Literature DB >> 29285681

Outcomes of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without primary diverting loop ileostomy if postoperative sepsis develops.

O A Lavryk1, T L Hull1, L C Duraes1, L Stocchi1, J H Ashburn1, D Liska1, E Gorgun1, H Kessler2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to assess the short-term and long-term consequences of diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) omission in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery complicated by postoperative pelvic sepsis.
METHODS: This was a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. Of 4031 patients who underwent IPAA in 1983-2014, 357 developed IPAA-related pelvic sepsis with or without anastomotic dehiscence. Patients with Crohn's disease or cancer were excluded. The patient cohort was divided into two groups, depending on the presence or absence of DLI. Patient characteristics, short-term and long-term outcomes were compared. Long-term pouch survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Quality of life (QOL) in the groups was compared at the latest follow-up.
RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-six patients developing pelvic sepsis had diversion at the time of IPAA (D group) and in 31 who developed pelvic sepsis DLI had been omitted (O group). The length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the O group 11.5 (3-33) days versus 8 (2-59) days in the D group (p = 0.006). Forty-eight percent of patients from the O group with anastomotic leak underwent reoperation and had a DLI formed at this second procedure versus 12% in the D group requiring reoperation (p < 0.0001). In long-term follow-up, there was no difference in pouch survival between the groups: 99 versus 97% after 5 years and 88 versus 87% after 10 years, in the O group and D group, respectively (p = 0.40). There was no difference in QOL observed between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Omission of DLI in selected patients who had IPAA surgery did not increase pouch failure or adversely affect QOL in the long term, if pelvic sepsis occurred.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leak; Ileostomy; Pelvic sepsis; Proctocolectomy, Restorative

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29285681     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1737-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  22 in total

Review 1.  Complications of abdominal stoma surgery.

Authors:  P C Shellito
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 2.  Salvage procedures after restorative proctocolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  George E Theodoropoulos; Eran N Choman; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Factors associated with failure in managing pelvic sepsis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)--a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Ismail Sagap; Feza H Remzi; Jeffrey P Hammel; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  A defunctioning ileostomy does not prevent clinical anastomotic leak after a low anterior resection: a prospective, comparative study.

Authors:  N Y Wong; K W Eu
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  One-stage restorative proctocolectomy without temporary ileostomy for ulcerative colitis: a note of caution.

Authors:  M E Williamson; W G Lewis; P M Sagar; P J Holdsworth; D Johnston
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 6.  Omission of temporary diversion in restorative proctocolectomy--is it safe?

Authors:  J J Tjandra; V W Fazio; J W Milsom; I C Lavery; J R Oakley; J M Fabre
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Life quality and psychological morbidity with an ileostomy.

Authors:  R W Awad; T M el-Gohary; J S Skilton; J B Elder
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Ileal pouch anal anastomosis: analysis of outcome and quality of life in 3707 patients.

Authors:  Victor Warren Fazio; Ravi P Kiran; Feza H Remzi; John Calvin Coffey; Helen Mary Heneghan; Hasan Tarik Kirat; Elena Manilich; Bo Shen; Sean T Martin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Pouch function and quality of life after successful management of pouch-related septic complications in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Rudolf Mennigen; Norbert Senninger; Matthias Bruewer; Emile Rijcken
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Factors associated with septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  Ravi P Kiran; Andre da Luz Moreira; Feza H Remzi; James M Church; Ian Lavery; Jeffery Hammel; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Staging Pouch Surgery in Ulcerative Colitis in the Biological Era.

Authors:  Anton Risto; Maie Abdalla; Pär Myrelid
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2022-01-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.