Literature DB >> 29881153

Outcome of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in spondylolisthesis-A clinico-radiological correlation.

Vijay Anand Balasubramanian1, Balaji Douraiswami1, Suresh Subramani1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Lumbar spondylolisthesis is a common cause of morbidity in middle aged individuals. Spinal fusion with instrumentation has become the gold standard for lumbar segmental instability. Studies which correlate the improvement in radiology postoperatively with functional outcome show contrasting reports. This study is aimed at finding the correlation between clinical and radiological outcomes after surgery with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
METHODS: A retrospective study in 35 patients who underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in a period of 1 year was done. Preoperative pain (VAS Score), functional ability (ODI), radiological parameters (slip angle, slip grade, disc height, foraminal height, lumbar lordosis) were compared with postoperative recordings at the last followup. Functional improvement (Macnab's criteria) and fusion (Lee's fusion criteria) were assessed. Statistical analysis was done with student's paired t-test and Pearson's correlation coefficient.
RESULTS: VAS score, ODI improved from 8 to 2 and 70 to 15 respectively. Slip angle improved from 23°to 5° on an average. 80% patients showed fusion and 85% showed good clinical outcome at 1 year followup. Analyzing with Pearson correlation coefficient showed no significant relation between pain scores and radiological parameters. But there was statistically significant relation between radiological fusion and the final clinical outcome.
CONCLUSION: TLIF produces spinal fusion in most individuals. Strong spinal fusion is essential for good clinical outcome in spondylolisthesis patients who undergo TLIF. Reduction in slip is not necessary for all patients with listhesis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lumbar instability; Radiological improvement; Spinal fusion; TLIF

Year:  2018        PMID: 29881153      PMCID: PMC5990121          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  18 in total

1.  Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance.

Authors:  Patrick C Hsieh; Tyler R Koski; Brian A O'Shaughnessy; Patrick Sugrue; Sean Salehi; Stephen Ondra; John C Liu
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-10

2.  Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system: two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial.

Authors:  J W Brantigan; A D Steffee; M L Lewis; L M Quinn; J M Persenaire
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Transforaminal and posterior decompressions of the lumbar spine. A comparative study of stability and intervertebral foramen area.

Authors:  S G Osman; K Nibu; M M Panjabi; E B Marsolais; R Chaudhary
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The effect of lordosis, disc height change, subsidence, and transitional segment on stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using a nontapered threaded device.

Authors:  Kevin A Rahn; Robert M Shugart; Mark W Wylie; Kartheek K Reddy; Joseph A Morgan
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2010-12

5.  A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; M Townsend; L B Berman; J L Keller
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

Review 6.  Adult spondylolisthesis treated with posterolateral lumbar fusion and pedicular instrumentation with AO DC plates.

Authors:  J S Thalgott; R C Sasso; H B Cotler; M Aebi; S H LaRocca
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1997-06

7.  The clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody single level fusion.

Authors:  Moon-Chan Kim; Hung-Tae Chung; Dong-Jun Kim; Sang-Hyuk Kim; Sang-Ho Jeon
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2011-05-02

8.  Two-year outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Seng Yew Poh; Wai Mun Yue; Li-Tat John Chen; Chang-Ming Guo; William Yeo; Seang-Beng Tan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.118

9.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results.

Authors:  James D Schwender; Langston T Holly; David P Rouben; Kevin T Foley
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-02

10.  No correlation between slip reduction in low-grade spondylolisthesis or change in neuroforaminal morphology and clinical outcome.

Authors:  H S Hagenmaier; Diyar Delawi; Nico Verschoor; F Oner; Job L C van Susante
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  1 in total

1.  Long-term Radiological and Clinical Outcome after Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery in Patients with Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Prospective 6-Year Follow-up Study.

Authors:  Jan Bredow; Carolin Meyer; Stavros Oikonomidis; Constantin Kernich; Nikolaus Kernich; Christoph P Hofstetter; Vincent J Heck; Peer Eysel; Tobias Prasse
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 2.279

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.