Literature DB >> 19617570

Positional averaging explains crowding with letter-like stimuli.

John A Greenwood1, Peter J Bex, Steven C Dakin.   

Abstract

Visual crowding is a breakdown in object identification that occurs in cluttered scenes, a process that represents the principle restriction on visual performance in the periphery. When crowded objects are presented experimentally, a key finding is that observers frequently report nearby flanking items instead of the target. This observation has led to the proposal that crowding reflects increased noise in the positional code for objects; although how the presence of nearby objects might disrupt positional encoding remains unclear. We quantified this disruption using cross-like stimuli, where observers judged whether the horizontal target line was positioned above or below the stimulus midpoint. Overall, observers were poorer at judging position in the presence of crowding flankers. However, offsetting horizontal lines in the flankers also led observers to report that the horizontal line in the target was shifted in the same direction, an effect that held for subthreshold flanker offsets. In short, crowding induced both random and systematic errors in observers' judgment of position, with or without the detection of flanker structure. Computational modeling reveals that perceived position in the presence of flankers follows a weighted average of noisy target- and flanker-line positions, rather than a substitution of flanker-features into the target, as has been proposed previously. Together, our results suggest that crowding is a preattentive process that uses averaging to regularize the noisy representation of position in the periphery.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19617570      PMCID: PMC2711865          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0901352106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  43 in total

1.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision.

Authors:  L Parkes; J Lund; A Angelucci; J A Solomon; M Morgan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Perturbation model for letter identification.

Authors:  G Wolford
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Temporal and spatial interference with vernier acuity.

Authors:  G Westheimer; G Hauske
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The shape and size of crowding for moving targets.

Authors:  Peter J Bex; Steven C Dakin; Anita J Simmers
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  How many positions can we perceptually encode, one or many?

Authors:  R F Hess; G Barnes; S O Dumoulin; S C Dakin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Crowding and the tilt illusion: toward a unified account.

Authors:  Joshua A Solomon; Fatima M Felisberti; Michael J Morgan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-06-17       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Non-linear integration of crowded orientation signals.

Authors:  Carolina Gheri; Stefano Baldassi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Integration regions for visual hyperacuity.

Authors:  G Westheimer; S P McKee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition.

Authors:  H Bouma
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Interference with stereoscopic acuity: spatial, temporal, and disparity tuning.

Authors:  T W Butler; G Westheimer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  65 in total

1.  Substitution and pooling in crowding.

Authors:  Jeremy Freeman; Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The mechanism of word crowding.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Melanie M U Akau; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Visual crowding is correlated with awareness.

Authors:  Thomas S A Wallis; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Vision: seeing through the gaps in the crowd.

Authors:  David Whitney
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Object-level visual information gets through the bottleneck of crowding.

Authors:  Jason Fischer; David Whitney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Crowding is tuned for perceived (not physical) location.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; John A Greenwood; Thomas A Carlson; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Dissociable effects of attention and crowding on orientation averaging.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; Peter J Bex; John R Cass; Roger J Watt
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Dependence of reading speed on letter spacing in central vision loss.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Crowding changes appearance.

Authors:  John A Greenwood; Peter J Bex; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  A neurophysiologically plausible population code model for feature integration explains visual crowding.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Jos B T M Roerdink; Frans W Cornelissen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.