Literature DB >> 1191612

Use of random-dot sterograms in the clinical assessment of strabismic patients.

J P Frisby, J Mein, A Saye, A Stanworth.   

Abstract

Random-dot stereograms were shown to a sample of strabismic patients for whom there was clinical evidence of stereopsis. Two kinds of sterograms were used, one of the usual sort and the other having a contour surrounding the disparate area in each field of view. The patients tested could be clearly classified as belonging to one of three response groups. The first group could fuse both kinds of stereogram, the second could fuse only he contoured kind, and the third could not fuse either kind. This grouping was found to relate to the degree to which bifoveal binocular single vision had been absent in the clinical histories of these patients. The result is discussed in terms of the consequences for vergence and stereopsis of period of absence of normal binocular function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1191612      PMCID: PMC1017407          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.59.10.545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  2 in total

1.  A new stereoscopic test for amblyopia screening.

Authors:  R D Reinecke; K Simons
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  The representation of three-dimensional visual space in the cat's striate cortex.

Authors:  C Blakemore
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 5.182

  2 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Stereo vision and strabismus.

Authors:  J C A Read
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Vergence amplitudes with random-dot stereograms.

Authors:  S M Archer; K K Miller; E M Helveston; F D Ellis
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Variation of stereothreshold with random-dot stereogram density.

Authors:  Liat Gantz; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Stereopsis and spatial perception in amblyopes and uncorrected ametropes.

Authors:  W Kani
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Transfer of perceptual learning of depth discrimination between local and global stereograms.

Authors:  Liat Gantz; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Stereotest artifacts and the strabismus patient.

Authors:  S M Archer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Overestimation of stereo thresholds by the TNO stereotest is not due to global stereopsis.

Authors:  Kathleen Vancleef; Jenny C A Read; William Herbert; Nicola Goodship; Maeve Woodhouse; Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  Stereopsis in animals: evolution, function and mechanisms.

Authors:  Vivek Nityananda; Jenny C A Read
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Stereotest Comparison: Efficacy, Reliability, and Variability of a New Glasses-Free Stereotest.

Authors:  Alice Grasso McCaslin; Kathleen Vancleef; Luke Hubert; Jenny C A Read; Nicholas Port
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.283

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.