Literature DB >> 22212980

Overtraining and the use of feature and geometric cues for reorientation.

Bradley R Sturz1, Katherine A Gaskin, Kent D Bodily.   

Abstract

Using a dynamic three-dimensional virtual environment task, we investigated the influence of overtraining of feature and geometric cues on preferential spatial cue use. We trained two groups of human participants to respond to feature and geometric cues in separate enclosures before placing these cues in conflict on a critical test trial. All participants learned to respond to rewarded features located along the principal axis of a rectangular search space and to rewarded geometric cues of a rectangular search space in separate training phases followed by a single test trial. During the test trial, we situated the rewarded features in the unrewarded geometric corners and the unrewarded features in rewarded geometric corners. For one group, participants were overtrained with feature cues compared to geometric cues before experiencing the conflict test; whereas, for another group, participants were overtrained with geometric cues compared to feature cues before experiencing the conflict test. Although both groups learned to respond to both feature and geometric cues at an equivalent rate and to an equivalent level of terminal accuracy, testing results revealed no difference between the groups with respect to their preference for feature or geometric cues. Despite a lack of influence of overtraining on spatial cue preference, participants showed an overall preference for feature cues. We discuss the results with respect to implications for theoretical accounts of spatial learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22212980     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0410-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  24 in total

1.  Acquisition of knowledge about spatial location: assessing the generality of the mechanism of learning.

Authors:  V D Chamizo
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2003-02

2.  Ants learn geometry and features.

Authors:  Antoine Wystrach; Guy Beugnon
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Distinct error-correcting and incidental learning of location relative to landmarks and boundaries.

Authors:  Christian F Doeller; Neil Burgess
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance.

Authors:  Sander Nieuwenhuis; Birte U Forstmann; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Is surface-based orientation influenced by a proportional relationship of shape parameters?

Authors:  Bradley R Sturz; Kent D Bodily
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

6.  Beyond core knowledge: Natural geometry.

Authors:  Elizabeth Spelke; Sang Ah Lee; Véronique Izard
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-05-01

7.  Orientation in trapezoid-shaped enclosures: implications for theoretical accounts of geometry learning.

Authors:  Bradley R Sturz; Taylor Gurley; Kent D Bodily
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2011-04

8.  Reorienting when cues conflict: A role for information content in spatial learning?

Authors:  Bradley R Sturz; Stephanie M Diemer
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  The information content of panoramic images II: view-based navigation in nonrectangular experimental arenas.

Authors:  Allen Cheung; Wolfgang Stürzl; Jochen Zeil; Ken Cheng
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2008-01

10.  Potentiation, overshadowing, and blocking of spatial learning based on the shape of the environment.

Authors:  John M Pearce; Moira Graham; Mark A Good; Peter M Jones; Anthony McGregor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.