Literature DB >> 16794851

How fish do geometry in large and in small spaces.

Valeria Anna Sovrano1, Angelo Bisazza, Giorgio Vallortigara.   

Abstract

It has been shown that children and non-human animals seem to integrate geometric and featural information to different extents in order to reorient themselves in environments of different spatial scales. We trained fish (redtail splitfins, Xenotoca eiseni) to reorient to find a corner in a rectangular tank with a distinctive featural cue (a blue wall). Then we tested fish after displacement of the feature on another adjacent wall. In the large enclosure, fish chose the two corners with the feature, and also tended to choose among them the one that maintained the correct arrangement of the featural cue with respect to geometric sense (i.e. left-right position). In contrast, in the small enclosure, fish chose both the two corners with the features and the corner, without any feature, that maintained the correct metric arrangement of the walls with respect to geometric sense. Possible reasons for species differences in the use of geometric and non-geometric information are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16794851     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-006-0029-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  19 in total

1.  Enclosure size and the use of local and global geometric cues for reorientation.

Authors:  Bradley R Sturz; Martha R Forloines; Kent D Bodily
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

2.  Geometric and featural systems, separable and combined: Evidence from reorientation in people with Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Katrina Ferrara; Barbara Landau
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-08-10

3.  Place learning prior to and after telencephalon ablation in bamboo and coral cat sharks (Chiloscyllium griseum and Atelomycterus marmoratus).

Authors:  Theodora Fuss; Horst Bleckmann; Vera Schluessel
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Is surface-based orientation influenced by a proportional relationship of shape parameters?

Authors:  Bradley R Sturz; Kent D Bodily
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

Review 5.  25 years of research on the use of geometry in spatial reorientation: a current theoretical perspective.

Authors:  Ken Cheng; Janellen Huttenlocher; Nora S Newcombe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

6.  The shark Chiloscyllium griseum can orient using turn responses before and after partial telencephalon ablation.

Authors:  Theodora Fuss; Horst Bleckmann; Vera Schluessel
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 7.  Framing the grid: effect of boundaries on grid cells and navigation.

Authors:  Julija Krupic; Marius Bauza; Stephen Burton; John O'Keefe
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Optimal combination of environmental cues and path integration during navigation.

Authors:  Lori A Sjolund; Jonathan W Kelly; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-01

Review 9.  Two systems of spatial representation underlying navigation.

Authors:  Sang Ah Lee; Elizabeth S Spelke
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas, and orang utans use feature and spatial cues in two spatial memory tasks.

Authors:  Patricia Kanngiesser; Josep Call
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.