Literature DB >> 26860281

Microbubbles and ultrasound increase intraventricular polyplex gene transfer to the brain.

James-Kevin Y Tan1, Binhan Pham1, Yujin Zong2, Camilo Perez3, Don O Maris4, Ashton Hemphill1, Carol H Miao5, Thomas J Matula6, Pierre D Mourad4, Hua Wei7, Drew L Sellers1, Philip J Horner8, Suzie H Pun9.   

Abstract

Neurons in the brain can be damaged or lost from neurodegenerative disease, stroke, or traumatic injury. Although neurogenesis occurs in mammalian adult brains, the levels of natural neurogenesis are insufficient to restore function in these cases. Gene therapy has been pursued as a promising strategy to induce differentiation of neural progenitor cells into functional neurons. Non-viral vectors are a preferred method of gene transfer due to potential safety and manufacturing benefits but suffer from lower delivery efficiencies compared to viral vectors. Since the neural stem and progenitor cells reside in the subventricular zone of the brain, intraventricular injection has been used as an administration route for gene transfer to these cells. However, the choroid plexus epithelium remains an obstacle to delivery. Recently, transient disruption of the blood-brain barrier by microbubble-enhanced ultrasound has been used to successfully improve drug delivery to the brain after intravenous injection. In this work, we demonstrate that microbubble-enhanced ultrasound can similarly improve gene transfer to the subventricular zone after intraventricular injection. Microbubbles of different surface charges (neutral, slightly cationic, and cationic) were prepared, characterized by acoustic flow cytometry, and evaluated for their ability to increase the permeability of immortalized choroid plexus epithelium monolayers in vitro. Based on these results, slightly cationic microbubbles were evaluated for microbubble and ultrasound-mediated enhancement of non-viral gene transfer in vivo. When coupled with our previously reported gene delivery vehicles, the slightly cationic microbubbles significantly increased ultrasound-mediated transfection of the murine brain when compared to commercially available Definity® microbubbles. Temporary disruption of the choroid plexus by microbubble-enhanced ultrasound is therefore a viable way of enhancing gene delivery to the brain and merits further research.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Choroid plexus epithelium; Gene delivery; In vivo; Microbubble; Polyplex; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26860281      PMCID: PMC4944389          DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  48 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound, microbubbles and the blood-brain barrier.

Authors:  Stephen Meairs; Angelika Alonso
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 3.667

2.  Modeling of nonlinear viscous stress in encapsulating shells of lipid-coated contrast agent microbubbles.

Authors:  Alexander A Doinikov; Jillian F Haac; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Mechanical characterization of ultrasonically synthesized microbubble shells by flow cytometry and AFM.

Authors:  Francesca Cavalieri; James P Best; Camilo Perez; Juan Tu; Frank Caruso; Thomas J Matula; Muthupandian Ashokkumar
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 4.  The choroid plexus: a comprehensive review of its history, anatomy, function, histology, embryology, and surgical considerations.

Authors:  Martin M Mortazavi; Christoph J Griessenauer; Nimer Adeeb; Aman Deep; Reza Bavarsad Shahripour; Reza Bavarsad Shahripour; Marios Loukas; Richard Isaiah Tubbs; R Shane Tubbs
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Enhanced delivery and bioactivity of the neurturin neurotrophic factor through focused ultrasound-mediated blood--brain barrier opening in vivo.

Authors:  Gesthimani Samiotaki; Camilo Acosta; Shutao Wang; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 6.200

6.  Stem and progenitor cell-based therapy of the human central nervous system.

Authors:  Steve Goldman
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Effects of transcranial ultrasound and intravenous microbubbles on blood brain barrier permeability in a large animal model.

Authors:  Feng Xie; Michael D Boska; John Lof; Mariano G Uberti; Jeane M Tsutsui; Thomas R Porter
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Influence of shell composition on the resonance frequency of microbubble contrast agents.

Authors:  Stephen Dicker; Michał Mleczko; Monica Siepmann; Nicole Wallace; Youhan Sunny; Christopher R Bawiec; Georg Schmitz; Peter Lewin; Steven P Wrenn
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 9.  Ultrasound and microbubble-mediated gene delivery in cancer: progress and perspectives.

Authors:  Cedric M Panje; David S Wang; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  Establishment and characterization of an immortalized Z310 choroidal epithelial cell line from murine choroid plexus.

Authors:  Wei Zheng; Qiuqu Zhao
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2002-12-27       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Destination Brain: the Past, Present, and Future of Therapeutic Gene Delivery.

Authors:  Chaitanya R Joshi; Vinod Labhasetwar; Anuja Ghorpade
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Ultrasound Molecular Imaging and Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Charles F Caskey
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  Towards controlled drug delivery in brain tumors with microbubble-enhanced focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Scott Schoen; M Sait Kilinc; Hohyun Lee; Yutong Guo; F Levent Degertekin; Graeme F Woodworth; Costas Arvanitis
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 15.470

4.  Polyplex transfection from intracerebroventricular delivery is not significantly affected by traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  David J Peeler; Nicholas Luera; Philip J Horner; Suzie H Pun; Drew L Sellers
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 5.  Non-Viral Nucleic Acid Delivery Strategies to the Central Nervous System.

Authors:  James-Kevin Y Tan; Drew L Sellers; Binhan Pham; Suzie H Pun; Philip J Horner
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 5.639

6.  The Microvascular Gap Junction Channel: A Route to Deliver MicroRNAs for Neurological Disease Treatment.

Authors:  Dominique Thuringer; Eric Solary; Carmen Garrido
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.639

Review 7.  Applications of Ultrasound to Stimulate Therapeutic Revascularization.

Authors:  Catherine M Gorick; John C Chappell; Richard J Price
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Use of a Lymphatic Drug Delivery System and Sonoporation to Target Malignant Metastatic Breast Cancer Cells Proliferating in the Marginal Sinuses.

Authors:  Shigeki Kato; Yuko Shirai; Maya Sakamoto; Shiro Mori; Tetsuya Kodama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  In vivo methods for acute modulation of gene expression in the central nervous system.

Authors:  Andrzej W Cwetsch; Bruno Pinto; Annalisa Savardi; Laura Cancedda
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2018-04-22       Impact factor: 11.685

10.  Transcutaneous Ultrasound-Mediated Nonviral Gene Delivery to the Liver in a Porcine Model.

Authors:  Dominic M Tran; Feng Zhang; Kyle P Morrison; Keith R Loeb; James Harrang; Masaki Kajimoto; Francisco Chavez; Li Wu; Carol H Miao
Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 6.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.