Literature DB >> 15864610

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA): functional outcome after postoperative pelvic sepsis. A prospective study of 100 patients.

Helena Hallberg1, Dagny Ståhlberg, Jan-Erik Akerlund.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become a standard procedure for patients with ulcerative colitis requiring surgical intervention. The technique has greatly improved and, since 1990, all patients at Huddinge University Hospital have been operated on with the double stapled technique. Pelvic sepsis is one of the most serious complications postoperatively, and, according to previous reports, leads to impaired function of the pouch and, in some cases, extirpation of the pouch. AIM: The purpose of this study was to find out if pelvic sepsis postoperatively after IPAA leads to impaired functional outcome at long-term follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients with ulcerative colitis operated on between 1990 and 1997 with double stapled J-shaped pouches were followed prospectively with a standardised questionnaire, clinical follow-up and endoscopy of the pouch. The function of the pouch has been evaluated at a minimum of 2 years after surgery to compare the functional outcome between patients with and without pelvic sepsis postoperatively.
RESULTS: Twelve patients developed pelvic sepsis postoperatively. No significant differences were found in pouch evacuation frequency, incontinence, deferral time, usage of protecting pads, skin irritation, evacuation problems, diet, usage of medication or social handicap. There was one failure in the control group.
CONCLUSION: In this study, no evidence was found that suggested pelvic sepsis postoperatively impairs functional outcome after IPAA at long-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15864610     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-004-0717-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  21 in total

1.  Can the pouch be saved?

Authors:  D J Schoetz; J A Coller; M C Veidenheimer
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Gains and losses with stapling and omission of loop ileostomy in pelvic pouch surgery: a matched control study.

Authors:  K Gullberg; L Liljeqvist
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  One-stage restorative proctocolectomy without temporary ileostomy for ulcerative colitis: a note of caution.

Authors:  M E Williamson; W G Lewis; P M Sagar; P J Holdsworth; D Johnston
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Intra-abdominal "reservoir" in patients with permanent ileostomy. Preliminary observations on a procedure resulting in fecal "continence" in five ileostomy patients.

Authors:  N G Kock
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1969-08

5.  Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  A G Parks; R J Nicholls
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1978-07-08

6.  Outcome of pouch-related complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  M T Dayton; K P Larsen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Totally stapled abdominal restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  W A Kmiot; M R Keighley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  The incidence and outcome of pelvic sepsis following handsewn and stapled ileal pouch anal anastomoses.

Authors:  T Fukushima; A Sugita; K Koganei; M Shinozaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Long-term results.

Authors:  J H Pemberton; K A Kelly; R W Beart; R R Dozois; B G Wolff; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Manometric and functional comparison of ileal pouch anal anastomosis with and without anal manipulation.

Authors:  W Tuckson; I Lavery; V Fazio; J Oakley; J Church; J Milsom
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  5 in total

1.  Ten years experience of one-stage restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  M Davies; P R Hawley
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Surgical management of IBD--from an open to a laparoscopic approach.

Authors:  Léon Maggiori; Yves Panis
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Pouch function and quality of life after successful management of pouch-related septic complications in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Rudolf Mennigen; Norbert Senninger; Matthias Bruewer; Emile Rijcken
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis: outcomes, functional results, and quality of life in patients with more than 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  L Carcamo; P Miranda; A Zúñiga; E Alexander; M E Molina; G Urrejola; T Larach; R Miguieles; Felipe Bellolio
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Update of complications and functional outcome of the ileo-pouch anal anastomosis: overview of evidence and meta-analysis of 96 observational studies.

Authors:  Sharonne de Zeeuw; Usama Ahmed Ali; Usama Ahmed Ali; Rogier A R T Donders; Willem E Hueting; Frederik Keus; Cees J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 2.571

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.