Literature DB >> 21614665

Mastery versus the standard proficiency target for basic laparoscopic skill training: effect on skill transfer and retention.

Nicoleta O Kolozsvari1, Pepa Kaneva, Chantalle Brace, Genevieve Chartrand, Marilou Vaillancourt, Jiguo Cao, Daniel Banaszek, Sebastian Demyttenaere, Melina C Vassiliou, Gerald M Fried, Liane S Feldman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little evidence exists to guide educators in the best way to implement simulation within surgical skills curricula. This study investigated whether practicing a basic Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) simulator task [peg transfer (PT)] facilitates learning a more complex skill [intracorporeal suturing (ICS)] and compared the effect of PT training to mastery with training to the passing level on PT retention and on learning ICS.
METHODS: For this study, 98 surgically naïve subjects were randomized to one of three PT training groups: control, standard training, and overtraining. All the participants then trained in ICS. The learning curves for ICS were analyzed by estimating the learning plateau and rate using nonlinear regression. Skill retention was assessed by retesting participants 1 month after training. The groups were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Effectiveness of skill transfer was calculated using the transfer effectiveness ratio (TER). Data are presented as mean±standard deviation (p<0.05).
RESULTS: The study was completed by 77 participants (28 control, 26 standard, and 23 overtrained subjects). The ICS learning plateau rose with increasing PT training (452±10 vs. 459±10 vs. 467±10; p<0.01). Increased PT training was associated with a trend toward higher initial ICS scores (128±107 vs. 127±110 vs. 183±106; p=0.13) and faster learning rates (15±4 vs. 14±4 vs. 13±4 trials; p=0.10). At retention, there were no differences in PT scores (p=0.5). The PT training took 20±10 min for standard training and 39±20 min for overtraining (p<0.01). Overtrained participants saved 11±5 min in ICS training compared with the control subjects (p=0.04). However, TER was 0.165 for the overtraining group and 0.160 for the standard training group, suggesting that PT overtraining took longer than the time saved on ICS training.
CONCLUSION: For surgically naïve subjects, part-task training with PT alone was associated with slight improvements in the learning curve for ICS. However, overtraining with PT did not improve skill retention, and peg training alone was not an efficient strategy for learning ICS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21614665     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1743-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  28 in total

1.  The power law repealed: the case for an exponential law of practice.

Authors:  A Heathcote; S Brown; D J Mewhort
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-06

2.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains.

Authors:  K Anders Ericsson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman; Melina C Vassiliou; Shannon A Fraser; Donna Stanbridge; Gabriela Ghitulescu; Christopher G Andrew
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Simulation and clinical practice: strengthening the relationship.

Authors:  R L Kneebone; W Scott; A Darzi; M Horrocks
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.251

6.  Initial laparoscopic basic skills training shortens the learning curve of laparoscopic suturing and is cost-effective.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; William W Hope; James R Korndorffer; Sarah Markley; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Proficiency maintenance: impact of ongoing simulator training on laparoscopic skill retention.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; James R Korndorffer; Sarah Markley; Rafael Sierra; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  A research agenda for gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  D R Urbach; K D Horvath; N N Baxter; B A Jobe; A K Madan; A D Pryor; L Khaitan; A Torquati; S T Brower; T L Trus; S Schwaitzberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training leads to improved operating room skill that is resistant to decay.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; Christina Acker; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 2.058

10.  Why Johnny cannot operate.

Authors:  Richard H Bell
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  8 in total

1.  Impact of one-to-one tutoring on fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) passing rate in a single center experience outside the United States: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Federico Gheza; Paolo Raimondi; Leonardo Solaini; Federico Coccolini; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Nazario Portolani; Guido Alberto Massimo Tiberio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Impact of continuous training through distributed practice for acquisition of minimally invasive surgical skills.

Authors:  Bruce Negrello Nakata; Worens Cavalini; Eduardo A Bonin; Paolo R Salvalaggio; Marcelo P Loureiro
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Transferability of laparoscopic skills using the virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  Cui Yang; Uljana Kalinitschenko; Jens R Helmert; Juergen Weitz; Christoph Reissfelder; Soeren Torge Mees
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Characterizing the learning curve of the VBLaST-PT(©) (Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer).

Authors:  Likun Zhang; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Venkata Sreekanth Arikatla; Woojin Ahn; Cristol Grosdemouge; Jesse M Rideout; Scott K Epstein; Suvranu De; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Daniel B Jones; Caroline G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Design and implementation of a proficiency-based, structured endoscopy course for medical students applying for a surgical specialty.

Authors:  Gunter De Win; Siska Van Bruwaene; Christopher Allen; Dirk De Ridder
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2013-05-09

6.  Practicing Procedural Skills Is More Effective Than Basic Psychomotor Training in Knee Arthroscopy: A Randomized Study.

Authors:  Mads Emil Jacobsen; Amandus Gustafsson; Per Gorm Jørgensen; Yoon Soo Park; Lars Konge
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-23

7.  Evaluation of a remote-controlled laparoscopic camera holder for basic laparoscopic skills acquisition: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mohammad S A Amin; Abdullatif Aydin; Nurhan Abbud; Ben Van Cleynenbreugel; Domenico Veneziano; Bhaskar Somani; Ali Serdar Gözen; Juan Palou Redorta; M Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Jonathan Makanjuoala; Kamran Ahmed
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Procedural specificity in laparoscopic simulator training: protocol for a randomised educational superiority trial.

Authors:  Flemming Bjerrum; Jette Led Sorensen; Lars Konge; Jane Lindschou; Susanne Rosthøj; Bent Ottesen; Jeanett Strandbygaard
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 2.463

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.