Literature DB >> 12897471

Minimally invasive lumbar fusion.

Kevin T Foley1, Langston T Holly, James D Schwender.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Review article.
OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of current techniques for minimally invasive lumbar fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Minimally invasive techniques have revolutionized the management of pathologic conditions in various surgical disciplines. Although these same principles have been used in the treatment of lumbar disc disease for many years, minimally invasive lumbar fusion procedures have only recently been developed. The goals of these procedures are to reduce the approach-related morbidity associated with traditional lumbar fusion, yet allow the surgery to be performed in an effective and safe manner.
METHODS: The authors' clinical experience with minimally invasive lumbar fusion was reviewed, and the pertinent literature was surveyed.
RESULTS: Minimally invasive approaches have been developed for common lumbar procedures such as anterior and posterior interbody fusion, posterolateral onlay fusion, and internal fixation. As with all new surgical techniques, minimally invasive lumbar fusion has a learning curve. As well, there are benefits and disadvantages associated with each technique. However, because these techniques are new and evolving, evidence to support their potential benefits is largely anecdotal. Additionally, there are few long-term studies to document clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary clinical results suggest that minimally invasive lumbar fusion will have a beneficial impact on the care of patients with spinal disorders. Outcome studies with long-term follow-up will be necessary to validate its success and allow minimally invasive lumbar fusion to become more widely accepted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12897471     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000076895.52418.5E

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  137 in total

Review 1.  Paradigm changes in spine surgery: evolution of minimally invasive techniques.

Authors:  Zachary A Smith; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  CT accuracy of percutaneous versus open pedicle screw techniques: a series of 1609 screws.

Authors:  Todd M Chapman; Daniel J Blizzard; Christopher R Brown
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Accuracy of thoracolumbar transpedicular and vertebral body percutaneous screw placement: coupling the Rosa® Spine robot with intraoperative flat-panel CT guidance--a cadaver study.

Authors:  M Lefranc; J Peltier
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-10-22

Review 4.  Rational decision making in a wide scenario of different minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion approaches and devices.

Authors:  Luiz Pimenta; Antoine Tohmeh; David Jones; Rodrigo Amaral; Luis Marchi; Leonardo Oliveira; Bruce C Pittman; Hyun Bae
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03

5.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and degenerative spondylosis: 5-year results.

Authors:  Yung Park; Joong Won Ha; Yun Tae Lee; Na Young Sung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Multifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open approach.

Authors:  ShunWu Fan; ZhiJun Hu; FengDong Zhao; Xing Zhao; Yue Huang; Xiangqian Fang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  A minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spine instabilities.

Authors:  C A Logroscino; L Proietti; E Pola; L Scaramuzzo; F C Tamburrelli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Comparison of bilateral versus unilateral decompression incision of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar diseases.

Authors:  Yongzhao Zhao; Yanjie Zhu; Hailong Zhang; Chuanfeng Wang; Shisheng He; Guangfei Gu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  A prospective clinical study comparing MI-TLIF with unilateral versus bilateral transpedicular fixation in low grade lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  José-Antonio Soriano-Sánchez; Javier Quillo-Olvera; Sergio Soriano-Solis; Miroslava-Elizabeth Soriano-Lopez; Claudia-Angélica Covarrubias-Rosas; Javier Quillo-Reséndiz; Carlos-Francisco Gutiérrez-Partida; Manuel Rodríguez-García
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-03

10.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Alan T Villavicencio; Sigita Burneikiene; Cassandra M Roeca; E Lee Nelson; Alexander Mason
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2010-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.