Literature DB >> 20673900

Effects of mechanical loading patterns, bone graft, and proximity to periosteum on bone defect healing.

Ulf R Knothe1, Scott Dolejs, R Matthew Miller, Melissa L Knothe Tate.   

Abstract

The goal of this study is to elucidate whether mechanobiological factors, including mechanical loading patterns, presence of bone graft, and proximity to the periosteum, correlate to de novo tissue generation and healing in critical sized long bone defects, which are enveloped by periosteum in situ and are bridged at 16 weeks, in sheep femora. Quantitative histomorphometric measures of defect cross sections show that, along the axis least able to resist bending loads (minor centroidal axis, CA), bone laid down in the first two weeks after surgery exhibits more mineralization albeit less total area compared to bone along the axis most able to resist bending loads (major CA). Similarly, areas of the cross section along the minor CA show a higher degree of perfusion albeit less total area of perfusion compared to bone along the major CA. Furthermore, proximity to the periosteal niche, in conjunction with the presence of bone graft and predominant loading patterns, relates significantly to the radial distribution of early bone apposition and perfusion of bone at 16 weeks after surgery (linear regression with R(2)>0.80). In the absence of graft, early bone density is relatively evenly distributed in the defect zone, as is the intensity of perfused tissue. As measured by a steeper average slope in intensity of fluorochrome (new bone) distribution between the periosteum and the IM nail, the presence of bone graft retards initial bone formation in the defect zone and is associated with less evenly distributed tissue perfusion (steeper slope) persisting 16 weeks after surgery. Finally, although the mean area of bone resorption is not significantly different within or between groups defined by the presence of graft and/or mechanical loading patterns in the defect zone, the mean area of infilling resorption spaces is significantly higher in areas of the defect zone least able to resist bending (minor CA) but is not significantly related to the presence of bone graft. To our knowledge, the use of the major and minor centroidal axes to relate prevailing mechanical loading patterns to area and density of early bone generation in bone defects has not been reported prior to this study and may provide a new means to assess structure-function relationships in de novo bone generation and healing of bone defects.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20673900     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.06.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  22 in total

1.  Anisotropic mechanical properties of ovine femoral periosteum and the effects of cryopreservation.

Authors:  Sarah H McBride; Sarah F Evans; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Net change in periosteal strain during stance shift loading after surgery correlates to rapid de novo bone generation in critically sized defects.

Authors:  Sarah H McBride; Scott Dolejs; Stefano Brianza; Ulf Knothe; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Current insights on the regenerative potential of the periosteum: molecular, cellular, and endogenous engineering approaches.

Authors:  Céline Colnot; Xinping Zhang; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 4.  Periosteum mechanobiology and mechanistic insights for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Melissa L Knothe Tate; Nicole Y C Yu; Iman Jalilian; André F Pereira; Ulf R Knothe
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-11-30

Review 5.  Elucidating multiscale periosteal mechanobiology: a key to unlocking the smart properties and regenerative capacity of the periosteum?

Authors:  Sarah F Evans; Hana Chang; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 6.  Concise review: the periosteum: tapping into a reservoir of clinically useful progenitor cells.

Authors:  Hana Chang; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 7.  Periosteum derived stem cells for regenerative medicine proposals: Boosting current knowledge.

Authors:  Concetta Ferretti; Monica Mattioli-Belmonte
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 8.  Multiscale mechanobiology of de novo bone generation, remodeling and adaptation of autograft in a common ovine femur model.

Authors:  Melissa L Knothe Tate; Scott Dolejs; Sarah H McBride; R Matthew Miller; Ulf R Knothe
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2011-03-16

9.  Translating Periosteum's Regenerative Power: Insights From Quantitative Analysis of Tissue Genesis With a Periosteum Substitute Implant.

Authors:  Shannon R Moore; Céline Heu; Nicole Y C Yu; Renee M Whan; Ulf R Knothe; Stefan Milz; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 6.940

10.  Major and minor centroidal axes serve as objective, automatable reference points to test mechanobiological hypotheses using histomorphometry.

Authors:  Sarah H McBride; Scott Dolejs; Ulf Knothe; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.