Literature DB >> 26827018

Individual lipid encapsulated microbubble radial oscillations: Effects of fluid viscosity.

Brandon Helfield1, Xucai Chen1, Bin Qin1, Flordeliza S Villanueva1.   

Abstract

Ultrasound-stimulated microbubble dynamics have been shown to be dependent on intrinsic bubble properties, including size and shell characteristics. The effect of the surrounding environment on microbubble response, however, has been less investigated. In particular, microbubble optimization studies are generally conducted in water/saline, characterized by a 1 cP viscosity, for application in the vasculature (i.e., 4 cP). In this study, ultra-high speed microscopy was employed to investigate fluid viscosity effects on phospholipid encapsulated microbubble oscillations at 1 MHz, using a single, eight-cycle pulse at peak negative pressures of 100 and 250 kPa. Microbubble oscillations were shown to be affected by fluid viscosity in a size- and pressure-dependent manner. In general, the oscillation amplitudes exhibited by microbubbles between 3 and 6 μm in 1 cP fluid were larger than in 4 cP fluid, reaching a maximum of 1.7-fold at 100 kPa for microbubbles 3.8 μm in diameter and 1.35-fold at 250 kPa for microbubbles 4.8 μm in diameter. Simulation results were in broad agreement at 250 kPa, however generally underestimated the effect of fluid viscosity at 100 kPa. This is the first experimental demonstration documenting the effects of surrounding fluid viscosity on microbubble oscillations, resulting in behavior not entirely predicted by current microbubble models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26827018      PMCID: PMC4714991          DOI: 10.1121/1.4939123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  40 in total

1.  Dynamics of gas bubbles in viscoelastic fluids. II. Nonlinear viscoelasticity.

Authors:  J S Allen; R A Roy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Modulating targeted adhesion of an ultrasound contrast agent to dysfunctional endothelium.

Authors:  Gregory E R Weller; Flordeliza S Villanueva; Alexander L Klibanov; William R Wagner
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Acoustic scattering from a contrast agent microbubble near an elastic wall of finite thickness.

Authors:  Alexander A Doinikov; Leila Aired; Ayache Bouakaz
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements.

Authors:  N de Jong; L Hoff; T Skotland; N Bom
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  Microbubble spectroscopy of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Sander M van der Meer; Benjamin Dollet; Marco M Voormolen; Chien T Chin; Ayache Bouakaz; Nico de Jong; Michel Versluis; Detlef Lohse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Acoustic characterization of single ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.

Authors:  Jeroen Sijl; Emmanuel Gaud; Peter J A Frinking; Marcel Arditi; Nico de Jong; Detlef Lohse; Michel Versluis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Mapping microbubble viscosity using fluorescence lifetime imaging of molecular rotors.

Authors:  Neveen A Hosny; Graciela Mohamedi; Paul Rademeyer; Joshua Owen; Yilei Wu; Meng-Xing Tang; Robert J Eckersley; Eleanor Stride; Marina K Kuimova
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Impulse response method for characterization of echogenic liposomes.

Authors:  Jason L Raymond; Ying Luan; Tom van Rooij; Klazina Kooiman; Shao-Ling Huang; David D McPherson; Michel Versluis; Nico de Jong; Christy K Holland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  American Society of Echocardiography Consensus Statement on the Clinical Applications of Ultrasonic Contrast Agents in Echocardiography.

Authors:  Sharon L Mulvagh; Harry Rakowski; Mani A Vannan; Sahar S Abdelmoneim; Harald Becher; S Michelle Bierig; Peter N Burns; Ramon Castello; Patrick D Coon; Mary E Hagen; James G Jollis; Thomas R Kimball; Dalane W Kitzman; Itzhak Kronzon; Arthur J Labovitz; Roberto M Lang; Joseph Mathew; W Stuart Moir; Sherif F Nagueh; Alan S Pearlman; Julio E Perez; Thomas R Porter; Judy Rosenbloom; G Monet Strachan; Srihari Thanigaraj; Kevin Wei; Anna Woo; Eric H C Yu; William A Zoghbi
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.251

10.  A Targeting Microbubble for Ultrasound Molecular Imaging.

Authors:  James Shue-Min Yeh; Charles A Sennoga; Ellen McConnell; Robert Eckersley; Meng-Xing Tang; Sussan Nourshargh; John M Seddon; Dorian O Haskard; Petros Nihoyannopoulos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Assessment of the Superharmonic Response of Microbubble Contrast Agents for Acoustic Angiography as a Function of Microbubble Parameters.

Authors:  Isabel G Newsome; Thomas M Kierski; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Loss of gas from echogenic liposomes exposed to pulsed ultrasound.

Authors:  Jason L Raymond; Ying Luan; Tao Peng; Shao-Ling Huang; David D McPherson; Michel Versluis; Nico de Jong; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Mechanistic Insight into Sonoporation with Ultrasound-Stimulated Polymer Microbubbles.

Authors:  Brandon L Helfield; Xucai Chen; Bin Qin; Simon C Watkins; Flordeliza S Villanueva
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Prolonging pulse duration in ultrasound-mediated gene delivery lowers acoustic pressure threshold for efficient gene transfer to cells and small animals.

Authors:  Dominic M Tran; James Harrang; Shuxian Song; Jeremy Chen; Bryn M Smith; Carol H Miao
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 5.  The Role of NADPH Oxidases in the Etiology of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome: Contribution of Individual Isoforms and Cell Biology.

Authors:  Evan DeVallance; Yao Li; Michael J Jurczak; Eugenia Cifuentes-Pagano; Patrick J Pagano
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 8.401

6.  Characterization of the interaction of nanobubble ultrasound contrast agents with human blood components.

Authors:  Michaela B Cooley; Eric C Abenojar; Dana Wegierak; Anirban Sen Gupta; Michael C Kolios; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-05-11

7.  Effect of Thrombus Composition and Viscosity on Sonoreperfusion Efficacy in a Model of Micro-Vascular Obstruction.

Authors:  John J Black; Francois T H Yu; Rick G Schnatz; Xucai Chen; Flordeliza S Villanueva; John J Pacella
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Effect of Acoustic Parameters and Microbubble Concentration on the Likelihood of Encapsulated Microbubble Coalescence.

Authors:  David Q Le; Virginie Papadopoulou; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 3.694

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.