Literature DB >> 21604095

Is surface-based orientation influenced by a proportional relationship of shape parameters?

Bradley R Sturz1, Kent D Bodily.   

Abstract

We investigated the extent to which parameters of environmental shape - namely the major and minor principal axes of space which pass through the centroid and approximate length and width of the entire space, respectively, were subject to similar psychophysical principles as those involved in distance discriminations. We developed an orientation task that allowed us to manipulate the ratio of the major to the minor principal axes of an enclosure during training and control for orientation by alternative cues other than principal axes such as wall lengths or corner angles during testing. Participants trained in an environment with a larger hypothetical discriminability ratio allocated more responses to locations specified by the principal axes of space across novel enclosure types compared to a group trained with a smaller hypothetical discriminability ratio. Results suggest that psychophysical principles may operate on the discrimination of environmental shape parameters and delineate a potential mechanism for experiential and developmental changes in orientation ability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21604095     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0111-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  20 in total

1.  Shape parameters explain data from spatial transformations: comment on Pearce et al. (2004) and Tommasi & Polli (2004).

Authors:  Ken Cheng; C R Gallistel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2005-04

2.  Dissecting the geometric module: a sense linkage for metric and landmark information in animals' spatial reorientation.

Authors:  Valeria Anna Sovrano; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-07

3.  How fish do geometry in large and in small spaces.

Authors:  Valeria Anna Sovrano; Angelo Bisazza; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Learning about environmental geometry: an associative model.

Authors:  Noam Y Miller; Sara J Shettleworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2007-07

5.  Reorientation by geometric and landmark information in environments of different size.

Authors:  Giorgio Vallortigara; Marco Feruglio; Valeria Anna Sovrano
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2005-09

6.  The development of ocular dominance columns in normal and visually deprived monkeys.

Authors:  S LeVay; T N Wiesel; D H Hubel
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1980-05-01       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Orientation in trapezoid-shaped enclosures: implications for theoretical accounts of geometry learning.

Authors:  Bradley R Sturz; Taylor Gurley; Kent D Bodily
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2011-04

8.  Encoding of relative enclosure size in a dynamic three-dimensional virtual environment by humans.

Authors:  Bradley R Sturz; Debbie M Kelly
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children.

Authors:  L Hermer; E S Spelke
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-07-07       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Growing in circles: rearing environment alters spatial navigation in fish.

Authors:  Alisha A Brown; Marcia L Spetch; Peter L Hurd
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-07
View more
  8 in total

1.  Enclosure size and the use of local and global geometric cues for reorientation.

Authors:  Bradley R Sturz; Martha R Forloines; Kent D Bodily
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

2.  Geometric orientation by humans: angles weigh in.

Authors:  Danielle M Lubyk; Brian Dupuis; Lucio Gutiérrez; Marcia L Spetch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

3.  Overtraining and the use of feature and geometric cues for reorientation.

Authors:  Bradley R Sturz; Katherine A Gaskin; Kent D Bodily
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-01-03

4.  Get out of the corner: Inhibition and the effect of location type and number on perceptron and human reorientation.

Authors:  Brian Dupuis; Michael R W Dawson
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  On Discriminating between Geometric Strategies of Surface-Based Orientation.

Authors:  Bradley R Sturz; Kent D Bodily
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-04-25

6.  Orientation in Virtual Reality Does Not Fully Measure Up to the Real-World.

Authors:  Kazushige Kimura; James F Reichert; Ashley Olson; Omid Ranjbar Pouya; Xikui Wang; Zahra Moussavi; Debbie M Kelly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Spontaneous reorientation is guided by perceived surface distance, not by image matching or comparison.

Authors:  Sang Ah Lee; Nathan Winkler-Rhoades; Elizabeth S Spelke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Reorienting in virtual 3D environments: do adult humans use principal axes, medial axes or local geometry?

Authors:  Althea H Ambosta; James F Reichert; Debbie M Kelly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.