using low- and high-density RD stimuli are consistent with a distinction between local and global disparity processing.
METHODS: Stereothresholds were measured in eight normal subjects for a small disparate line segment superimposed on RD surrounds with densities that ranged between 0.07 and 28.3%.
RESULTS: Stereothresholds averaged 0.23 arc min for an RD density of 0.39% and approximately doubled for lower and higher densities. The increase in stereothresholds at low densities is likely because of the increased spacing between elements, which reduces their usefulness as a reference for relative disparity judgments. The increase in stereothresholds at high densities is attributed to a crowding effect.
CONCLUSIONS: Because the stereothresholds measured with RD stimuli of low and high density are limited by different constraints, they can be considered to be different types of stereotargets. However, because the stereothresholds measured for RD targets of varying densities are similar to those determined previously for a local, two-rod stereotarget, it is likely that all these stimuli are processed by a single disparity-processing mechanism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21642889      PMCID: PMC3163004          DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182217487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  48 in total

1.  Hyperacuity, superresolution and gap resolution in human stereopsis.

Authors:  S B Stevenson; L K Cormack; C M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Use of random-dot sterograms in the clinical assessment of strabismic patients.

Authors:  J P Frisby; J Mein; A Saye; A Stanworth
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Stereoscopic transparency: constraints on the perception of multiple surfaces.

Authors:  Inna Tsirlin; Robert S Allison; Laurie M Wilcox
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Positional averaging explains crowding with letter-like stimuli.

Authors:  John A Greenwood; Peter J Bex; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Spatio-temporal requirements for binocular correlation in stereopsis.

Authors:  M J Lankheet; P Lennie
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Target crowding in foveal and peripheral stereoacuity.

Authors:  G Westheimer; T T Truong
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1988-05

8.  Blurred visual stimuli. II. The effect of blurred visual stimuli on vernier and stereo acuity.

Authors:  G Stigmar
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1971

9.  Stereogram design for testing local stereopsis.

Authors:  G Westheimer; S P McKee
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Prominent ocular findings as an early manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  A M Mehta; T D France
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.402

View more
  4 in total

1.  Transfer of perceptual learning of depth discrimination between local and global stereograms.

Authors:  Liat Gantz; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The effect of dot size in random-dot stereograms on the results of stereoacuity measurements.

Authors:  Lingzhi Zhao; Huang Wu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.209

3.  An Evaluation of the Agreement Between a Computerized Stereoscopic Game Test and the TNO Stereoacuity Test.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Portela-Camino; Santiago Martín-González; Javier Ruiz-Alcocer; Igor Illarramendi-Mendicute; Rafaela Garrido-Mercado
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2021-07-05

4.  Relationship between stereopsis and vision-related quality of life in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Shohei Morikawa; Fumiki Okamoto; Tomoya Murakami; Yoshimi Sugiura; Takahiro Hiraoka; Yoshifumi Okamoto; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.