Y Zhang1, H Hu2, C Jiang2, Q Qian2, Z Ding3. 1. Department of General Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. 2. Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery of Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Clinical Center of Intestinal and Colorectal Diseases of Hubei Province, Hubei Key Laboratory of Intestinal and Colorectal Diseases (Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University), Colorectal and Anal Disease Research Center of Medical School (Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University), Quality Control Center of Colorectal and Anal Surgery of Health Commission of Hubei Province, No. 169, DongHu Road, Wuhan, China. 3. Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery of Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Clinical Center of Intestinal and Colorectal Diseases of Hubei Province, Hubei Key Laboratory of Intestinal and Colorectal Diseases (Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University), Colorectal and Anal Disease Research Center of Medical School (Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University), Quality Control Center of Colorectal and Anal Surgery of Health Commission of Hubei Province, No. 169, DongHu Road, Wuhan, China. dingzhao@whu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis (J-IPAA) is the standard approach for patients requiring restorative proctocolectomy due to familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) or ulcerative colitis (UC). To obviate the risk of a J-tip leak, we modified the J-pouch with a D-pouch anal anastomosis (D-IPAA) designed to eliminate the ileal stump. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and medium-term functional outcomes of D-IPAA. METHODS: A retrospective comparison was made between D-IPAA and J-IPAA constructions after a restorative proctocolectomy. Clinical data were collated between October 2014-March 2018 recording operation duration, pouch construction time, pouch volume, intraoperative estimated blood loss, complication rates, readmissions and cumulative length of hospitalization. Continence was assessed at the final visit with the Wexner Cleveland Clinic Score along with the Cleveland Global Quality of Life (CGQL) scale. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients with FAP (n = 28) and UC (n = 69) who had J-IPAA (n = 54) or D-IPAA (n = 43) after proctocolectomy were identified. Patients were well matched with no differences noted in the intraoperative variables between the J- and D-pouch groups. The D-pouch construction time was shorter than that for a standard J-pouch. There was no difference in major or minor complications between groups. A pouch leak developed in each group: a cutaneous fistula from J tip leak in the J-IPAA group and a pouch-vaginal fistula from the IPAA the D-IPAA group. Clinical outcomes (the number of bowel movements) were equivalent in the two groups with the Wexner score significantly improving within each group up to 2.5 years and with improvement in the CGQL after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The D-pouch construction is safe and feasible for patients with UC and FAP with good functional outcome over the medium term and the potential to reduce the risk of pouch leaks.
BACKGROUND: Ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis (J-IPAA) is the standard approach for patients requiring restorative proctocolectomy due to familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) or ulcerative colitis (UC). To obviate the risk of a J-tip leak, we modified the J-pouch with a D-pouch anal anastomosis (D-IPAA) designed to eliminate the ileal stump. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and medium-term functional outcomes of D-IPAA. METHODS: A retrospective comparison was made between D-IPAA and J-IPAA constructions after a restorative proctocolectomy. Clinical data were collated between October 2014-March 2018 recording operation duration, pouch construction time, pouch volume, intraoperative estimated blood loss, complication rates, readmissions and cumulative length of hospitalization. Continence was assessed at the final visit with the Wexner Cleveland Clinic Score along with the Cleveland Global Quality of Life (CGQL) scale. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients with FAP (n = 28) and UC (n = 69) who had J-IPAA (n = 54) or D-IPAA (n = 43) after proctocolectomy were identified. Patients were well matched with no differences noted in the intraoperative variables between the J- and D-pouch groups. The D-pouch construction time was shorter than that for a standard J-pouch. There was no difference in major or minor complications between groups. A pouch leak developed in each group: a cutaneous fistula from J tip leak in the J-IPAA group and a pouch-vaginal fistula from the IPAA the D-IPAA group. Clinical outcomes (the number of bowel movements) were equivalent in the two groups with the Wexner score significantly improving within each group up to 2.5 years and with improvement in the CGQL after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The D-pouch construction is safe and feasible for patients with UC and FAP with good functional outcome over the medium term and the potential to reduce the risk of pouch leaks.
Authors: R E Lovegrove; A G Heriot; V Constantinides; H S Tilney; A W Darzi; V W Fazio; R J Nicholls; P P Tekkis Journal: Colorectal Dis Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 3.788
Authors: Willem E Hueting; Erik Buskens; Ingeborg van der Tweel; Hein G Gooszen; Cees J H M van Laarhoven Journal: Dig Surg Date: 2005-04-14 Impact factor: 2.588
Authors: Victor Warren Fazio; Ravi P Kiran; Feza H Remzi; John Calvin Coffey; Helen Mary Heneghan; Hasan Tarik Kirat; Elena Manilich; Bo Shen; Sean T Martin Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Hasan T Kirat; Ravi P Kiran; Mustafa Oncel; Bo Shen; Victor W Fazio; Feza H Remzi Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 4.585