Literature DB >> 21629486

The clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody single level fusion.

Moon-Chan Kim1, Hung-Tae Chung, Dong-Jun Kim, Sang-Hyuk Kim, Sang-Ho Jeon.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This is a retrospective study that was done according to clinical and radiological evaluation.
PURPOSE: We analyzed the clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody single level fusion. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion is effective surgical method for treating degenerative lumbar disease.
METHODS: The study was conducted on 56 patients who were available for longer than 2 years (range, 24 to 45 months) follow-up after undergoing minimally invasive transforminal lumbar interbody single level fusion. Clinical evaluation was performed by the analysis of the visual analogue scale (VAS) score and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Kirkaldy-Willis score. For the radiological evaluation, the disc space height, the segmental lumbar lordotic angle and the whole lumbar lordotic angle were analyzed. At the final follow-up after operation, the fusion rate was analyzed according to Bridwell's anterior fusion grade.
RESULTS: For the evaluation of clinical outcomes, the VAS score was reduced from an average of 6.7 prior to surgery to an average of 1.8 at the final follow-up. The ODI was decreased from an average of 36.5 prior to surgery to an average of 12.8 at the final follow-up. In regard to the clinical outcomes evaluated by the Kirkaldy-Willis score, better than good results were obtained in 52 cases (92.9%). For the radiological evaluation, the disc space height (p = 0.002), and the whole lumbar lordotic angle (p = 0.001) were increased at the final follow-up. At the final follow-up, regarding the interbody fusion, radiological union was obtained in 54 cases (95.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: We think that if surgeons become familiar with the surgical techniques, this is a useful method for minimally invasive spinal surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lumbar interbody; Minimally invasive; Single level fusion; Transformainal

Year:  2011        PMID: 21629486      PMCID: PMC3095800          DOI: 10.4184/asj.2011.5.2.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Spine J        ISSN: 1976-1902


  14 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Kevin T Foley; Langston T Holly; James D Schwender
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results.

Authors:  Lars Hackenberg; Henry Halm; Viola Bullmann; Volker Vieth; Marc Schneider; Ulf Liljenqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion and plates.

Authors:  A D Steffee; D J Sitkowski
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymatic analysis.

Authors:  Y Kawaguchi; H Matsui; H Tsuji
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  S C Humphreys; S D Hodges; A G Patwardhan; J C Eck; R B Murphy; L A Covington
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach.

Authors:  Yung Park; Joong Won Ha
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Benjamin K Potter; Brett A Freedman; Eric G Verwiebe; Jordan M Hall; David W Polly; Timothy R Kuklo
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-08

8.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results.

Authors:  James D Schwender; Langston T Holly; David P Rouben; Kevin T Foley
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-02

9.  Radiographic results of single level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spine disease: focusing on changes of segmental lordosis in fusion segment.

Authors:  Sang-Bum Kim; Taek-Soo Jeon; Youn-Moo Heo; Woo-Suk Lee; Jin-Woong Yi; Tae-Kyun Kim; Cheol-Mog Hwang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-11-25

10.  Anterior fresh frozen structural allografts in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Do they work if combined with posterior fusion and instrumentation in adult patients with kyphosis or anterior column defects?

Authors:  K H Bridwell; L G Lenke; K W McEnery; C Baldus; K Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  10 in total

1.  Role of coflex as an adjunct to decompression for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Naresh Kumar; Siddarth M Shah; Yau Hong Ng; Vinodh Kumar Pannierselvam; Sudeep Dasde; Liang Shen
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-04-08

2.  Fusion rate and influence of surgery-related factors in lumbar interbody arthrodesis for degenerative spine diseases: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  M Formica; D Vallerga; A Zanirato; L Cavagnaro; M Basso; S Divano; L Mosconi; E Quarto; G Siri; L Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2020-01-01

3.  Outcome of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in spondylolisthesis-A clinico-radiological correlation.

Authors:  Vijay Anand Balasubramanian; Balaji Douraiswami; Suresh Subramani
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-02-24

4.  Comparison of the early results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in symptomatic lumbar instability.

Authors:  Najmus Sakeb; Kamrul Ahsan
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  Spinal tuberculosis: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Mohammad R Rasouli; Maryam Mirkoohi; Alexander R Vaccaro; Kourosh Karimi Yarandi; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2012-12-14

6.  Radiographic Results of Minimally Invasive (MIS) Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LIF) Compared with Conventional Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Jae Kwan Lim; Sung Min Kim
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2013-06-30

7.  [Minimally invasive extraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion].

Authors:  Federico Landriel; Santiago Hem; Jorge Rasmussen; Eduardo Vecchi; Claudio Yampolsky
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2018-01-22

Review 8.  Spinal Biologics in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Surgery.

Authors:  Kevin Y Chang; Wellington K Hsu
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2018-04-05

Review 9.  Allograft Versus Demineralized Bone Matrix in Instrumented and Noninstrumented Lumbar Fusion: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Zorica Buser; Darrel S Brodke; Jim A Youssef; Elke Rometsch; Jong-Beom Park; S Tim Yoon; Jeffrey C Wang; Hans-Joerg Meisel
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-10-25

10.  The clinical and radiological outcomes of multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Sang-Hyuk Min; Jae-Sung Yoo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.