Literature DB >> 21601338

PET-MRI fusion in head-and-neck oncology: current status and implications for hybrid PET/MRI.

Denys J Loeffelbein1, Michael Souvatzoglou, Veronika Wankerl, Axel Martinez-Möller, Julia Dinges, Markus Schwaiger, Ambros J Beer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review the current status and clinical effect of PET-MRI image fusion in the staging of head-and-neck cancer and to show its implications for imaging with future hybrid PET/MRI scanners.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the current literature in order to provide an overview of the potential of the combination of the anatomic and functional imaging capabilities of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and of the potential for molecular and metabolic imaging with Positron emission tomography (PET). The research question was whether these image devices might be of synergistic value.
RESULTS: PET with [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose has shown promising results for the assessment of lymph node involvement in cancer, the identification of distant metastasis and synchronous and metachronous tumors, and the evaluation of tumor recurrence or carcinoma of an unknown primary. For morphologic imaging, MRI has several advantages compared with computed tomography in the head-and-neck area. This is mainly because of the superior soft tissue contrast and fewer artifacts from dental implants. Moreover, MRI allows functional imaging, such as the assessment of perfusion with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. The published data indicate that image fusion should be beneficial in the case of the recurrence of oromaxillofacial cancer and in the evaluation of potential metastatic lymph nodes. However, retrospective image fusion is technically demanding in the head-and-neck area, mainly because of the varied patient positions used for the various scanners and the anatomic complexity of this region.
CONCLUSIONS: Combined PET/MRI scanners might overcome the above-named problems. Both sequential and fully integrated PET/MRI scanners are now available in selected departments, and future studies will show whether hybrid PET/MRI is of greater clinical value than PET/CT and retrospective image fusion techniques.
Copyright © 2012 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21601338     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  29 in total

1.  Combined multimodal co-registration of PET/CT and MRI images increases diagnostic accuracy in squamous cell carcinoma staging.

Authors:  Alessandro Stecco; Silvio Ciolfi; Francesco Buemi; Alessia Cassarà; Gian Mauro Sacchetti; Marco Brambilla; Alessandro Carriero
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Is integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI superior to 18F-FDG PET/CT in the differentiation of incidental tracer uptake in the head and neck area?

Authors:  Benedikt Michael Schaarschmidt; Benedikt Gomez; Christian Buchbender; Johannes Grueneisen; Felix Nensa; Lino Morris Sawicki; Verena Ruhlmann; Axel Wetter; Gerald Antoch; Philipp Heusch
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 3.  Potential Role of PET/MRI for Imaging Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Sungheon Gene Kim; Kent Friedman; Sohil Patel; Mari Hagiwara
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Clinical oncologic applications of PET/MRI: a new horizon.

Authors:  Sasan Partovi; Andres Kohan; Christian Rubbert; Jose Luis Vercher-Conejero; Chiara Gaeta; Roger Yuh; Lisa Zipp; Karin A Herrmann; Mark R Robbin; Zhenghong Lee; Raymond F Muzic; Peter Faulhaber; Pablo R Ros
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-03-20

5.  Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of sequential PET/MRI using a newly developed mobile PET system for brain imaging.

Authors:  Mizue Suzuki; Yasutaka Fushimi; Tomohisa Okada; Takuya Hinoda; Ryusuke Nakamoto; Yoshiki Arakawa; Nobukatsu Sawamoto; Kaori Togashi; Yuji Nakamoto
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Comparison of MRI, CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of local and metastatic of nasopharyngeal carcinomas: an updated meta analysis of clinical studies.

Authors:  Wang-Sheng Chen; Jian-Jun Li; Lan Hong; Zeng-Bao Xing; Fen Wang; Chang-Qing Li
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 7.  Sequential whole-body PET/MR scanner: concept, clinical use, and optimisation after two years in the clinic. The manufacturer's perspective.

Authors:  Antonis Kalemis; Bénédicte M A Delattre; Susanne Heinzer
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  k-space sampling optimization for ultrashort TE imaging of cortical bone: applications in radiation therapy planning and MR-based PET attenuation correction.

Authors:  Lingzhi Hu; Kuan-Hao Su; Gisele C Pereira; Anu Grover; Bryan Traughber; Melanie Traughber; Raymond F Muzic
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  Positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging: technical review.

Authors:  Raymond F Muzic; Frank P DiFilippo
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 0.800

10.  Exploring temporospatial changes in glucose metabolic disorder, learning, and memory dysfunction in a rat model of diffuse axonal injury.

Authors:  Jia Li; Lei Gu; Dong-Fu Feng; Fang Ding; Guangyao Zhu; Jiandong Rong
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 5.269

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.