Literature DB >> 29510858

Masquelet technique: The effect of altering implant material and topography on membrane matrix composition, mechanical and barrier properties in a rat defect model.

Natalie Gaio1, Alice Martino1, Zacharie Toth1, J Tracy Watson1, Daemeon Nicolaou1, Sarah McBride-Gagyi2.   

Abstract

The Masquelet technique is a surgical procedure to regenerate segmental bone defects. The two-phase treatment relies on the production of a vascularized foreign-body membrane to support bone grafts over three times larger than the traditional maximum. Historically, the procedure has always utilized a bone cement spacer to evoke membrane production. However, membrane formation can easily be effected by implant surface properties such as material and topology. This study sought to determine if the membrane's mechanical or barrier properties are affected by changing the spacer material to titanium or roughening the surface finish. Ten-week-old, male Sprague Dawley rats were given an externally stabilized, 6 mm femur defect which was filled with a pre-made spacer of bone cement (PMMA) or titanium (TI) with a smooth (∼1 μm) or roughened (∼8 μm) finish. After 4 weeks of implantation, the membranes were harvested, and the matrix composition, tensile mechanics, shrinkage, and barrier function was assessed. Roughening the spacers resulted in significantly more compliant membranes. TI spacers created membranes that inhibited solute transport more. There were no differences between groups in collagen or elastin distribution. This suggests that different membrane characteristics can be created by altering the spacer surface properties. Surgeons may unknowingly effecting membrane formation via bone cement preparation techniques.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal model; Induced membrane; Masquelet technique; Membrane barrier properties; Membrane mechanics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29510858      PMCID: PMC5895482          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.02.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  70 in total

1.  Differences in bone-cement porosity by vacuum mixing, centrifugation, and hand mixing.

Authors:  William Macaulay; Christopher W DiGiovanni; Andres Restrepo; Khaled J Saleh; Heather Walsh; Lawrence S Crossett; Margaret G E Peterson; Stephen Li; Eduardo A Salvati
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  Bone cement.

Authors:  Raju Vaishya; Mayank Chauhan; Abhishek Vaish
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2013-12-15

Review 3.  Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate.

Authors:  Dennis E Discher; Paul Janmey; Yu-Li Wang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Osteocytes, mechanosensing and Wnt signaling.

Authors:  Lynda F Bonewald; Mark L Johnson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 5.  Immune responses to implants - a review of the implications for the design of immunomodulatory biomaterials.

Authors:  Sandra Franz; Stefan Rammelt; Dieter Scharnweber; Jan C Simon
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Effects of sera on bone resorption in tissue culture.

Authors:  E Hausmann; R Genco; N Weinfeld; R Sacco
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Res       Date:  1973-12-31

7.  Genomewide molecular and biologic characterization of biomembrane formation adjacent to a methacrylate spacer in the rat femoral segmental defect model.

Authors:  Helen E Gruber; Franklin K Gettys; Harvey E Montijo; James S Starman; Essraa Bayoumi; Kenneth J Nelson; Gretchen L Hoelscher; Warren K Ramp; Natalia Zinchenko; Jane A Ingram; Michael J Bosse; James F Kellam
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Mechanical properties of the periosteum in the pig, Sus scrofa.

Authors:  T E Popowics; Z Zhu; S W Herring
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.633

9.  Novel regulators of bone formation: molecular clones and activities.

Authors:  J M Wozney; V Rosen; A J Celeste; L M Mitsock; M J Whitters; R W Kriz; R M Hewick; E A Wang
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-12-16       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Osteogenic, stem cell and molecular characterisation of the human induced membrane from extremity bone defects.

Authors:  H E Gruber; G Ode; G Hoelscher; J Ingram; S Bethea; M J Bosse
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.853

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Bone defect treatment: does the type and properties of the spacer affect the induction of Masquelet membrane? Evidence today.

Authors:  Emmanouil Liodakis; Vassilis P Giannoudis; Stephan Sehmisch; Animesh Jha; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  The Masquelet Technique: Can Disposable Polypropylene Syringes be an Alternative to Standard PMMA Spacers? A Rat Bone Defect Model.

Authors:  Laurent Mathieu; James Charles Murison; Arnaud de Rousiers; Nicolas de l'Escalopier; Didier Lutomski; Jean-Marc Collombet; Marjorie Durand
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Introduction of a New Surgical Method to Improve Bone Healing in a Large Bone Defect by Replacement of the Induced Membrane by a Human Decellularized Dermis Repopulated with Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells in Rat.

Authors:  Maximilian Leiblein; Tobias Kolb; Lion Christian; Katrin Schröder; Ceyhan Yaman; Alexander Schaible; Ingo Marzi; Dirk Henrich; Maren Janko
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  The induced membrane technique in animal models: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hening Sun; Charles Godbout; Kalter Hali; Jovana Momic; Emil H Schemitsch; Aaron Nauth
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2022-03-10

Review 5.  Masquelet's induced membrane technique: Review of current concepts and future directions.

Authors:  Andrea I Alford; Daemeon Nicolaou; Mark Hake; Sarah McBride-Gagyi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacer usage combined with membrane induction in infected gap non-unions: A case series.

Authors:  Xinwei Liu; Guocheng Ding; Dapeng Zhou; Liangbi Xiang
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

7.  Effects of topical mechanical stability on the formation of Masquelet membrane in a rabbit radial defect model.

Authors:  Jie Xie; Donghao Liu; Haoyi Wang; Haitao Long; Yong Zhu; Yihe Hu; Min Zeng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Impact of scaffold granule size use in Masquelet technique on periosteal reaction: a study in rat femur critical size bone defect model.

Authors:  Maximilian Leiblein; Andreas Winkenbach; Elias Koch; Alexander Schaible; Hubert Büchner; Ingo Marzi; Dirk Henrich; Christoph Nau
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.693

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.