Literature DB >> 21619071

Computational model for predicting experimental RNA and DNA nearest-neighbor free energy rankings.

Charles A Johnson1, Richard J Bloomingdale, Vikram E Ponnusamy, Conor A Tillinghast, Brent M Znosko, Michael Lewis.   

Abstract

Hydrogen-bonding, intrastrand base-stacking, and interstrand base-stacking energies were calculated for RNA and DNA dimers at the MP2(full)/6-311G** level of theory. Standard A-form RNA and B-form DNA geometries from average fiber diffraction data were employed for all base monomer and dimer geometries, and all dimer binding energies were obtained via single-point calculations. The effects of water solvation were considered using the PCM model. The resulting dimer binding energies were used to calculate the 10 unique RNA and 10 unique DNA computational nearest-neighbor energies, and the ranking of these computational nearest neighbor energies are in excellent agreement with the ranking of the experimental nearest-neighbor free energies. These results dispel the notion that average fiber diffraction geometries are insufficient for calculating RNA and DNA stacking energies.
© 2011 American Chemical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21619071      PMCID: PMC3142330          DOI: 10.1021/jp2012733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  23 in total

1.  Structure, energetics, and dynamics of the nucleic Acid base pairs: nonempirical ab initio calculations.

Authors:  P Hobza; J Sponer
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  1999-11-10       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  A standard reference frame for the description of nucleic acid base-pair geometry.

Authors:  W K Olson; M Bansal; S K Burley; R E Dickerson; M Gerstein; S C Harvey; U Heinemann; X J Lu; S Neidle; Z Shakked; H Sklenar; M Suzuki; C S Tung; E Westhof; C Wolberger; H M Berman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-10-12       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Characterizing the strength of individual hydrogen bonds in DNA base pairs.

Authors:  Halina Szatyłowicz; Nina Sadlej-Sosnowska
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Assessment of the Performance of the M05-2X and M06-2X Exchange-Correlation Functionals for Noncovalent Interactions in Biomolecules.

Authors:  Edward G Hohenstein; Samuel T Chill; C David Sherrill
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Role of solvation in the energy stabilization inside the hydrophobic core of the protein rubredoxin.

Authors:  Kevin E Riley; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Stacking energies for average B-DNA structures from the combined density functional theory and symmetry-adapted perturbation theory approach.

Authors:  Annamaria Fiethen; Georg Jansen; Andreas Hesselmann; Martin Schütz
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  The post-SCF quantum chemistry characteristics of the guanine-guanine stacking B-DNA.

Authors:  Piotr Cysewski; Zaneta Czyznikowska; Robert Zaleśny; Przemysław Czeleń
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 3.676

Review 8.  Nature and magnitude of aromatic stacking of nucleic acid bases.

Authors:  Jirí Sponer; Kevin E Riley; Pavel Hobza
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 3.676

9.  Face-to-face arene-arene binding energies: dominated by dispersion but predicted by electrostatic and dispersion/polarizability substituent constants.

Authors:  Michelle Watt; Laura K E Hardebeck; Charles C Kirkpatrick; Michael Lewis
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Classification and energetics of the base-phosphate interactions in RNA.

Authors:  Craig L Zirbel; Judit E Sponer; Jiri Sponer; Jesse Stombaugh; Neocles B Leontis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-06-14       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  7 in total

1.  An experimentally-informed coarse-grained 3-Site-Per-Nucleotide model of DNA: structure, thermodynamics, and dynamics of hybridization.

Authors:  Daniel M Hinckley; Gordon S Freeman; Jonathan K Whitmer; Juan J de Pablo
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Effects of non-nearest neighbors on the thermodynamic stability of RNA GNRA hairpin tetraloops.

Authors:  Pamela L Vanegas; Teresa S Horwitz; Brent M Znosko
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 3.  Computational approaches to predicting the impact of novel bases on RNA structure and stability.

Authors:  Jason G Harrison; Yvonne B Zheng; Peter A Beal; Dean J Tantillo
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 5.100

4.  A Computational Model for Predicting Experimental RNA Nearest-Neighbor Free Energy Rankings: Inosine•Uridine Pairs.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Jolley; Michael Lewis; Brent M Znosko
Journal:  Chem Phys Lett       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.328

5.  The Amber ff99 Force Field Predicts Relative Free Energy Changes for RNA Helix Formation.

Authors:  Aleksandar Spasic; John Serafini; David H Mathews
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Rational design of aptazyme riboswitches for efficient control of gene expression in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Guocai Zhong; Haimin Wang; Charles C Bailey; Guangping Gao; Michael Farzan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Thermodynamic contribution and nearest-neighbor parameters of pseudouridine-adenosine base pairs in oligoribonucleotides.

Authors:  Graham A Hudson; Richard J Bloomingdale; Brent M Znosko
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 4.942

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.