Literature DB >> 21622051

Microbubble sizing and shell characterization using flow cytometry.

Juan Tu1, Jarred E Swalwell, David Giraud, Weicheng Cui, Weizhong Chen, Thomas J Matula.   

Abstract

Experiments were performed to size, count, and obtain shell parameters for individual ultrasound contrast microbubbles using a modified flow cytometer. Light scattering was modeled using Mie theory, and applied to calibration beads to calibrate the system. The size distribution and population were measured directly from the flow cytometer. The shell parameters (shear modulus and shear viscosity) were quantified at different acoustic pressures (from 95 to 333 kPa) by fitting microbubble response data to a bubble dynamics model. The size distribution of the contrast agent microbubbles is consistent with manufacturer specifications. The shell shear viscosity increases with increasing equilibrium microbubble size, and decreases with increasing shear rate. The observed trends are independent of driving pressure amplitude. The shell elasticity does not vary with microbubble size. The results suggest that a modified flow cytometer can be an effective tool to characterize the physical properties of microbubbles, including size distribution, population, and shell parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21622051      PMCID: PMC4495763          DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2011.1896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  14 in total

1.  Influence of bubble size distribution on the echogenicity of ultrasound contrast agents: a study of SonoVue.

Authors:  J M Gorce; M Arditi; M Schneider
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  A Newtonian rheological model for the interface of microbubble contrast agents.

Authors:  Dhiman Chatterjee; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  On the destruction of microbubble ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Eleanor Stride; Nader Saffari
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Using light scattering to measure the response of individual ultrasound contrast microbubbles subjected to pulsed ultrasound in vitro.

Authors:  Jingfeng Guan; Thomas J Matula
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Healing sound: the use of ultrasound in drug delivery and other therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Samir Mitragotri
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  Microbubble spectroscopy of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Sander M van der Meer; Benjamin Dollet; Marco M Voormolen; Chien T Chin; Ayache Bouakaz; Nico de Jong; Michel Versluis; Detlef Lohse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Optical and acoustical observations of the effects of ultrasound on contrast agents.

Authors:  P A Dayton; K E Morgan; A L Klibanov; G H Brandenburger; K W Ferrara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Modeling of nonlinear viscous stress in encapsulating shells of lipid-coated contrast agent microbubbles.

Authors:  Alexander A Doinikov; Jillian F Haac; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 2.890

9.  Estimating the shell parameters of SonoVue microbubbles using light scattering.

Authors:  Juan Tu; Jingfeng Guan; Yuanyuan Qiu; Thomas J Matula
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Erratum: transient pulsations of small gas bubbles in water [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, 985-998 (1988)] [corrected and republished].

Authors:  H G Flynn; C C Church
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  10 in total

1.  Individual lipid encapsulated microbubble radial oscillations: Effects of fluid viscosity.

Authors:  Brandon Helfield; Xucai Chen; Bin Qin; Flordeliza S Villanueva
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Mechanisms of microbubble-vessel interactions and induced stresses: a numerical study.

Authors:  N Hosseinkhah; H Chen; T J Matula; P N Burns; K Hynynen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Impulse response method for characterization of echogenic liposomes.

Authors:  Jason L Raymond; Ying Luan; Tom van Rooij; Klazina Kooiman; Shao-Ling Huang; David D McPherson; Michel Versluis; Nico de Jong; Christy K Holland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Microbubbles and ultrasound increase intraventricular polyplex gene transfer to the brain.

Authors:  James-Kevin Y Tan; Binhan Pham; Yujin Zong; Camilo Perez; Don O Maris; Ashton Hemphill; Carol H Miao; Thomas J Matula; Pierre D Mourad; Hua Wei; Drew L Sellers; Philip J Horner; Suzie H Pun
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 9.776

5.  Encapsulated microbubbles and echogenic liposomes for contrast ultrasound imaging and targeted drug delivery.

Authors:  Shirshendu Paul; Rahul Nahire; Sanku Mallik; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  Comput Mech       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.014

6.  Microbubbles and blood-brain barrier opening: a numerical study on acoustic emissions and wall stress predictions.

Authors:  Nazanin Hosseinkhah; David E Goertz; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 7.  Towards controlled drug delivery in brain tumors with microbubble-enhanced focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Scott Schoen; M Sait Kilinc; Hohyun Lee; Yutong Guo; F Levent Degertekin; Graeme F Woodworth; Costas Arvanitis
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 15.470

8.  Toward Precisely Controllable Acoustic Response of Shell-Stabilized Nanobubbles: High Yield and Narrow Dispersity.

Authors:  Amin Jafari Sojahrood; Al C de Leon; Richard Lee; Michaela Cooley; Eric C Abenojar; Michael C Kolios; Agata A Exner
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 15.881

9.  Pulsating Microbubble in a Micro-vessel and Mechanical Effect on Vessel Wall: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Zahra Khodabakhshi; Nazanin Hosseinkhah; Hossein Ghadiri
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2021-10-01

10.  Quantitative Three-Dimensional Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: First-In-Human Pilot Study in Patients with Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Ahmed El Kaffas; Rosa Maria Silveira Sigrist; George Fisher; Sunitha Bachawal; Joy Liau; Huaijun Wang; Alexander Karanany; Isabelle Durot; Jarrett Rosenberg; Dimitre Hristov; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 11.556

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.