Literature DB >> 21590790

Practical modifications to the time-to-event continual reassessment method for phase I cancer trials with fast patient accrual and late-onset toxicities.

Mei-Yin C Polley1.   

Abstract

The goal of phase I cancer trials is to determine the highest dose of a treatment regimen with an acceptable toxicity rate. Traditional designs for phase I trials, such as the Continual Reassessment Method (CRM) and the 3 + 3 design, require each patient or a cohort of patients to be fully evaluated for the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) before new patients can be enrolled. As such, the trial duration may be prohibitively long. The Time-to-Event Continual Reassessment Method (TITE-CRM, Cheung and Chappell, 2000) circumvents this limitation by allowing staggered patient accrual without the need for complete DLT follow-up of previously treated patients. However, in the setting of fast patient accrual and late-onset toxicities, the TITE-CRM results in overly aggressive dose escalation and exposes a considerable number of patients to toxic doses. We examine a modification to the TITE-CRM proposed by the original TITE-CRM creator and propose an alternative approach useful in this setting by incorporating an accrual suspension rule. A simulation study designed based on a neuro-oncology trial indicates that the modified methods provide a much improved degree of safety than the TITE-CRM while maintaining desirable design accuracy. The practical aspects of the proposed designs are discussed. The modifications presented are useful when planning phase I trials involving chemoradiation therapy.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21590790      PMCID: PMC3904348          DOI: 10.1002/sim.4255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  27 in total

1.  Dose-finding designs for HIV studies.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; M D Hughes; T Fenton
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Competing designs for phase I clinical trials: a review.

Authors:  William F Rosenberger; Linda M Haines
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  B E Storer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Some practical improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies.

Authors:  S N Goodman; M L Zahurak; S Piantadosi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  A comparison of two phase I trial designs.

Authors:  E L Korn; D Midthune; T T Chen; L V Rubinstein; M C Christian; R M Simon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Designing dose-escalation trials with late-onset toxicities using the time-to-event continual reassessment method.

Authors:  Daniel Normolle; Theodore Lawrence
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  The Neuroprotection with Statin Therapy for Acute Recovery Trial (NeuSTART): an adaptive design phase I dose-escalation study of high-dose lovastatin in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Mitchell S V Elkind; Ralph L Sacco; Robert B MacArthur; Daniel J Fink; Ellinor Peerschke; Howard Andrews; Greg Neils; Josh Stillman; Tania Corporan; Dana Leifer; Ken Cheung
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.266

8.  The bivariate continual reassessment method. extending the CRM to phase I trials of two competing outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2002-06

9.  Monitoring late-onset toxicities in phase I trials using predicted risks.

Authors:  B Nebiyou Bekele; Yuan Ji; Yu Shen; Peter F Thall
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 10.  Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Christophe Le Tourneau; J Jack Lee; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Statistical controversies in clinical research: requiem for the 3 + 3 design for phase I trials.

Authors:  X Paoletti; M Ezzalfani; C Le Tourneau
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  A Bayesian model-free approach to combination therapy phase I trials using censored time-to-toxicity data.

Authors:  Graham M Wheeler; Michael J Sweeting; Adrian P Mander
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 1.864

Review 3.  Early-Phase Platform Trials: A New Paradigm for Dose Finding and Treatment Screening in the Era of Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Mei-Yin C Polley; Ying Kuen Cheung
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-10-24

4.  NCI-RTOG translational program strategic guidelines for the early-stage development of radiosensitizers.

Authors:  Yaacov Richard Lawrence; Bhadrasain Vikram; James J Dignam; Arnab Chakravarti; Mitchell Machtay; Boris Freidlin; Naoko Takebe; Walter J Curran; Soren M Bentzen; Paul Okunieff; C Norman Coleman; Adam P Dicker
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Therapeutic Intervention Using a Smad7-Based Tat Protein to Treat Radiation-Induced Oral Mucositis.

Authors:  Mary-Keara Boss; Yao Ke; Li Bian; Lauren G Harrison; Ber-In Lee; Amber Prebble; Tiffany Martin; Erin Trageser; Spencer Hall; Donna D Wang; Suyan Wang; Lyndah Chow; Barry Holwerda; David Raben; Daniel Regan; Sana D Karam; Steven Dow; Christian D Young; Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-10-03       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  A Bayesian adaptive Phase I-II clinical trial for evaluating efficacy and toxicity with delayed outcomes.

Authors:  Joseph S Koopmeiners; Jaime Modiano
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 7.  Two may be better than one: PD-1/PD-L1 blockade combination approaches in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  David B Page; Harry Bear; Sangeetha Prabhakaran; Margaret E Gatti-Mays; Alexandra Thomas; Erin Cobain; Heather McArthur; Justin M Balko; Sofia R Gameiro; Rita Nanda; James L Gulley; Kevin Kalinsky; Julia White; Jennifer Litton; Steven J Chmura; Mei-Yin Polley; Benjamin Vincent; David W Cescon; Mary L Disis; Joseph A Sparano; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Sylvia Adams
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2019-10-08

8.  Practicalities in running early-phase trials using the time-to-event continual reassessment method (TiTE-CRM) for interventions with long toxicity periods using two radiotherapy oncology trials as examples.

Authors:  Erik van Werkhoven; Samantha Hinsley; Eleni Frangou; Jane Holmes; Rosemarie de Haan; Maria Hawkins; Sarah Brown; Sharon B Love
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 9.  Molecularly targeted agents as radiosensitizers in cancer therapy--focus on prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sara Alcorn; Amanda J Walker; Nishant Gandhi; Amol Narang; Aaron T Wild; Russell K Hales; Joseph M Herman; Danny Y Song; Theodore L Deweese; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Phuoc T Tran
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Escalation with overdose control using time to toxicity for cancer phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Mourad Tighiouart; Yuan Liu; André Rogatko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.