Literature DB >> 20600234

Transfer of perceptual learning of depth discrimination between local and global stereograms.

Liat Gantz1, Harold E Bedell.   

Abstract

Several previous studies reported differences when stereothresholds are assessed with local-contour stereograms vs. complex random-dot stereograms (RDSs). Dissimilar thresholds may be due to differences in the properties of the stereograms (e.g. spatial frequency content, contrast, inter-element separation, area) or to different underlying processing mechanisms. This study examined the transfer of perceptual learning of depth discrimination between local and global RDSs with similar properties, and vice versa. If global and local stereograms are processed by separate neural mechanisms, then the magnitude and rate of training for the two types of stimuli are likely to differ, and the transfer of training from one stimulus type to the other should be minimal. Based on previous results, we chose RDSs with element densities of 0.17% and 28.3% to serve as the local and global stereograms, respectively. Fourteen inexperienced subjects with normal binocular vision were randomly assigned to either a local- or global- RDS training group. Stereothresholds for both stimulus types were measured before and after 7700 training trials distributed over 10 sessions. Stereothresholds for the trained condition improve for approximately 3000 trials, by an average of 0.36+/-0.08 for local and 0.29+/-0.10 for global RDSs, and level off thereafter. Neither the rate nor the magnitude of improvement differ statistically between the local- and global-training groups. Further, no significant difference exists in the amount of improvement on the trained vs. the untrained targets for either training group. These results are consistent with the operation of a single mechanism to process both local and global stereograms. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20600234      PMCID: PMC2922406          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  58 in total

1.  Perceptual learning in primary and secondary motion vision.

Authors:  J M Zanker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Interindividual variability of learning in stereoacuity.

Authors:  Christina Schmitt; Miriam Kromeier; Michael Bach; Guntram Kommerell
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-07-24       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Cue combination and the effect of horizontal disparity and perspective on stereoacuity.

Authors:  Anna M Zalevski; G Bruce Henning; N Jeremy Hill
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2007

4.  Mechanisms of perceptual learning of depth discrimination in random dot stereograms.

Authors:  Liat Gantz; Saumil S Patel; Susana T L Chung; Ronald S Harwerth
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Interocular correlation, luminance contrast and cyclopean processing.

Authors:  L K Cormack; S B Stevenson; C M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The aperture problem in stereopsis.

Authors:  M J Morgan; E Castet
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  How contrast affects stereoacuity.

Authors:  D L Halpern; R R Blake
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Stereoscopic mechanisms in monkey visual cortex: binocular correlation and disparity selectivity.

Authors:  G F Poggio; F Gonzalez; F Krause
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Functional separation of global and local stereopsis investigated by cross-adaptation.

Authors:  D Rose; E Price
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Effects of practice and the separation of test targets on foveal and peripheral stereoacuity.

Authors:  M Fendick; G Westheimer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  5 in total

1.  Variation of stereothreshold with random-dot stereogram density.

Authors:  Liat Gantz; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Sharpening coarse-to-fine stereo vision by perceptual learning: asymmetric transfer across the spatial frequency spectrum.

Authors:  Roger W Li; Truyet T Tran; Ashley P Craven; Tsz-Wing Leung; Sandy W Chat; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  Dressmakers show enhanced stereoscopic vision.

Authors:  Adrien Chopin; Dennis M Levi; Daphné Bavelier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  An updated review about perceptual learning as a treatment for amblyopia.

Authors:  Antonio Rodán; Elena Candela Marroquín; Laura C Jara García
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2020-11-24

5.  Binocular disparity-based learning is retinotopically specific and independent of sleep.

Authors:  Jens G Klinzing; Lena Herbrik; Hendrikje Nienborg; Karsten Rauss
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 6.237

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.