Literature DB >> 8726197

Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymatic analysis.

Y Kawaguchi1, H Matsui, H Tsuji.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar surgery was studied by muscle histology and serum creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme activity.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate intraoperative factors influencing the magnitude of back muscle injury after posterior lumbar surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The authors previously have reported iatrogenic back muscle injury in an animal model and in humans. Serious injury of the back muscle has been shown by short-term and long-term follow-up evaluation.
METHODS: The retraction pressure was monitored, and the retraction pressure-time products were calculated in 24 patients. Early histologic changes of multifidus muscle, which were taken at completion of surgery, and serum creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme activity changes were examined.
RESULTS: The magnitude of back muscle injury was significant as the pressure-time product increased. Creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme activity increased after surgery and reached a plateau 1 day after surgery, followed by recovery to the normal value 1 week after surgery. Creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme activity tended to be high in cases with multilevel exposure and with high pressure-time product.
CONCLUSIONS: Back muscle injury occurs in all patients who underwent posterior lumbar surgery, and these injuries are related to the retraction pressure, time, and extent of exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8726197     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199604150-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  70 in total

1.  Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Yue Zhou; Zheng Feng Zhang; Chang Qing Li; Wen Jie Zheng; Jie Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Paradigm changes in spine surgery: evolution of minimally invasive techniques.

Authors:  Zachary A Smith; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 42.937

3.  Volume and fat infiltration of spino-pelvic musculature in adults with spinal deformity.

Authors:  Bertrand Moal; Nicolas Bronsard; José G Raya; Jean Marc Vital; Frank Schwab; Wafa Skalli; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-10-18

4.  The influence of surgical approach on outcome in Birmingham hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Callum W McBryde; Matthew P Revell; Andrew M Thomas; Ronan B Treacy; Paul B Pynsent
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using unilateral pedicle screws and a translaminar screw.

Authors:  Anil Sethi; Sandra Lee; Rahul Vaidya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Multifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open approach.

Authors:  ShunWu Fan; ZhiJun Hu; FengDong Zhao; Xing Zhao; Yue Huang; Xiangqian Fang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Muscle fibre size and type distribution in thoracic and lumbar regions of erector spinae in healthy subjects without low back pain: normal values and sex differences.

Authors:  A F Mannion; G A Dumas; R G Cooper; F J Espinosa; M W Faris; J M Stevenson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Comparison of superior-level facet joint violations during open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Ranjith Babu; Jong G Park; Ankit I Mehta; Tony Shan; Peter M Grossi; Christopher R Brown; William J Richardson; Robert E Isaacs; Carlos A Bagley; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; Oren N Gottfried
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Role of muscle damage on loading at the level adjacent to a lumbar spine fusion: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Masoud Malakoutian; John Street; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Ian Stavness; Marcel Dvorak; Sidney Fels; Thomas Oxland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Can intermuscular cleavage planes provide proper transverse screw angle? Comparison of two paraspinal approaches.

Authors:  Xiaofei Cheng; Bin Ni; Qi Liu; Jinshui Chen; Huapeng Guan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.