Alessandro Stecco1, Silvio Ciolfi2, Francesco Buemi2, Alessia Cassarà2, Gian Mauro Sacchetti3, Marco Brambilla4, Alessandro Carriero2. 1. Radiology Department, University of Eastern Piedmont, "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, Corso Mazzini 18, 28100, Novara, Italy. a.stecco@libero.it. 2. Radiology Department, University of Eastern Piedmont, "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, Corso Mazzini 18, 28100, Novara, Italy. 3. Nuclear Medicine Department, University of Eastern Piedmont, "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, Novara, Italy. 4. Medical Physics Department, University of Eastern Piedmont, "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, Novara, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of our study was to assess the diagnostic value of multi-modal imaging through co-registration of short tau inversion recovery (STIR) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MRI with (18)FDG-PET/CT in T and N staging of head and neck tumours. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 25 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who had undergone MRI and PET/CT before treatment were retrospectively evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of PET/CT, MRI and their combined use were assessed in T and N staging. Histopathology and follow-up imaging results were used as the gold standard. RESULTS: In assessing trans-compartmental extensions, PET-MRI showed 93 % sensitivity, 88 % specificity, 94 % PPV, and 88 % NPV, as compared to the 94 and 53 % sensitivity, 75 and 75 % specificity, 89 and 82 % PPV, and 86 and 43 % demonstrated by MRI and PET, respectively. In the identification of pathological lymph nodes, PET-MRI showed 92 % sensitivity, 89 % specificity, 96 % PPV, and 89 % NPV, whereas PET/CT displayed 72 % sensitivity, 89 % specificity, 95 % PPV and 53 % NPV. The corresponding figures for DWI and STIR sequences were 84 and 100 % sensitivity, 67 and 56 % specificity, 88 and 86 % PPV, and 60 and 100 % NPV, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-modal imaging assessment of co-registered MRI and PET/CT images provides more accurate results for trans-compartmental extensions in T and N staging than the individual techniques alone.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of our study was to assess the diagnostic value of multi-modal imaging through co-registration of short tau inversion recovery (STIR) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MRI with (18)FDG-PET/CT in T and N staging of head and neck tumours. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 25 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who had undergone MRI and PET/CT before treatment were retrospectively evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of PET/CT, MRI and their combined use were assessed in T and N staging. Histopathology and follow-up imaging results were used as the gold standard. RESULTS: In assessing trans-compartmental extensions, PET-MRI showed 93 % sensitivity, 88 % specificity, 94 % PPV, and 88 % NPV, as compared to the 94 and 53 % sensitivity, 75 and 75 % specificity, 89 and 82 % PPV, and 86 and 43 % demonstrated by MRI and PET, respectively. In the identification of pathological lymph nodes, PET-MRI showed 92 % sensitivity, 89 % specificity, 96 % PPV, and 89 % NPV, whereas PET/CT displayed 72 % sensitivity, 89 % specificity, 95 % PPV and 53 % NPV. The corresponding figures for DWI and STIR sequences were 84 and 100 % sensitivity, 67 and 56 % specificity, 88 and 86 % PPV, and 60 and 100 % NPV, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-modal imaging assessment of co-registered MRI and PET/CT images provides more accurate results for trans-compartmental extensions in T and N staging than the individual techniques alone.
Authors: Dae Young Yoon; Hee Sung Hwang; Suk Ki Chang; Young-Soo Rho; Hwoe Young Ahn; Jin Hwan Kim; In Jae Lee Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-10-09 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: C Laubenbacher; D Saumweber; C Wagner-Manslau; R J Kau; M Herz; N Avril; S Ziegler; C Kruschke; W Arnold; M Schwaiger Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1995-10 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: R B J de Bondt; P J Nelemans; F Bakers; J W Casselman; C Peutz-Kootstra; B Kremer; P A M Hofman; R G H Beets-Tan Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-10-07 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jacqueline Dinnes; Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Yemisi Takwoingi; Seau Tak Cheung; Paul Nathan; Rubeta N Matin; Naomi Chuchu; Sue Ann Chan; Alana Durack; Susan E Bayliss; Abha Gulati; Lopa Patel; Clare Davenport; Kathie Godfrey; Manil Subesinghe; Zoe Traill; Jonathan J Deeks; Hywel C Williams Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-07-01
Authors: Urs Dietmar Achim Müller-Richter; Anja Gesierich; Alexander Christian Kübler; Stefan Hartmann; Roman Camillus Brands Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2017-07-31 Impact factor: 5.344