Literature DB >> 31894472

Fusion rate and influence of surgery-related factors in lumbar interbody arthrodesis for degenerative spine diseases: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

M Formica1, D Vallerga2, A Zanirato1, L Cavagnaro1, M Basso1, S Divano1, L Mosconi1, E Quarto1, G Siri3, L Felli1.   

Abstract

The aim of this meta-analysis and systematic review is to summarize and critically analyze the influence of surgery-related factors in lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spine diseases. A systematic review of the literature was carried out with a primary search being performed on Medline through PubMed. The 2009 PRISMA flowchart and checklist were taken into account. Sixty-seven articles were included in the analysis: 48 studies were level IV of evidence, whereas 19 were level III. All interbody fusion techniques analyzed have proved to reach a good fusion rate. An overall mean fusion rate of 93% (95% CI 92-95%, p < 0.001) was estimated pooling the selected studies. The influence of sagittal parameters and cages features in fusion rate was not clear. Autograft is considered the gold standard material. The use of synthetic bone substitutes and biological factors alone or combined with bone graft have shown conflicting results. Low level of evidence studies and high heterogeneity (χ2 = 271.4, df = 72, p < 0.001; I2 = 73.5%, τ2 = 0.05) in data analysis could result in the risk of bias. Further high-quality studies would better clarify these results in the future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Degenerative lumbar spinal surgery; Fusion rate; Lumbar interbody fusion; Non-union; Outcome; Risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31894472     DOI: 10.1007/s12306-019-00634-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg        ISSN: 2035-5114


  91 in total

1.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results.

Authors:  Lars Hackenberg; Henry Halm; Viola Bullmann; Volker Vieth; Marc Schneider; Ulf Liljenqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Which Approach Is Advantageous to Preventing Development of Adjacent Segment Disease? Comparative Analysis of 3 Different Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques (ALIF, LLIF, and PLIF) in L4-5 Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Chul-Woo Lee; Kang-Jun Yoon; Sang-Soo Ha
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases.

Authors:  Huaming Xue; Yihui Tu; Minwei Cai
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Bone Turnover Markers as a New Predicting Factor for Nonunion After Spinal Fusion Surgery.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Inose; Tsuyoshi Yamada; Mieradili Mulati; Takashi Hirai; Shuta Ushio; Toshitaka Yoshii; Tsuyoshi Kato; Shigenori Kawabata; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The efficacy of porous hydroxyapatite bone chip as an extender of local bone graft in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Hyoungmin Kim; Choon-Ki Lee; Jin-Sup Yeom; Jae-Hyup Lee; Ki-Ho Lee; Bong-Soon Chang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Extension CT scan: its suitability for assessing fusion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Hiroaki Nakashima; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Keigo Ito; Yumiko Horie; Masaaki Machino; Shunsuke Kanbara; Daigo Morita; Shiro Imagama; Naoki Ishiguro; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Radiographic assessment of interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2.

Authors:  J Kenneth Burkus; John D Dorchak; D Lynn Sanders
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterolateral instrumented fusion (PLF) in degenerative lumbar disorders: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kristian Høy; Cody Bünger; Bent Niederman; Peter Helmig; Ebbe Stender Hansen; Haisheng Li; Thomas Andersen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Minimally invasive surgical techniques in adult degenerative spinal deformity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Konrad Bach; Amir Ahmadian; Armen Deukmedjian; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Morphological analysis of interbody fusion following posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages using computed tomography.

Authors:  Dong Kwang Seo; Myeong Jong Kim; Sung Woo Roh; Sang Ryong Jeon
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Titanium (Ti) cages may be superior to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal interbody fusions using Ti versus PEEK cages.

Authors:  Jun-Hao Tan; Chin Kai Cheong; Hwee Weng Dennis Hey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Therapeutics for enhancement of spinal fusion: A mini review.

Authors:  Yidan Zhang; Yu Jiang; Da Zou; Baozhi Yuan; Hua Zhu Ke; Weishi Li
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  A Novel Calcium Phosphate-Based Nanocomposite for Augmentation of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation.

Authors:  Yuetian Wang; Chun Liu; Huiling Liu; Haoyong Fu; Chunde Li; Lei Yang; Haolin Sun
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2022-07-09

4.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of fusion rate enhancements and bone graft options for spine surgery.

Authors:  Wagner M Tavares; Sabrina Araujo de França; Wellingson S Paiva; Manoel J Teixeira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Comparison of the clinical efficacy of two fixation methods combined with OLIF in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis in adult patients.

Authors:  Xinliang Zhang; Yunshan Guo; Yibing Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Fat infiltration of paraspinal muscles as an independent risk for bone nonunion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Gengyu Han; Da Zou; Zexiang Liu; Bo Zhang; Chunjie Gong; Siyu Zhou; Wei Li; Zhuoran Sun; Weishi Li
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 7.  Influence of the geometric and material properties of lumbar endplate on lumbar interbody fusion failure: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yihang Yu; Dale L Robinson; David C Ackland; Yi Yang; Peter Vee Sin Lee
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 8.  Understanding the Future Prospects of Synergizing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery with Ceramics and Regenerative Cellular Therapies.

Authors:  Wen-Cheng Lo; Lung-Wen Tsai; Yi-Shan Yang; Ryan Wing Yuk Chan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.