Literature DB >> 21594657

Pouch function and quality of life after successful management of pouch-related septic complications in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Rudolf Mennigen1, Norbert Senninger, Matthias Bruewer, Emile Rijcken.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis is associated with pouch-related septic complications (PRSC) in 10% of patients. This study questioned if PRSC have a negative impact on pouch function and quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty consecutive patients undergoing IPAA for ulcerative colitis between 1997 and 2009 were reviewed. At 1-year follow-up, patients were asked to complete questionnaires including a pouch function score (Oresland score, 0-16 points, 0 optimum) and two quality of life scores [Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ), 1-7 points, 7 optimum; Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), 0-144 points, 144 optimum].
RESULTS: Twelve out of 130 patients (9.2%) undergoing IPAA developed PRSC. These included anastomotic dehiscence (five), pouch leakage (three, one patient had a combined leak), peripouchal abscess (three), pouch-anal fistula (one), and pouch-vaginal fistula (one). Omission of diverting ileostomy was a risk factor for PRSC (OR 4.62, CI 1.17-18.4). PRSC led to four pouch failures (33%), whereas no failure occurred in the control group (p < 0.001). Median 3 (range, 1-10) further operations were necessary until the pouch was salvaged or definitively lost. If the pouch was salvaged, functional Oresland score (8.2 ± 1.3 vs. 6.6 ± 0.5; p = 0.127), SIBDQ (5.0 ± 0.5 vs. 5.5 ± 0.1; p = 0.203), and GIQLI (95.8 ± 8.4 vs. 107.3 ± 2.6; p = 0.119) were not significantly inferior to uncomplicated controls.
CONCLUSIONS: In case of PRSC, even multiple surgical approaches are worthwhile as the outcome of salvaged pouches in terms of function and quality of life is not substantially inferior to patients without septic complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21594657     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-011-0802-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  27 in total

1.  [Validation of the new German translation version of the "Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire" (SIBDQ)].

Authors:  M Rose; H Fliege; M Hildebrandt; J Körber; P Arck; A Dignass; B Klapp
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  The correlation between quality of life and functional outcome in ulcerative colitis patients after proctocolectomy ileal pouch anal anastomosis.

Authors:  E Carmon; A Keidar; A Ravid; G Goldman; M Rabau
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Factors associated with failure in managing pelvic sepsis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)--a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Ismail Sagap; Feza H Remzi; Jeffrey P Hammel; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Results and complications after ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a meta-analysis of 43 observational studies comprising 9,317 patients.

Authors:  Willem E Hueting; Erik Buskens; Ingeborg van der Tweel; Hein G Gooszen; Cees J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 2.588

5.  Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  A G Parks; R J Nicholls
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1978-07-08

6.  Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA): functional outcome after postoperative pelvic sepsis. A prospective study of 100 patients.

Authors:  Helena Hallberg; Dagny Ståhlberg; Jan-Erik Akerlund
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Factors associated with septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  Ravi P Kiran; Andre da Luz Moreira; Feza H Remzi; James M Church; Ian Lavery; Jeffery Hammel; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Improved outcome due to increased experience and individualized management of leaks after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  Manoj J Raval; Margaret Schnitzler; Brenda I O'Connor; Zane Cohen; Robin S McLeod
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Proximal diversion at the time of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: current practices of North American colorectal surgeons.

Authors:  Sandra L de Montbrun; Paul M Johnson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Patient quality of life after successful restorative proctocolectomy is normal.

Authors:  D M Richards; S A Hughes; M H Irving; N A Scott
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.788

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  [Restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis : Long-term functional results and quality of life].

Authors:  E Rijcken; N Senninger; R Mennigen
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Morbidity of loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rudolf Mennigen; Wiebke Sewald; Norbert Senninger; Emile Rijcken
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Factors Associated with Long-Term Quality of Life After Restorative Proctocolectomy with Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis.

Authors:  Olga A Lavryk; Luca Stocchi; Tracy L Hull; Emre Gorgun; Sherief Shawki; Jeremy M Lipman; Stefan D Holubar; Conor P Delaney; Scott R Steele
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Outcome and functional prognosis of pelvic sepsis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Shozo Ide; Toshimitsu Araki; Yoshiki Okita; Mikio Kawamura; Yuji Toiyama; Minako Kobayashi; Masaki Ohi; Koji Tanaka; Yasuhiro Inoue; Keiichi Uchida; Yasuhiko Mohri; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Outcomes of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without primary diverting loop ileostomy if postoperative sepsis develops.

Authors:  O A Lavryk; T L Hull; L C Duraes; L Stocchi; J H Ashburn; D Liska; E Gorgun; H Kessler
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  D-pouch: a modified ileal J-pouch for patients with ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Y Zhang; H Hu; C Jiang; Q Qian; Z Ding
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Quality of life after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Steffen Koerdt; Ekkehard C Jehle; Martin E Kreis; Michael S Kasparek
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Scintigraphic Small Intestinal Transit Time and Defaecography in Patients with J-Pouch.

Authors:  Mie Dilling Kjaer; Jane Angel Simonsen; Svend Hvidsten; Jens Kjeldsen; Oke Gerke; Niels Qvist
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2015-10-10

9.  Endo-sponge Assisted Early Surgical Closure of Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomotic Leakage Preserves Long-term Function: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Karin A Wasmann; Maud A Reijntjes; Merel E Stellingwerf; Cyriel Y Ponsioen; Christianne J Buskens; Roel Hompes; Pieter J Tanis; Willem A Bemelman
Journal:  J Crohns Colitis       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 9.071

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.