Literature DB >> 22329761

Effects of non-nearest neighbors on the thermodynamic stability of RNA GNRA hairpin tetraloops.

Pamela L Vanegas1, Teresa S Horwitz, Brent M Znosko.   

Abstract

Currently, several models for predicting the secondary structure of RNA exist, one of which is free energy minimization using the Nearest Neighbor Model. This model predicts the lowest-free energy secondary structure from a primary sequence by summing the free energy contributions of the Watson-Crick nearest neighbor base pair combinations and any noncanonical secondary structure motif. The Nearest Neighbor Model also assumes that the free energy of the secondary structure motif is dependent solely on the identities of the nucleotides within the motif and the motif's nearest neighbors. To test the current assumption of the Nearest Neighbor Model that the non-nearest neighbors do not affect the stability of the motif, we optically melted different stem-loop oligonucleotides to experimentally determine their thermodynamic parameters. In each of these oligonucleotides, the hairpin loop sequence and the adjacent base pairs were held constant, while the first or second non-nearest neighbors were varied. The experimental results show that the thermodynamic contributions of the hairpin loop were dependent upon the identity of the first non-nearest neighbor, while the second non-nearest neighbor had a less obvious effect. These results were then used to create an updated model for predicting the thermodynamic contributions of a hairpin loop to the overall stability of the stem-loop structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22329761      PMCID: PMC3309161          DOI: 10.1021/bi300008j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  28 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Thermodynamics of single mismatches in RNA duplexes.

Authors:  R Kierzek; M E Burkard; D H Turner
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-10-26       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  A test of the model to predict unusually stable RNA hairpin loop stability.

Authors:  T Dale; R Smith; M J Serra
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.942

4.  Thermodynamic parameters for loop formation in RNA and DNA hairpin tetraloops.

Authors:  V P Antao; I Tinoco
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-02-25       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Stability of RNA hairpin loops closed by AU base pairs.

Authors:  Christopher J Vecenie; Martin J Serra
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2004-09-21       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  A model for the stabilities of RNA hairpins based on a study of the sequence dependence of stability for hairpins of six nucleotides.

Authors:  M J Serra; T J Axenson; D H Turner
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1994-11-29       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Thermodynamic parameters for an expanded nearest-neighbor model for formation of RNA duplexes with Watson-Crick base pairs.

Authors:  T Xia; J SantaLucia; M E Burkard; R Kierzek; S J Schroeder; X Jiao; C Cox; D H Turner
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1998-10-20       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Thermodynamic and spectroscopic study of bulge loops in oligoribonucleotides.

Authors:  C E Longfellow; R Kierzek; D H Turner
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1990-01-09       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Characterization of RNA hairpin loop stability.

Authors:  D R Groebe; O C Uhlenbeck
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1988-12-23       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Stability of RNA hairpins closed by wobble base pairs.

Authors:  M R Giese; K Betschart; T Dale; C K Riley; C Rowan; K J Sprouse; M J Serra
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1998-01-27       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  8 in total

1.  Mechanistic insights into temperature-dependent regulation of the simple cyanobacterial hsp17 RNA thermometer at base-pair resolution.

Authors:  Dominic Wagner; Jörg Rinnenthal; Franz Narberhaus; Harald Schwalbe
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Blind tests of RNA nearest-neighbor energy prediction.

Authors:  Fang-Chieh Chou; Wipapat Kladwang; Kalli Kappel; Rhiju Das
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Systematic reconstruction of binding and stability landscapes of the fluorogenic aptamer spinach.

Authors:  Simon Ketterer; David Fuchs; Wilfried Weber; Matthias Meier
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Improved Model for Predicting the Free Energy Contribution of Dinucleotide Bulges to RNA Duplex Stability.

Authors:  Jeremy C Tomcho; Magdalena R Tillman; Brent M Znosko
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Effect of sodium ions on RNA duplex stability.

Authors:  Zexiang Chen; Brent M Znosko
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 6.  Thermostability, Tunability, and Tenacity of RNA as Rubbery Anionic Polymeric Materials in Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine-Specific Cancer Targeting with Undetectable Toxicity.

Authors:  Daniel W Binzel; Xin Li; Nicolas Burns; Eshan Khan; Wen-Jui Lee; Li-Ching Chen; Satheesh Ellipilli; Wayne Miles; Yuan Soon Ho; Peixuan Guo
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 72.087

7.  Analysis of RNA nearest neighbor parameters reveals interdependencies and quantifies the uncertainty in RNA secondary structure prediction.

Authors:  Jeffrey Zuber; B Joseph Cabral; Iain McFadyen; David M Mauger; David H Mathews
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 4.942

8.  Identification of receptors for UNCG and GNRA Z-turns and their occurrence in rRNA.

Authors:  Luigi D'Ascenzo; Quentin Vicens; Pascal Auffinger
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 16.971

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.